Paul Virilio worth reading? I've never seen him mentioned

Thread replies: 15
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-01-17 01:23:57 Post No. 7594225
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 51QAu4+PkaL._SX322_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (48 KB, 324x499) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:23:57 Post No. 7594225 [Report]

Paul Virilio worth reading? I've never seen him mentioned on /lit/

I am becoming more interested in the very furthest over the edge social/cultural theory, way past foucault and frankfurtschool et al.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:26:55 Post No.7594240
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:26:55 Post No.7594240 [Report]

virilio isn't in the super radical foucaultian branch of social theory, more from marshall mcluhan "i don't know what the fuck im sayiing but it sound deep to dumb ppl" school of critical studies

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:44:32 Post No.7594270
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:44:32 Post No.7594270 [Report]

>>7594240
yeah, that is why i described it as 'furthest over the edge'. What i meant I guess was most crazy/outthere/nonsensical/weird. I've read enough foucault and his ilk for awhile

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:45:57 Post No.7594278
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:45:57 Post No.7594278 [Report]

>>7594270
foucault is very sensible though there really isn't anything "weird" in it...

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:58:38 Post No.7594308
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 01:58:38 Post No.7594308 [Report]

>>7594240

DING DING DING

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:08:40 Post No.7594330
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:08:40 Post No.7594330 [Report]

>>7594278
yeah that is why i dont want to read the sensible guy anymore, I want to read the best nonsense

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:16:16 Post No.7594355
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:16:16 Post No.7594355 [Report]

>>7594330
some freshmens and other little kids take the situationists seriously but i think its funny nonesense u cud try them

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:18:25 Post No.7594363
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:18:25 Post No.7594363 [Report]

>>7594225
read vilem flusser instead

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:36:16 Post No.7594401
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 02:36:16 Post No.7594401 [Report]

>>7594363
nice. it seems like I can't escape phenomenology. looks like I'll have to deal with Husserl eventually.
>>7594355
I liked vaneigem, and loved debord's aphorisms, but it's been forever since I've read their books

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:11:12 Post No.7594778
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:11:12 Post No.7594778 [Report]

>>7594225
i've only read pic related but I remember very much enjoying it. so yeah...

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:50:59 Post No.7594860
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:50:59 Post No.7594860 [Report]

deleuzeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:55:21 Post No.7594866
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:55:21 Post No.7594866 [Report]

>>7594860
>>
oo good suggestions

or maybe all those cute semiotext(e) booklets

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:57:14 Post No.7594867
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 05:57:14 Post No.7594867 [Report]

>>7594225
I'm amazed anyone reads this shit at all. Take a hold of your prick and let that guide you for once. If that's too vulgar, "follow your heart."

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 06:10:36 Post No.7594885
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 06:10:36 Post No.7594885 [Report]

File: 0445-01_TP[1].jpg (24 KB, 300x514) Image search: [Google]

24 KB, 300x514

If you haven't read this, particularly Volume II, then drop all the fanciful semiotexte trendy shit and get to it.

>>

Anonymous 2016-01-17 14:56:35 Post No.7595647
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-01-17 14:56:35 Post No.7595647 [Report]

>>7594885
is David Harvey's guided videos and book good to use to get through it?