1. They should be reasonably modern, post-1950 or so.
2. No sci-fi or fantasy. Fuck that shit.
3. Uh...it should be good.
I honestly don't know what to read next. This happens sometimes. I often just read the next book by an author I like, but nothing comes to mind at the moment. Oh, and City On Fire, recommended to me by this board two months ago, was meh.
if you fear disappointment you should make your needs a bit more precise
>Recommend me books.
Nah. If you looked through any of the existing threads you'd have found some books that match your stipulations. Instead, you asked us to work for you. You can go fuck yourself.
Well, City on Fire clearly broke the third rule, didn't it?
I dunno. Just something that'll entertain me. A wide open field should allow people to respond more easily. I just want something fun to read.
>>7657163
>1. They should be reasonably modern, post-1950 or so.
>>>/r/books
do your own research faggot, there are tons of charts everwhere on this board, just lurk.
why do some people insist on having their hand held during every small decision they make.
>>7657191
I honestly don't know what to read next. I just wanted a few suggestions. This board was a LOT more helped maybe 3 years ago.
