>well murakami's popularity came from norwegian wood which is basically a bad eroge so it's understandable
Is かすっち(ふり: kastelpls)@highimpactsex right about Norwegian Wood and Murakami's popularity?
Just finised Norwegian Wood. I cant summarize it as a bad eroge at all. It has like... 3 sex scenes which are brief and unimaginative. Its an ok story if you like characters who have issues.
>>8057870
>3 sex scenes which are brief and unimaginative.
That's why it's a
>bad
eroge.
who cares what a weaboo thinks about books
though he is right that norwegian wood was the first novel which made him well-known, mostly because young adults loved it
>>8057869
this man, in my country he is nothing.
>>8057873
It would be a bad eroge if it was trying to be an eroge (i.e. it's bad because it fails as an eroge).
The book is not trying to be an eroge. Please think before posting next time, okay?
