>It's a Schwarzkommando chapter.
>>7394247
You know what the whole Schwarzkommando thing reminds me of? How we used to troll about this here being a catholic board, and then one day real ones popped up, seemingly out of nowhere, like they'd always existed.
A-and then the antinatalism fad landed for a couple months... Eerie...
>>7394342
>How we used to troll about this here being a catholic board, and then one day real ones popped up, seemingly out of nowhere, like they'd always existed.
That's some Hegelian shit right there.
>>7394342
Maybe if we start joking about reading books, eventually someone will read those books?
Wait...
>>7394342
It's likely they were here all along just part of the 90 percent of non contributors. When a favorable set of memes comes about it makes it easier they can more easily jump into the 1/9% of content makers/contributors.
When people say 4chan is x they are only judging it on a 10th of the database.
>>7394371
Nein. There aren't enough absolute madmen for that around here.
I blame relativism, you know. Like now pretending to read books is at least more like reading books than not even pretending to read books.
No one wants to discuss Gravity's Rainbow? D'aww.
>>7394247
>these /lit/-/tv/ crossover memes
No wonder this board so pleb. They even have "what did he mean by this" threads on /tv/ now.
>>7395272
Fucking tv and movies just can't stop ruining Literature, can they ace? Unbe-lievable.
>>7394385
real shit man... the 1% rule is in eggect
>>7394385
Yeah, but those ninety percent keep coming back. Why?
A judgment on content of 4chan is more likely more than the 10%, but less than the ninety.
>Osbie on the nutmeg
>>7395284
can't tell if sarcasm or not
>>7394342
haha if you didn't covert from atheism/agnosticism to apostate Catholicism/Episcopalianism/Anglicanism around the mid 2000s
>>7395458
story on pic?
>>7395965
Probably some broke students moving to cheaper neighbourhood being attacked by people who think they have a monopoly on poverty
