Thoughts?
Thoughts
It's a really cool book
Really enjoyed it. The narrator switches were both interesting and effective storytelling tools. It also had a lot of nuanced symbolism and interplay between the characters.
I liked it, more than gatsby actually. it's not as flawless but IMO it's more honest
the true patrician choice for fitzgerald fans. plebs will choose great gatsby. posers will choose this side of paradise. idiots will choose the other book, but this truly showed what fitzgerald could have been. shame it too though is still incredibly flawed.
Too tender for me, eventually I like to swallow.
>>7744132
Fitz's heaviest, most powerful work. The last page is fucking heart wrenching and will secure his stature as one of the greatest American writers in history.
Its been years since I read it, but if I had to pick a flaw, it's the one I end up mentioning every time I talk about the novels of Fitzgerald: it chooses sentimentality over comedy, or genuity of any kind.
>>7744358
>will secure his stature as one of the greatest American writers in history.
>will
Not 'did', or, 'has'?
Can you qualify this a bit?
Half of these comments read like goodreads reviews
>>7744378
Yeah cause your post was so great, keep em coming
>>7744360
Not him, but only time can tell with these things.
That being said, a lot of time as already past.
*clarify?
>>7744132
I've started it twice, but each time I got bombarded by the number of characters all introduced at once and didn't continue.
>>7744471
You are entertainingly unhelpful.
I really, really like that cover
>>7744262
This side of paradise sucked. Haven't read the OP but I do not believe Gatsby deserves the hate it gets
>>7744527
/lit/ just hates Gatsby because it's popular and accessible.
i've only started it once and put it down after a bit, i intend to pick it up again though since my dad loves fitzgerald i'm interested to see what he likes about it.
i also love this cover