Do you think tweeting has any literary value?
Have you read Selected Tweets? Anything of value in it or just nonsensical dribble? Opinions on Mira, David, Tao, Darcie, etc.?
And of course: follow for follow
>>7436224
I don't know if it's the character limit, but a lot of tweets look like they were written by sad, handicapped people.
>>7436250
It's what's "in"
It feels more like anti-literature
I use Twitter to exercise word economy. I don't think it has any real literary value unless you're doing a Felix Feneon/Lydia Davis microfiction thing.
It's an ADD's dream.
>>7436345
nightmare
no. its fucking retarded and the people in it are so pompous and think they're the next "Rebels" that dave pinky nosed foster wallace was talking about.
but no there fucking losers who think their humour will get them anywhere
pro-tip, watch weird twitter live shows on youtube and you will see how just fucking pathetic these people are
all of the great writers of the last 200 years didn't die for these pseudo-intellectual neo-nu males to tweet some fucking garbage soup
>>7436224
>Do you think tweeting has any literary value?
yes. it reminds me of ἐπίγραμμα. people just don't like them here because normies can use it, so their normie senses get triggered.
>>7436351
>all of the great writers of the last 200 years didn't die for these pseudo-intellectual neo-nu males to tweet some fucking garbage soup
What. Did they all die under the conditions of a martyr, and for words? This comment doesn't even make sense.
>>7436358
Has anyone tried doing Dorian Gray via twitter?
Or anything by wilde, reallyCarpets, carpets, carpets, carpets everywhere, and curtains, with tassles, also books with tassles. Vases! And foreign music and stuff.
>>7436351
lol u mad bro xD
>Obama chuckled. "You mean the chaos emeralds?"
>>7436224
It depends on who is tweeting. As far as literary style goes, it is aphoristic like writings of Pascal or Nietzsche.
>>7436505
yeah fiction txt is pretty good
anyone into language art and shit like that, check out this guy named @turnt_turn
>>7436355
I have no idea why I follow her but I do
>>7437485
We are subjects of the matriarchy.
