![witty-sarcastic-ecards-12-400x250[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/lpEznUF.png "witty-sarcastic-ecards-12-400x250[1]")
>reading Deleuze and Guattari's Capitalism and Schizophrenia
>can't take it seriously because I know I'm smarter than the guys who wrote it
>end up putting the book down to go browse /lit/
Anybody else ever have this problem? It might be unique because I only read literature written by people I assume are more intelligent than me.
Naturally this leaves me with a smaller selection of available books to read than some of you might have
I don't presume to know the intelligences of the--
Oh this is bait. Nice image faggot.
someone's really butthurt freud doesn't explain their incest fetish
>>7643155
>I only read literature written by people I assume are more intelligent than me.
You have read House of Leaves by Mark Z. Danielewski, haven't you?
>>7643208
that's cold even for french banter m8
I bet you subvocalize, tho
>>7643155
Capitalism and Schizophrenia is logical conclusion of western thought though.
>>7643185
Is this bait? Incest was Freud's obsession. That's common sense. Even illiterates know this.
>>7643605
yeah, but D&G destroyed Freud's theories
>>7643609
dolce and gabbana?
