ITT: Terrible literature

>>7804214
You just revealed your own ignorance. Its horror, not literature, and its pretty good for horror

>>7804221
>Its horror
It's a thinly-veiled commentary on theory and the concept of representation. I hesitate even to say "thinly-veiled" because I'm not sure if it's veiled at all.

A great novel. A phenomenal debut. Thrillingly alive, sublimely creepy, distressingly scary, breathtakingly intelligent —it renders most other fiction meaningless. One can imagine Thomas Pynchon, J. G. Ballard, Stephen King, and David Foster Wallace bowing at Danielewski's feet, choking with astonishment, surprise, laughter, awe.

>>7805240
>One can imagine Thomas Pynchon, J. G. Ballard, Stephen King, and David Foster Wallace bowing at Danielewski's feet, choking with astonishment, surprise, laughter, awe.
no one cannot

>>7805240
>googles the quote
>first result is "avidreader.com"
>a thousand keks

>>7804221
>Its horror, not literature

This is cringeworthy

>>7804229
Spot on.

>>7805262
Terrible cover.