How long did it take you to realize that every author philosopher etc is just projecting his own personal experience on outside events? And that this projection is accepted merely because it is told in shared terms that make people think they understand/relate to it?
pic unrel
>>8089823
not long at all, but every time I point it out the pseuds on /lit/ bitch and moan at me
who cares
>>8089823
What "personal experience" was Alonzo Church projecting?
>How long did it take you to realize that every author philosopher etc is just projecting his own personal experience on outside events?
I thought it was obvious from day 1,
It's there any writer who really cares about writing original plots with complex plot structures?
I've realized film has better plots than literature.
>>8089823
a few chapters into Thus Spoke Zara.
I was under the impression that it was more of a story in the literary sense and less of an assembly of didactic parables and a goddamn life manual.
>muh camel
>muh bebe
>muh lion
Not to trivialize his philosophy, but his methodology is far too rigid. It's literally "this is what I did, therefore you need to do this exact thing to achieve my exact results" with no room for psychological diversity.
>>8089865
Dramatic narrative is largely a lost art in literature, you'll find it more in fantasy/scifi but with "literary" fiction then you're up shits creek.
>>8089898
It also made him go mad. The only good parts of his philosophy is when he Emersonizes Schopenhauer. All his original thinking is pisspoor at best. Heidegger somewhat salvaged it and made it coherent.
