Is this edition any good? I know the penguin deluxe edition should be avoided but what about this penguin edition? Or should I just stick to the Vintage classics one?
>>7443416
The penguin deluxe edition is fine now. They got rid of the errors.
Stop perpetuating this meme.
>>7443416
In the same vein, is this edition any good?
>>7443416
i checked it out, and it doesnt have the deluxe error, so i'm going with it. who knows, though!
>>7443433
not even fit for toilet paper
>>7443433
>>7443433
that's the deluxe with the error,
from amazon:
An example, pp. 139-140, last sentence:
...Your task, in the dreams, is often to [cross under the trees through the shadows before something hap] pens.
>>7443454
it has some passages missing from what I can recall
>>7443463
Damn, welp looks like I got some shopping to do at some point. Thanks for the help.
Not OP but I've been wondering the same thing
>>7443433
My copy with the same cover doesn't have this error. It's a conspiracy, man.
>>7443546
I checked the pages that one Anon pointed out, looks like I have one with errors.
>>7443440
I have the fuck ugly Brit version of GR, the text itself inside is fine, I see no blurriness or smudging. But yeah, they're god awful to look at.
>>7443475
This thread comes up every now and again.from what I recall, the mistakes are few in number and the missing passage was more like a missing half of a sentence. It's bullshit from a consumer POV but not worth purchasing another copy.
>>7443586
That is true, guess I just feel kinda gipped is all.
Maybe we should get back to the main question....
>>7443416
read this copy this summer...some where printing on the odd 3-4 pages, really faint or really thick, but not huge fuck-ups. worked just fine. go in head first.
>>7443567
This one? Because this is a gorgeous cover, and if you don't want we can work out a deal.
Anyone else have this version? Mine doesn't have that book award thing in the middle, and I'm glad it doesn't.
>>7444852
I assume he means the awful 'Where's Waldo' cover.
>>7443546
Mine has no error there either. This version got me through a grad seminar, looks awesome all taped together with all the white faded to yellow. Not that the other versions aren't cool too.
>>7443437
>>7443440
>>7443441
>>7443463
>>7443503
kys
>>7445816
thumbnail always reminds of kkk
>>7443567
at least it's better than vintage's hbtq edition
PENS PENS PENS
>>7445172
I went to b&n to buy that v today—someone had snatched it since I was there last week. So I got the sexy new v of pic related.
>>7446063
>hbtq
wat?
>>7446168
postage stamps look like acid tabs
how did i not see this before
>>7446270
i have this copy, and it's one of the first things i noticed. i love the cover, in fact, the "stamp" in the middle is a serrated punch-out
>>7446303
It FEELS so nice.
I also got pic related.
