Not even a thread, let alone a sticky?
I guess all he did was win the Nobel Prize in 2002
You're right /lit/, good job
>>7874085
Nobel Prize, who cares? I bet I could win one if I really wanted to
>>7874085
All he did was complain about 'muh Auschwitz'
SO SORRY FOR NOT BEING SAD, FAG
I'LL JUST DO THIS OTHER COKE LINE AND CALL A HOOKER LATER
SORRY FOR NOT BEING SORRY
PS.
IM ACTUALLY REALLY NOT SORRY
PEOPLE DIE DEAL WITH IT
CHEEZ
>>7874085
Yeah man, the Nobel is pretty much meaningless.
I've read Union Jack and Fatelessness
I enjoyed Union Jack, he seems to shine more in stories and novellas
The Nobel Prize of literature is the oldest meme.
Even my literature professor says so :
It's not given to merit, but to strategic demographics
>>7874134
Is this real?
>>7874179
ur prof is a failed goof
>>7874179
I'm gonna go ahead and assume "strategic demographics" is some thinly veiled racism. It's actually given to "the most outstanding work in an ideal direction." It's the Nobel committee's idea of an "ideal direction" that most people take issue with.
>>7874126
so it goes
>>7874939
Are you f'ing stupid?
>>7875188
>literary skills
>couldn't even finish a book
>>7874085
There was a thread for him yesterday fuccboi
If we haven't read him, what do you want us to say about him? You can't expect each and every person here to have read the whole oeuvre of each Nobel laureate - a Nobel prize win doesn't mean an author is at all well-read, influential or even good.
>>7875207
Why would you flaunt your failure like that?
>>7874939
unfortunately, yes
