is this graph accurate?

>>7742934

No dude that's way off. Someone clearly exploited the security weaknesses of that Windows XP and/or that Java install and hacked some seriously misleading info into there.

>>7742934
It is. When it comes to influence, no one has escaped Kant in the last two centuries. Connections and names are lacking, but what the image shows is accurate.

>>7742966
underrated post

Hegel should be more notable on the graph.

Eh.I know that Kant is influential but can I skip him if I suspect he's going to bore me to death?
Can I understand Hegel without Kant?

>>7742934
no

>>7742934
>is this graph accurate?

It's obviously a digraph you pleb.

>>7743099
>Can I understand Hegel without Kant?

Not really.

>>7742977
K thx