Does /lit/ like Max Weber? Better than Marx? Worse?
Why compare him to Marx at all?
I've only read the Protestant Ethic. His ideas about capitalism becoming a cage are cool and all but the rise of social and liberal institutions after the second world war sort of make the context of capitalism different from the one in his time (and also Marx and Hegel).
Although one would argue, little has changed in developing countries, but Europe and North America have seen drastic changes in worker rights since the early 1900s
>>8010522
Strong critiques of capitalism.
>>8010536
>North America
>workers rights
laughingeuropeans.jpg
I don't like anyone.
>>8010512
>not posting Durkheim
enjoy your false epistemological ground.
Nonetheless Protestant Ethic is a good piece of work
>>8012843
Pfft, sure, and nobody's ever even heard of Robert "Iron Law of Oligarchy" Michels even though his conclusions are arguably more robust and applicable to contemporary society than either Weber or Durkheim.
Tho Weber's Protestant Ethic is a true masterpiece of historical sociology.
>>8010522
he criticizes materialism as the solo cause for capitalism, showing how ideal factors, like the protestant ethic, created the rational capitalist human.
>>8010512
I prefer Weber because his argument proves the role of the ideal on social change.
>>8012843
why would anyone like Durkheim nowadays, functionalism is dead. You clearly never read Weber on the methodology of the social sciences.
http://www.social-sciences-and-humanities.com/PDF/documents/weber_on_methodology.pdf
>>8012454
Canada gets 50 weeks? what is stopping them from having a baby every year
I really hope we aren't discussing "Mad" Max Weeabore the failed sociologist/"economist" with debunked ideas on individualism and
bureaucratic shill. Fucking leftist fascists.
>>8014697
tis shit
t. Bourdieu
>>8014858
>I prefer Weber because his argument proves the role of the ideal on social change.
what
