Raskolnikov was a pleb
You are currently reading a thread in /lit/ - Literature
> Napoleon was the shit, he wouldn't hessitate to blast this bitch with an axe.
> Oh no, I hate myself for realizing that Im not able to utilize my crime as im beta as fuck
> Im not ubermench, ill lie down on this marvelous ottoman and hate myself and everyone for trying to help a beta fuck.
Was he right?
>>7747666
guys it's a trick, satan is trying to trick you into doubting god's laws
dont respond
>>7747666
I mean, he was kinda right. Don't you ever feel bad about not being able to save minorities from autocratic objectification in nonspecific atlantic industries?
>>7747666
Do you guys ever fear that reducing a complex character arch into three lines of greentext is damaging our ability to have actual discussion? The question has now been framed so that we are not discussing Raskolnikov's internal flaws, but rather whether or not he is a "beta pleb".
Anyway I think that Raskolnikov was destined from the start to fail to be an extraordinary man. He had to artificially create a climate of poverty and hopelessness (by isolating himself from his friends and refusing to try to earn money) in order to justify his act to himself. Because he was unable to commit the murder outside of these circumstances, he could not possibly be extraordinary.
>>7747666
>thinking raskolnikov was supposed to be anything other than a pleb