Why was he so based, /lit/?
>>7997966
>refuse empiricism
>based
>disproved and embarrassed by Sam harris
>based
>disproved and embarrassed by John Stuart Mill
>based
>get called an idiot by Nietzsche
>based
>>7997966
>theist
>based
>>7999171
>call your intellectual progenitor an idiot
>still completely captured by his frame of thinking
ayyyy
He is the most influential philosopher of all time, that is a fact.
>>7998122
Uh what?
>>7999410
>not Jesus Christ
>>7999410
Plato.
>>7999548
Kant actually existed, yes.
>>7999986
>So did Jesus Christ.
No.
>>8000006
Yes he did. I can't believe you don't know that. You must be a newfag.
>>8000029
Not everyone believes in your favorite mythological figures. Get out more.
>>8000073
If you want to be willfully ignorant to all of the secular and biblical evidence (The New Testament is the most verified document of all time) that is your choice. But just because you don't believe it doesn't make it not true.
>>8000097
Verified historical document*
>>8000097
>The New Testament is the most verified document of all time
Holy FUCK, you're delusional.
>>8000112
It literally is dumb dumb. Look it up for yourself, you're clearly a big fucking newfag and also not very bright.
There are more copies of the new Testament in existence than any other document of relatively close age, and as a translation accuracy of 99.5% which is far greater than any other.
Go back to /b/
>>8000112
Just read the first paragraph.
http://www.seeking4truth.com/historical_accuracy_of_the_bible.htm
>>8000125
The fact that a work of fiction has a low transcription error rate is utterly irrelevant. It's still fiction.
And btw, I know more about the composition of the NT than you ever will.
>>7997971
I'll tell you what rejects empiricism. Salmon geolocation
>>8000137
>work of fiction
>all archaeological discoveries have never proven the Bible to be incorrect, and in fact have corroborated what it says
Keep telling yourself that you pleb pseud.
>>8000112
I don't think he means verified in the way that you're thinking.
>>8000166
He is the definition of a stupid burger.
Clearly new and should really fuck off to his containment board.
>>8000006
>>8000073
Jesus' divinity and existence are two different issues. It would be insane given the evidence to claim that he didn't at least exist though. His influence during the period was probably really overblown by early Christians, and while he was one of many people who were called "prophets" or miracle performers at the time, that doesn't take away from the evidence we have that a person named Jesus was a real person and instigated the creation of Christianity.
>>8000173
Yeah after reading the rest of his posts I agree that he's retarded, but your posts also reek of euphoria. Tone it down a bit.
>>8000196
It's not about euphoria, it's about the facts. And if he wants to act like a retard, I'm going to treat him like one. I would expect you to do the same thing my friend.
>>8000208
Not even responding to him. You're ignoring facts if you say Jesus was a mythical, non existent person. Once again, no proof or evidence of him being God or divine, but there's enough evidence to reasonably assume there was a person named Jesus who was crucified and that his direct followers eventually would form Christianity (his brother James for instance).
>>8000190
No, the evidence points to Jesus being a mythological creation from the get-go.
>>8000230
>there's enough evidence to reasonably assume there was a person named Jesus who was crucified and that his direct followers eventually would form Christianity
There is no such evidence. Only myths.
>>8000280
No it doesn't. Even atheist scholars will tell you Jesus was a real person that existed.
>>8000394
No, they will not. See "On the Historicity of Jesus": http://www.amazon.com/Historicity-Jesus-Might-Reason-Doubt/dp/1909697494
>>8000427
>buying into the sensationalist Militant Atheism that is Richard Carrier.
You could have posted some book about Ancient Aliens and it would have as much validity.
LMAO @ ur existence
>>8000462
Thanks.
>>8000427
Get off of this board pleb.
>>8000462
Wow, you are quite the moron.
>>7999544
Mill absolutely butt blasts him when he explains utilitarianism
>>8000491
Topkek you can't even present a real argument all you have done is diverted and spout ad hominems literally go back to /b/
>>8000523
Project much?
>>8000531
Point proven. Go back to /b/ you underage plebbitor.
>>7997966
>Valjean turns himself in to the authorities despite all the positive effects his being the mayor has
>Javert follows the law to the point of autism
Did Hugo hate Kant?
