Analytic and Continental Philosophy

>>7574385
Don't feel with all the shitposting going on you will be able to slip past.

>>>/his/phil

Enjoy your week ban.

What do hardcore analytics even fucking do?

Serious question. I am continental as shit and I literally never run into anything analytic except maybe Pooper.

>>7574385
That image is horribly inaccurate.

>>7574464
what a dick. thanks for keeping /lit/ shit

>>7574385
both are jewish bullshit and sophistry

>>7574497
They work on small problem states that other analytics work on. It really depends on their areas of expertise. I can't really go ahead and list all these various problems and sub-problems, but if they're an epistemologist then they'll study the justification of knowledge. If they're a metaphysician, then they'll study fundamentality, ground, de re modality, universals, causality, etc. In phil of lang, things like meaning, reference, truth, and what a proposition is.
It's all about bit sized problem states that can be handled in the space of a journal article. The grand system building of Great Philosophers is a thing of the past in analytic philosophy.

>>7574497
>analytic except maybe Pooper.
>Popper
No one cares about Popper these days. You're decades away from contemporary thought. Furthermore, contemporary analytics, autism-wise, blow Popper out of the water.

>>7574520
My dick is always ready for your boipucci bby.

Watch me sage, watch me hide it.

continental is more fun and honestly explains society and life and people better. we're not plants or something