Kingkiller Triolgy
- Home
- Board: /lit/ - Literature
- Reading: Kingkiller Triolgy
Thoughts on the first two books? I needed something to fill the void left by GRRM. I have to say I have enjoyed very much.
not literature
>>7723107
Lit hates them. I thought they were ok. First was much better than the second
>>7723115
Oh...I expected as much. Apparently only novels that you personally derive no enjoyment from are fit for discussion on /lit/; as evidenced by the response above. Very insightful it was.
>>7723136
this is a literature board. liking a book doesn't make it literature.
>>7723150
And not liking a book doesn't mean it doesn't qualify as literature. This board is just as bad as /tv/. It's a fucking cancer.
>>7723107
Its the literature equivalent of kino.
They're great. Fuck /lit/, just read 'em.
>>7723167
Do you even read your posts? Oy vey.
>>7723243
I agree with this
>>7723167
Then leave and don't come back.
Like you, OP, I too enjoy shit from time to time but please spare us your indignation when you're called a shit-eater for it.
It's Wizard Gary Stu: The Novel so I dunno what you were expecting from here.
