Does this ever start to be less wordy, or at least with more direction? The imagery and dialogue are fantastic, but few and far between passages that contain references I don't think I'm understanding.
I loved V. and enjoyed Lot 49 but this book is making me feel pretty dumb so far.
It be like it is
>>7569376
>hasn't read Gravity's Rainbow before
>is either too stupid or too lazy to search online for a companion guide
>incorrect usage of the idiom "few and far between"
>is a "dumb" person by self-admission
Stop posting here please
>>7569399
>needing a companion guide
Take your own advice and get back to Reddit
Yeah, it gets a lot easier in Parts 2 and 3. Part 4 loses any sense of coherency gained in 2 and 3 though, but it's an enjoyable journey for its own reasons.
>>7569511
Also, I'd leave out any complex analysis for your first run through the book. It's an experience on the first run through.
On subsequent readings you can go through it with a fine tooth comb.
Im on page 700. Gonna finish it tonight lads!
>>7569511
I don't get this
I find Part I to be by far the most straightforward
>>7569403
This is the most retarded thing I've seen today
>>7569602
>it wasn't even funny
>he still proved his point
>>7569594
congrats you haven't finished reading Gravity's Rainbow
>>7569403
>needing a companion guide
>for a book
>book considered "good"
In b4 "pleb just doesn't understand."
It's a joke you need a guide to read a book. Postmodernism killed literature. It's probably for the best.
>>7569622
I've finished reading it three times
>>7569399
Readers guide
>>7569806
Dante makes postmodernism look light on references. Saying "wahh it's too hard" isn't a criticism.
>>7569555
Now EVERYBODY
