Good books not often discussed on /lit/ thread

The Quran

File: New-James-Bond-Spectre-Trailer-Released.png (111KB, 768x424px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

111KB, 768x424px

>>7802331
is that what they based the latest james bond movie off of

>>7802371
i hope not

>>7800054
bump

>>7800087
this is one of my favourite books
why isnt shirley jackson ever mentioned on /lit/?
i guess she isnt that literary
the birds nest is good too

>>7802331
mentioned here quite frequently desu

>>7802641
Absolutely based, Tanizaki is my favourite Japanese writer.

File: soleil.jpg (62KB, 400x586px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

62KB, 400x586px

& Léon Bloy

ITT: Shitty books

>>7800054
>implying any book ever actually gets discussed here, good or bad

>>7803378
Agreed. OP is a naive faggot. /lit/ is all about being a pseud.

>>7803302
how often would you like it to be discussed? I see thread pretty often

>>7802006
Had my sights on this one for a while but the size of it daunts me.

>>7803021
Been looking for a digital copy of this for years...

>>7803790
Same here. Maybe not for years, but for some time. I found a French pdf, that's about it.

>>7800087
>>7802635
i have seen this a lot on the "recommended" displays in bookshops recently. i think it's because this year is the 100th anniversary of her birth, or possibly because last year was the 50th anniversary of her death, or both, or something.

>>7803949
made me feel like I was going through early onset male menopause. The book is the literary equivalent of those old women on the street corner who play cards and bingo.

>>7800054
/lit/'s usually terrible at discussing things so keeping good books to yourself isn't a bad thing in the context of this board.