no lol. murakami is a hack and the only people who recommend him are pseudointellectual retards who think they're /deep/ and they'r reading something /intelligent/

>>7459942
>>7459954
>Hey /lit/, d-do I fit in yet?

>>7459967
/lit/ has a pretty fucking big portion of people who love murakami/will defend him, which isn't surprising since a significant portion of /lit/ is comprised of said pseudointellectual retards

no, quality doesn't fluctuate much

>>7459942
He's just a chink kissing up to ghostfuckers. He has no dignity and it shows in his deplorable writing. White yuppies eat it up because it solidifies their biases.

>>7459942
no, this is a mediocre un-unique book about heteronormativity and its pitfalls and belongs in the theatre in england in 1880 and that is not a compliment
>>7459954
come now, some murakami is good. have you read get me out of here, the poetry collection?

>>7459942
You chose to read one of his worst books and now you're complaining about
Do you hate yourself?

reading it for the cute Japanese girls alone is worth it.

>>7460081
What other books have qt asian chicks in them?

He had a memory of his mom's nipples getting sucked

>>7460083
any japanese lit

>>7460083

Any book that describes a woman as asian or that doesn't explicity state a woman's ethnicity.