where do I start with this memer?
Genealogy of Morals or Beyond Good and Evil
not memeing: aristotle and plato and schopenhauer
if you go into nietzsche without a bases in at least aristotle and plato you'll never understand anything he says and end up a teenage edgelord
>>7577824
surely for schopenhauer you need Kant as he explicitly says so? Or not
>>7577782
Birth of Tragedy and then Geneaology of Morals. And then stop.
>>7577824
is a general entry level philosophy 101 understanding of aristotle and plato enough to move onto nietzsche or do I need to tip my fedora a bit more?
>>7577857
I think: Plato>Aristotle >Kant >Upanishads >Schopenhauer >Nietzsche if you really want to understand it.
>>7577866
Nah bro
Schopenhauer > Plato > Aristotle > Kant >Nietzsche > Upanishads
Schopenhauer him can explain Kant better than you alone could understand.
First, read Nietzsche.
Next, read a bunch of other guys.
Then, go back to Nietzsche.
After that, read other guys, then Nietzsche, then other guys, then Nietzsche...
Keep up this process until you die.
Start with Aristophanes
>>7578380
Schops before the Greeks? Really?
What's the reasoning for that
>>7578559
It's a collection of eastern philosophy. Very long. The Baghavad Gita is a good starter to Eastern philosophy, is short and could probably be read first while the Upanishads are saved for last due to their length.
>>7578589
Nice pepe reference but he's not philosophy.
Beyond good and evil
