Heidegger literally spent his life looking after his wifes son (that wasn't his, she cheated on him with an Arab immigrant)
Doesn't this kind of nullify his entire argument.
Rationally speaking why would you willingly follow someones opinion who lives this kind of lifestyle.
>>7844924
and if that didn't turn you off him then check this out
he was literally a manlet cuck
short Nazi cuck
>>7844926
What does that picture even insinuate?
>>7844938
that he is a manlet
Geil schwanz.
>>7844924
he had like 3+mistresses, still a cuck but i think because he was cheating he let it slide.
>>7844926
>nazi heidegger
Whoa! What a revelation OP! Who would have thought that racist assholes would be cucks, when cuckoldry is literally the most racist fetish a person can possibly have?
Not sure how that has any bearing on the covering-up of the question of being. Could you elaborate?
>>7845006
>racist
>1900s
i don't know mate if you know what that means in the given context.
>>7845009
can a philosopher be a nazi a cuck ?
>>7845009
More so the authentic living. he was living a lie yet he told himself he wasn't
>>7845009
Existential ontology is hokum, lass. He did manage to scribble a couple god-tier essays though ("The Question Concerning Technology" and "What is Metaphysics").
>implying an argument has to be sustained by the author's lifestyle
>>7845055
>implying it doesnt
The question of the meaning of being was never forgotten. It is just that most honest people, including philosophers, from the beginning of time, realize that existence is a really weird thing (and by thing I do not mean substance) and there is no point in trying to understand it by erecting boring, obscurantist philosophical systems sustained by a few interesting ideas buried in a mountain of empty concepts.
>>7845067
ummm it definitely doesn't...
>>7845001
kek.
Yeah, so what? Schopenhauer fucked poodles. Nobody spoke ill of him.
>>7845076
lets just agree to disagree
>>7845082
"Ad hominem tu quoque (literally: "You also") refers to a claim that the source making the argument has spoken or acted in a way inconsistent with the argument. In particular, if Source A criticizes the actions of Source B, a tu quoque response is that Source A has acted in the same way. This argument is false because it does not disprove the premise; if the premise is true then Source A may be a hypocrite, but this does not make the statement less credible from a logical perspective."
let's just agree that you're wrong lmao
>>7845101
stop defending yourself cuckboy
>>7845101
>literally defending a cuck
>>7845137
you going off to prep the bull?
>>7845101
Why would you trust a fat person's advice on exercise?
literally 360 no-scope, shrekt, btfo
>>7845231
el mao
100% grade A btfo
eat poison my friend
>>7845240
what??
Heidegger would probably vote sanders
>>7845069
you're such a faggot it hurts to know you exist, you smug piece of shit.
inb4 i'm in the bottom level of your shitty pyramid. fuck you.
Heidegger is probably one of the best case-studies in "can a person's work be separated from their life." You know, because of the nazism, not this petty shit you fags care about. Jaspers cut off contact from him and his thought completely; Arendt, who was Jewish, still dick-rode his thought after the nazi shit; Levinas thought his entire philosophical approach betrays nazi tendencies.
I say humans gonna human; if a philosopher led a perfect life entirely consistent with what they said, a) they'd never exist b) they'd probably be boring as fuck.
>>7845069
I'd give you a solid "Responding to Tone," no better.
>>7844926
he looks like koksal baba
>>7845687
I see you haven't read Heidegger's Black Notebooks until 1948 (understandably, they only just came out in German)
They're all about how the Jews are trying to subvert Germans, how the Germans will go under because of the Jews, and how the post-war years were treason for the "German mission", there's nothing there where you can separate the person from the life
>>7845703
I haven't read them but I'm well aware that he was a nazi through-and-through.
>there's nothing there where you can separate the person from the life
what? a person is their life; it's their work that is a different matter.
>>7844926
heidegger, faulkner, mishima, jarry
>tfw most of your favorite writers are manlets
>>7844926
René Char was a very tall man. Look at pictures of him with Camus, it's even more embarrassing (for the other party).
>>7845695
kek
>>7845666
best thing i've seen on 4chan in a long time.
even doubles as best response to heidegger
>>7845226
When an alcoholic tells you to stop drinking he may have a point although being hypocritical.
Lmao
in one of his works the abbreviation "n.soz." was edited to "naturwissenschaft"
>>7846026
The correct comparison is a fat person's advice on weight loss, not exercise.
>>7846080
>>7845226
A fat person might be more concerned about weight loss than a person who's never had that problem. Even if he failed in practice, it doesn't mean that he can't be right in theory, much like a moron could give a correct answer for very wrong reasons.
There are probably ways to do ad hominems legitimately though, but with limited results. Like what Nietzsche hesitantly (and people don't realize this enough due to Freddy's polemical style) does with Socrates/Plato: perhaps the ugly, fat and mad (speaking to a daemon) Socrates, from an Athens that lost the war with Sparta and was in a "worldly" failing period, might have postulated his metaphysics of the Heaven of Ideas (whether it was Socrates or Plato matters less here) just as a priestly escape fueled by ressentiment.
Maybe the same can be done with Heidegger's philosphy and connections to Nazism, but it shouldn't boil down to "lel manlet cuck hates life" since Heidegger's concerns were a bit different than Plato's and the culture and context were different as well ("But ugliness, in itself an objection, is among the Greeks almost a refutation").
>>7846107
I was agreeing with that sentiment, the fat person could likely know something about weight loss. I was saying they probably don't know anything about exercise, or at least there's no reason to believe they do.
Heidegger wasn't a cuck. He was just a bitter dude.
He cheated on his wife serially and only wrote in a letter he thought one son wasn't his.
It was some Jew who turned that brief mention in a letter into an entire book to try and make money.
Jews hate heidegger because he never apologized for being a nazi, and because he is an anchor for modern nationalism. He also cucked his Jew professor and his bratwurst was in all of Hannah A's holes and it was so good she excused him off war crimes.
The effort to discredit big H is clearly for a reason.
>>7845001
This pic suddenly became savage
>>7845001
toppppestpppkekkk
>>7844924
>cucked by a muslim
>hate jews
literally /pol/
>>7845001
brutal.
Does everything come back to the Tao?
From Wikipedia: Some have argued for an origin of Dasein in Chinese philosophy and Japanese philosophy: according to Tomonobu Imamichi, Heidegger's concept of Dasein was inspired — although Heidegger remained silent on this — by Okakura Kakuzo's concept of das-in-der-Welt-sein (being-in-the-worldness, worldliness) expressed in The Book of Tea to describe Zhuangzi's Taoist philosophy, which Imamichi's teacher had offered to Heidegger in 1919, after having followed lessons with him the year before.
>>7845001
WEW LAD.
E
W
L
A
D
.
>>7845687
Schmitt is another case, and he refused denazification and had to live the rest of his life outside society. Now his works wanked over by the New Left
>>7844924
>look it up
>its true
well shit
im with
>>7844989
philosophy majors btfo
so it all reduces to manletism once again...
coincidence?`?
>>7847987
To be fair Carl had a comfy as fuck little cottage in his home town where he lived the rest of his life taking long walks, writing whatever he wanted, and hosting sycophants from across the spectrum.
I bet he had a nice little stockpile of Kristalnacht money to keep him going.
>>7849563
I'm a manlet. Does that mean I'm a great philosopher and also a nazi?
>>7844924
nah
>>7844926
All great writers are manlets.
>>7845914
>over 6'
>genius
Pick one
>>7849612
>Tao Lin
>great writer
ayyyyy
>>7849652
>not liking tao lin
ayyyyy
>>7844926
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
But seriously: Kant-never married
Schopenhauer-humiliated by grape girl
Nietzsche-hung around Ree and Salome awkwardly
Were any philosophers actually successful with women?
The French ones. Only the Germans had problems
>>7851474
There are no great french philosophers post Malebranche/Descartes
Sorry
