Was he a proto-Marxist?

Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-03-13 18:35:15Post No. 7807357
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: Dickens_Gurney_head[1].jpg (160KB, 814x1190px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

160KB, 814x1190px

Anonymous 2016-03-13 18:35:15 Post No. 7807357 [Report]

Was he a proto-Marxist?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:00:05 Post No.7807756
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:00:05 Post No.7807756 [Report]

But was it rape OP?

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:04:49 Post No.7807780
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:04:49 Post No.7807780 [Report]

absolutely

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:06:45 Post No.7807789
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:06:45 Post No.7807789 [Report]

>>7807357
>does concern for children and the poor equate to Marxism?
also
>proto-

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:09:34 Post No.7807803
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:09:34 Post No.7807803 [Report]

>>7807789
dickens hated the colonialist 19th century british bureaucracy and was pretty deeply concerned with class and the means of production, altogether desu pretty marxist

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:16:26 Post No.7807828
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:16:26 Post No.7807828 [Report]

>>7807803
Yeah I'd say he was some sort of socialist. No wonder neo/lit/ hates him.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:36:53 Post No.7807912
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:36:53 Post No.7807912 [Report]

There were tons of socialisms in Europe during the latter half of the 19th century.

Marx was only one among many. ~~the only right one in any case~~

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:43:28 Post No.7807932
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:43:28 Post No.7807932 [Report]

File: 1443484668816.jpg (240KB, 1656x1009px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

240KB, 1656x1009px

>>7807912
>He thinks Marx was right.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:45:44 Post No.7807940
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-13 20:45:44 Post No.7807940 [Report]

Just because something has the word 'Social' in it, doesn't mean it's Socialism.

The best thing that Righties could do right now is divorce pretty important things like 'Social Welfare' from the Left, and make them neutral again.

Even better, if they insist upon the strictest definition of Socialism as being nothing more than public ownership of the means of productions; which thus renders it little more than a quirky idea and a niche ideology.