Goodreads
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
Goodreads Thread!
Post your accounts and what boards you browse.
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2408134-sebastian
I browse /pol/ and /lit/
>>8044140
https://www.goodreads.com/victoriayork
Hello, boys and girls!
>>8044179
Hola ;^)
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51635060-niko
I browse /lit/, sometimes /b/ when I'm drunk.
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/29831737-pinkyivan
goodreads.com/Nate_Doge
>>8044140
Of all the books I've read, you haven't given a single one of them 4 stars or higher, except the Odyssey (I preferred Iliad). Nearly every book has 3 stars. Isn't that a little too critical or harsh? Der Prozess, for example, why did you give that only 3 stars? Do you think every book is sort of similar in quality?
I think Hamlet, Mysteries, or Petersburg are way, way, way better than Candide for example. Browsing your reviews, it's so hard finding out what's actually worth reading. I get that nothing is perfect (technically 5 stars), but doesn't it defeat the purpose of the entire rating system? Giving something 5 stars just shows that you thought the book was fantastic, which would be your 4 star rating right now.
No offense.
>>8045082
I think he uses the 5 star ratings only to have those books displayed on his profile, i.e. 4 is his "highest" rating.
>>8045096
Yeah I know, but then you aren't even able to differentiate between Candide and Hamlet, and that's pretty weird and makes the ratings worthless, in my opinion.
>>8045109
googleread ratings are already worthless
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/14424167-matei
>>8045262
I browse /lit and /his and sometimes /pol to have a good laugh
>>8044140
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/11129358-n
Cheers mates. I've updated the books I've read pretty recently.
http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1406384.John_Green
>>8044179
were books the escape from your mandibular prognathism
>>8044848
One at a time
goodreads.com/hacklasoul
I will to start writing reviews again, i swear.
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/54260515
Just /lit/, sometimes /his/ or the porn ones.
https://www.goodreads.com/Hallogallo
mostly /lit/ and /mu/, sometimes /g/ and /vr/
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/20574145-will
goodreads.com/jonyo
>>8046133
>Hearing Trumpet
Hey, are you that person who bought it in order to maybe gift it to a girl? How did you like it?
>>8046276
Not me, m8. Great book though. Very hallucinogenic, phantasmagorical surrealism in the vein of Unica Zurn and Henri Michaux
>>8044140
>it's a sebastian thread
https://www.goodreads.com/mrsbunny1
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/23200897-berber
>>8044140
"
2015 Reading Challenge
Sebastian read 597 books of his goal of 40! "
Lol you really want us believe that you read almost 2 books every day and not forget what they were about right away? Your kind are the worst on GR
>>8047060
>https://www.goodreads.com/victoriayork
this.
Unless these kind of users are lying to get attention.
>>8047093
>May
>Sebastian has read 342 books of his goal of 100!
Terrible reader or a liar
>>8047093
Undoubtedly they are. Just like the ones who only read Euclid/Wittgenstein/Pynchon/whatever I mean come on how pleb can you be if you so desperately pretend you're not.
>>8047120
Mind you I'm not saying there's anything wrong with reading Plato, but there's definitely something wrong if your list only contains the /lit/test /lit/ shit.
>>8047060
>>8047105
https://www.goodreads.com/author/show/6440536.Berna_Ojeda_Labourdette
>read (12268)
>Berna Labourdette read 1325 books of her goal of 800!
>>8047217
lol ridiculous
>>8047217
>https://www.goodreads.com/victoriayork
Also:
#1 top librarians
#1 top users
#1 top readers
#157 top reviewers
#13 best reviewers
#4 most followed
Clearly that's why she 'reads' so many books. And why would anyone want to follow her? Why do people look up to someone like this.
>>8047250
So how do you explain having already read 342 books by May?
>>8047217
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/53696949
lol look at this douche he reads 133 books a day
>47 books read this week
fucking wat
>>8047275
Well, 2 pages per minute, 15 hours a day is up to 1800 pages a day.
https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/51467241-patrick
I only browse /lit/.
>>8047273
Those rankings are regional, so if you live in some shitwater country you can easily make the rankings
>>8047280
Respect.
>>8046314
Yes, it's a great book. Very imaginative, from an interesting perspective. Really want to read The Door, but I can't get it anywhere. I'll add you.
https://www.goodreads.com/ihatehumans
>>8048276
That user lives in Mexico, so no wonder
I read like two books during the week, then up to two more on weekends. Best I can seem to manage having a full time job.
>>8049406
That's better than I've managed lately, you do you.
