is war and peace by Tolstoy any good? (i'm serious) yes/no + why?
Yes. I'm about 2/3 of the way in and I have to say it's probably the best book I've read. I was intrigued from the get go and the writing throughout is so profound and feels so powerful that I've truly enjoyed it all the way through so far. I don't agree with all the philosophical or political statements Tolstoy makes, but they're interesting to read. 10/10
>>8050290
One wonders if it would have been as popular if it were printed under the original title.
I don't like it. Too scattershot, too many plotlines don't go anywhere, and far too much apostrophe-essaying about how much Tolstoy hates the Great Man theory of history. (He's not wrong, but it's a quarter of the fucking book.)
Read Anna Karenina or even The Death of Ivan Ilyich instead.
>>8050519
Ah, yes, War: What Is It Good For? Well, if you ask me, absolutely nothing.
just watch the tv show. it's classic
>>8050583
War: war never changes.
Yes. It's fantastic. One scene involving mustaches and sleigh is better even than anything in Anna Karenina. The essays on history are a little obnoxious, but important to what he's getting at with the work.
Plus, despite length, it's not difficult at all. Just read it.
>>8050290
Its GOAT
A classic for a reason.
>>8050290
No. Reason being Tolstoy tried to diss Shakespeare.
A little too long. A rollicking historical novel written for the general reader, specifically for the young. Artistically unsatisfying. Cumbersome messages, didactic interludes, artificial coincidences. Uncritical of its historical sources.
>>8052513
dude, people can have opinions
>>8050290
No it's horrible. Academicians have been praising it for over a century just as a sort of inside joke.
>>8050290
Damn, I have no words in English to explain my point of view, but this book really shows, the society and relevant even now .
Especially good showed that all women whores
