Where do you even go for literary analyses? Like if you're reading a classic novel, and want to explore further what it means and stuff like that. I want to read really mind blowing essays that makes me think of the work or literature in general in a new light. All I can find online are sparknotes sites, which are okay but not the most enlightening, and youtube is useless for literary shit.
scholar.google.com
>>7500975
jstor
>>7500975
I sincerely hate everyone who enjoys this piece of shit show. I want to pour glue into these two faggots' mouth and keep punching their stupid face untill all of their teeth falls out like two fists and shove those far up their asses.
>>7500981
this
also, tvtropes can be good if you know how to navigate it
>>7501053
literally no it can't unless you're just looking for an example of something
it's the plebbiest shit ever plebbed
>>7500981
note: scholar.google.com isn't like regular google.com. Relevant results will be sparse and you'll find the best gems buried down in like p.15 of results or whatever. 99% of results will be useless "[Citation]"s
>>7501073
go to /r9k/ you autistic never-publish
>>7501015
most people who like it are in their 30s and 40s and work 9 to five jobs as either technicians or programmers or IT specialists or whatever
it's about the same level of lame as XKCD, so you don't exactly get the best and brightest liking it. Goes to show that most Math/Science people who stay in their Math/Science holes lack any critical thinking skills, I suppose.
Just goes to show how infantalized we are as a nation anymore
>>7501113
XKCD is pretty autistic and generally unfunny but it's miles ahead of the Big Bang Theory. At least the author actually worked for NASA and his "what-if" scenarios are interesting.
>>7501091
>mfw i have been published already
>>7501081
But it's good for getting an overview of a topic and find the most defining papers within that topic. Hence "stand on the shoulders of giants".
>>7501113
To say STEM majors are infantile is rather quite unfair; I know for a fact that /sci/ detests BBT & XKCD, and most STEM majors I know of loathe this content as well.
>>7500975
Norton critical editions friend
>>7501113
hating a popular comedy doesn't mean you have critical thinking.
>>7502675
No, people in STEM fields shouldn't have bad taste in entertainment or be near illiterate
>>7500975
Hey anon, look what I got you since you love books and philosophy so much
>>7501165
Nice name/s
>>7503083
Alot of people go to university to get a job after, so they only use their knowledge as a tool. Instead of actually apriciating the knowledge and having a geniuen intrest.
You see this in every education.
