Jungfag here. I've read enough of Jung (including his earlier papers with Freud's work). My question is, is Freud not too outmoded to be worth a read? If so, which papers ad/or books would you suggest?
>>7790749
He was wrong about many things but that doesn't make him less important.
Civilization and Its Discontents
The Interpretation of Dreams
Beyond the Pleasure Principle
>>7790749
reading Jung and not reading Freud is like watching the goodfather 3, without watching The goodfather 1.
Read Melanie Klein and then the object relations theorists
>>7790776
This.
>>7790868
Stupid analogy.
Jung's psychology is more logically advanced and is complete on its own; hardly a sequel. Its more like T2 to Terminator.
>>7790776
I would include Uber Coca just because its great to see somebody write about their substance abuse
>>7790898
Jung's conception of the shadow aspect alone essentially encompasses the entirety of Freud's conceptions of the unconscious.
>>7790898
*hardly an inferior sequel
You know what I mean, but I'm patching it up anyway.
>>7790898
No, all the important concepts are from Dr Freud.
>>7790942
>bait
ok i respond 2 u
>>7790776
I would add The Ego and the Id to that list.
>>7791669
The uncanny proved that when Freud wrote about aesthetics he was at his least autistic.
