What are some books that try to sell you a scam or a lie that I should watch out for?
Obligatory warning of religious texts
>>8089022
Thanks for the heads up. I started reading the Koran recently. XD
>>8089016
Psychology textbooks
Sociology textbooks
Highschool counselor's list of top 10 anything
>>8089028
that pic. jesus
>Psychology textbooks
Are you sure?
>>8089029
Read "Anatomy of An Epidemic" BG To ert Whitaker. That book has more citation and reliable sources than your average Psych textbook.
>>8089042
*by Robert Whitaker
>>8089022
>offers salvation for your eternal soul and a respite from anxiety and pain in this world
>he does it for free
>people still claim he was jewish
>>8089016
Anything written by an academic economist.
>>8089063
>he does it for free
People worshiping you as a god isn't for free.
>>8089078
He never said you had to worship. People are inclined to do so because He is supreme, awesome and the one who gave us Life.
Looks like someone hasn't read their Bible.
>>8089084
yes he does
not like that's a bad thing. if we venerate good things in our society and personal lives, then it only makes sense to worship the best and the highest.
>>8089063
>>8089084
>>>/trash/
Where christcuck posting belongs.
>>8089111
or /pol/
>>8089145
Why do my threads always turn into shitposting ;_;
>>8089029
I have a psychology textbook somewhere that claims Finnegans Wake is a nonsense word salad and Joyce just went full schizo.
I find because they really clamour to be recognised as science they sign post some good philosophers (Popper, Kuhn etc etc) but the understanding of most of what is mentioned is surface level at best amd often very wrong.
>>8089016
what are you actually asking?
anything in the world that is a scam or lie has books written about it
that includes homeopathy, tarot cards, technical analysis for investing, astrology, myers briggs testing, snake oil, alchemy etc etc etc etc etc
>>8089289
everyone else in this thread seems to understand, why are they smarter than you anon?
>>8089328
>questioning something implies a lack of understanding
religious person detected
get back in the fucking sack
>>8089403
no, I'm not religious
why are you making assumptions?
