not really. faulkner in translation is missing the entire point and there's legitimately no reason to read darwin at all.

the middle book is fine, dublineers is translatable, can' say about woolf.

test

No, m8. Why do you translation? I'm disappointed in you...

>>7402734
Not jew, but it was pretty cheap, mate.

>>7402593
>unironically reading Virginia Fucking Woolf
>reading primary material from Darwin instead of 30 or so textbook pages that would lay out a modern and altogether more complete and correct model

>>7402784
There's nothing wrong with reading about the base of the evolution.

>>7402602
>not really. faulkner in translation is missing the entire point

faulkner isn't shakespeare, his prose isn't much to talk about and it's easy to translate

>>7402593
>leyendo Ulysses en español

>>7402784
>unironically reading Virginia Fucking Woolf
I'll be able to understand what a woman really thinks if I read Virginia Woolf?

>>7403912
>thinks
You've already failed senpai

>>7403738
i'd like to see you translate his phonetic southern drawl into spanish

>>7403738
>his prose isn't much to talk about

Modern /lit, everyone.