Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 665. page
- Home
- Board: /lit/ - Literature
- Reading: Archived threads in /lit/ - Literature - 665. page
Do you guys have any recs for someone who just picked up reading as a hobby? I just finished Shadow of the Torturer, I didn't really get that engaged with it, I'm reading The Hobbit right now and it's pretty. I want something that's going to challenge me though.
>>7892523
Brin's Uplift Saga
>>7892525
Looks interesting, I'll check it out. Thanks
Foucault's Pendulum
Wittgenstein's Mistress
Heisenberg's Pandora
Tesla's Hammer
Kripke's Symbol
Delueze's Mirror
>"Talese, who is one of the originators of the New Journalism movement of the 1960s and 70s, was asked at a conference on 2 April to name any female writers who inspired him. “I didn’t know any women writers that I loved,” he was reported to have said, sparking criticism from women in the audience."
>“Gay Talese couldn’t think of a single woman writer who inspires him or whose work he loves. That unfortunate man. Maybe he needs to read more widely. For a start.”
http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/06/authors-respond-to-gay-talese-neil-gaiman-jodi-picoult
Do you think it's misogynistic if an 84-year-old white male writer can't name a single female writer he "loves"?
No. There is a very small number of great female writers. Neil Gaiman, Jodi Picoult and Tina Fey shouldn't be listened to, by the way.
And please don't come back to this board. Your thread is quite useless and the results will most certainly be unfruitful.
no. there are many great woman authors. but who cares if some old man doesnt "love" them. love means different things to sifferent people. also, he may have enjoyed some but they probably didnt "inspire" him.
yawn
Is there any other place like the London Review of Books where I can read actually interesting articles?
Read essays by the likes of TS Eliot, Ezra Pound and George Steiner instead.
>>7892459
Why are you interested in articles written by so-called ''professors'' and others who don't know anything at all of the subject they're talking about?
There's the New York Review of Books, but it seems to me to be full of worthless drivel.
If you want stuff about recent events you should either read Wikipedia or The Spectator.
60 years ago, C. Wright Mills published The Power Elite. In it, Mills talks of the powerless citizen, and how they are manipulated by elitist social powers – the corporate rich; Hollywood celebrities; the military powers that be; and politicians that use the mass-media to sway and dictate public perception. Furthermore, citizens will essentially try to assimilate to elitist ideologies and mannerisms, being shaped by the society in which they are surrounded, in order to attain status and a sense of social acceptance.
Thoughts on C. Wright Mills?
consideration of the book has become moderately more favorable over time. In 2006 G. William Domhoff wrote "Mills looks even better than he did 50 years ago."[5] Mills' biographer, John Summers, while admitting that The Power Elite was "vulnerable to the charge of conspiracy-mongering" declared that its historical value "seems assured."
Can the OP or any Anons recommend a modern equivalent to mr c wright mills. ?
>>7892471
who is it ?
an identifying name would be nice anon.
Has any one read pic related?
It's absolutely mind opening.
Also, general thread for all books and literrary content revolving around sodomy, wether between consensual adults or weak children and perverted old men.
>>7892373
>children cannot consent
nice personal opinion turned into a meme
>>7892382
please don't start to talk about politics and focus on books.
Have you read the book in the OP?
>>7892373
>It's absolutely mind opening.
:)
Does /lit/ ever read any practical books?
>>7892361
More like how to be an asskisser.
I've read it, it's okay if you're too autistic to understand social cues or just a sociopath wanting to improve their manipulation skills.
I've also read How to Read a Book: The Classic Guide to Intelligent Reading. I cannot justify reading it completely, just read the summary at the end of the chapters, you won't miss anything important. It's good if you come from a poor educational background where reading wasn't encouraged, it feels redundant otherwise because you pick up all of the strategies mentioned along the way.
No, the issue is that they are mostly subjective ramblings of an individual that wants to make money. I do not wish to change anything about myself, but I'm open to change when it comes. I.e., I would like it to be on my own discovery, with my memories and connotations so I can back it up instead of referring to a book.
>>7892361
pic related is a capitalism-centric guide to functional sociopathy
his other book "how to stop worrying and be happy" is a guide to resilient narcissism.
great job, dale.
PS did you know that he only adopted the last name 'Carnegie' because of the then-recent popularity of the guy who built Carnegie Hall?
>tfw reading the one star reviews of Heart of Darkness on goodreads
is there any hope, /lit/?
>goodreads
>any good
>anyone there reads
why don't you do something worthwhile?
All you're doing is reinforcing a shite outlook. "Look at all these IDIOTS. God I'm so much smarter than these absolute plebs. Guys look at these idiots haha aren't we so much smarter?"
/lit/, I witnessed a fairly interesting conversation yesterday on /a/.
The basis for that argument was whether or not removing the possibility of death makes the stakes drop out of the bottom of a work of fiction.
What do you think about the removal of death as a consequence in a work of fiction, /lit/?
>>7892296
peril/risk are only prerequisites for shitty plot-driven genre fiction (LOTR, chinese cartoons etc.)
>>7892304
/thread
>consider yourself /lit/
The guy was wrong because Log Horizon was never about life or death tension, it was about exploring the ideas of an MMO merging with reality. Not to mention they do lose out on memories when dying which makes death keep an element of tension.
How many books do you go through a week?
How do I stop sub vocalizing/read faster?
>>7892264
Why do you want to read faster?
>>7892264
Subvocalisation and speedreading are memes; read for comprehension and depth, not your goodreads bookshelf e-penis.
Read at your own pace you fucking autist it's not a race
>Death of the Author
>death of OP's thread
>>7892326
:^(
>>7892257
>Decline of the West
What do people here think of traditionalism and perennial philosophy? Not just Julius Evola but Eliade and James and Jung and Watts and Huxley and all the associated figures from right to left. If there is wisdom to be found in philosophy is it not transhistorical? And does it not spring up in East as well as West? This is my favorite area of study but neither /his/ nor /x/ reads books so I come to you. Feel free to ask me anything. I'm groping enlightenment in my bedroom as we speak :^)
>tfw NEET
>tfw living in low-income housing
>tfw spending all day burning incense and cannabis and meditating and reading books and practicing hermetic alchemy
>>7892193
>tfw NEET
>tfw living in low-income housing
This is exactly how I imagined "T R A D I T I O N / M Y S T I C I S M" readers would be.
>>7892193
I meditate watching soap operas.
>>7892193
>practicing hermetic alchemy
What will your life had meant at the end? Surely there is something better to do.
Favourite living writers who are under the age of 65?
I like David Mitchell, myself.
David Mitchell is my favorite author. Every one of his books was truly a great read EXCEPT Slade House, could not relate to coming of age british people in the 80s
>>7892579
Great opinion mate.
no, you like cock
What are /lit/'s thoughts on Tolkien's works? Pros and cons, best and worst, whether he was a good author or trash-tier?
hobbitts r fucken gay
>>7892164
u fookin wot m8
ill fookin hook u in th gabbah
>>7892154
The first swig from the patrician cup will tell you that he's trash, but at the bottom you will once again find that he is a great author.
>>7892137
Yes, but in a very different way. It's not hugely descriptive (being a kids book), but unlike the film it's super tight in plotting.
>>7892137
>Is the book as good as the movie?
But it isn't a good movie.
>>7892204
I'm sorry you had such a horrible childhood.
Anyone familiar with Qualia and the Knowledge argument and want to argue about it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_argument
wow what an insanely dumb argument
is this why certain philosophy really filters up into mainstream awareness, because the rest of it is ridiculous language games
>>7892026
Nice rebuttal, moron.
>>7892049
he's right, although it's not necessarily feigl's fault. it's just a really stupid method of reducing things to an aspect and then bringing in what was lost in the process in the form of a paradoxon. the irony of this method is that it relies heavily on a form of reductionism that it criticizes and assumes it works just like that in science or a person experiencing something.
