Canada is fixing a law that currently, technically allows for sexual relations between animals and people.
But on this topic, should beastiality be legal?
The big issue is people claim animals cannot consent, which is actually pretty ignorant.
Animals are more likely to try to have sex with people, just think back to the classic Dog humps leg.
The animals in initiating the sexual act and it's up to the person to consent or not, technically both parties are turned on so if you let the dog finish and nut on you cause your into to that it's technically okay. You both consent, no one gets hurt, you can't help what turns you on.
So then i ask, why shouldn't sex with animals be legal.
>>6356299
Idc. I just find it savage and disgusting.
But if you legalize that then pedophilia should also be legal.
Sure legalise it, doesn't bother me even slightly.
Sex with non-consenting animals can really mess them up. I imagine them becoming scared and skittish around people if their owner abused them, forcibly held them down, and stuck their dick in it.
I know people are going to say "animals can't consent at all," but there are plenty of examples of dolphins that actively presented their dolphin puss to humans and dogs that mount human girls who bent over for them without grooming them into it. Those are just the few examples I know, honestly don't have any experience about being around animals in heat.
>>6356299
Animals banging each other is the equivalent of kids exploring with other kids. Animals coming on to people is the equivalent of a child coming onto an adult. The adult should not let sexual activity continue even if the kid initiated it; I see it as the same with beastiality.
>>6356434
By why shouldn't they?
Is it cause god told them it's wrong?
Both parties are into it, no one gets hurt, adults can't exactly help what turns them on, so whats the issue?
It's an issue of morals, the same morals that say sex between two men is wrong. etc
>>6356491
Because sex between an animal and a human is more likely to create a power dynamic of possible abuse. If you just "let" an animal go through with it, then I suppose it's fine, but consent of an animal with a human is very hard to prove in court and even to the human that's interested. So, the human shouldn't make any "moves" on the animal.
this isn't /lgbt/ go to /pol/
>>6356299
The whole "animals can't consent" is pretty retarded anyway since in literally all other cases consent only applies to humans only so there's no reason to say consent somehow applies to this very specific case and not all others.
What is however a legit complaint is the risk of injury of both human and animal, the fact that animals can react in unexpected and possibly dangerous ways and there's always the potential risk of diseases spreading.
>>6356502
But what if your a girl or a bottom and you like getting fucked by dogs? You're just taking it.
>>6356299
>people claim animals cannot consent, which is actually pretty ignorant
You're baiting us or you're an idiot. They're animals, they're not responsible for when they hump legs and shit. A human is responsible for taking advantage of an animal because humans are SAPIENT.
>>6356907
Grooming a dog to want to fuck people is bad behavior to instill. You make the dog weird and people will be suspicious of how you're training your dog if it tries to mount every guest you have over. Then. if for whatever reason you have to put the dog up for adoption, nobody is going to want to adopt a dog that tries to hump their children.
>>6356506
this
it's so easy to spot them
>>6356506
Trannies have like 6 different gens here.
It's only fair that zoophiles get one too.
>>6356299
>The animals in initiating the sexual act and it's up to the person to consent or not, technically both parties are turned on so if you let the dog finish and nut on you cause your into to that it's technically okay. You both consent, no one gets hurt, you can't help what turns you on.
but what if the dog is underage?
>>6357012
lgbt = lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender
beastiality is not included, that's like arguing pedophiles should be able to use this board. plus it's not a gen but a question about laws (fucking /pol/). this is all ignoring the fact that's a fucking cancerous troll post in the first place
>>6357047
Well, transgender doesn't have shit to do with sexual preference either, yet it is included with gay, bisexual and lesbian.
People fucking animals is closer to the LGB part than T will ever be.
>>6357077
what animal? dogs? goats? chickens? fuck off you sick fuck, and fuck the trannies too
>>6357104
>and fuck the trannies too
Rule 1: Don't stick your dick in crazy.
BOOO FUCKING BOOO.
we kill animals.
we eat animals.
we remove animals from their natural and social enviroment, making them grow in artificial places and within a surrogate community.
we enslaved animal races to grow them in farms, while selectively and forcefully breeding them.
that's for our survival.
We chain down dogs, force them to live without any of their kind to socialize with, leaving them alone and depressed for years enclosed within 4 walls.
Purely for our entertainment.
After accepting we do all of that you are allowed to care about an animal being violently raped only if you are vegan.Why would you care about animal sufference? why would you care about animal consent?
And of course putting human penis into a dog doesn't necessarily involve violence and animal can still consent.
i can only respect you wanting anti-bestiality laws only if you are vegan ( in that case go kill yourself),sincerely think that state and law should dictate and enforce culture, and even in that case dictating the sexual practices of a man alone in his barn is fucking silly; it would be pathetic that states don't enforce cultural norms in much more promising areas.
I heard on /d/ that dog vagina feels so amazing that you'll never even look at a human female again.
If that's true, it's probably for the best that it's banned.
>>6357640
This
Only reason people don't like bestIality is because "EW ITS NASTYYY"
If you have no problem torturing animals for the sake of maximizing profit but have a problem with a dog freely penetrating an asshole then you need to reevaluate your life. Also this "but you wouldn't let a kid fuck an adult" is retarded because no kid would want to do that in the first place without someone coaxing them to.
>>6357664
what about dog butt
WOW, lgbt being zoophobic, yes you are very tolerant, but only with your kind...
>>6359084
>no kid would want to do that in the first place without someone coaxing them to.
Well somebody should have told that to me when I was 8 because I was the type of kid who daydreamed about being kidnapped by a child molester.
I almost was a few times in fact.
>>6359202
>I dreamed of being raped
Sorry you were abused, anon. No healthy child has those fantasies.
>>6359235
I was under the impression it wouldn't be rape if I started it, since child molesters were obviously only mean and bad because the kids didn't want it, according to my reasoning at least. Children aren't exactly clever you know.
>>6356321
those are two different things
one has hair only on genitals
and the other has hair all over.
>>6357640
>>6359084
I concur. First of all, I'm not convinced that beastiality is always animal abuse. If an animal is the one on "top", as in, the one doing the penetrating, it seems logical to assume that it "consents" to the act, whatever that would mean for a being without consciousness.
Even if the animal is the one being penetrated, it's not necessarily abuse, although that is more dangerous territory.
Nevertheless, we as a species have already asserted our dominance over animals and treat them as inferior. Most people eat animals, you kill mosquitos and mice and termites that invade your home, you'd euthanize your dog if it constantly bit you, etc. So as these other anons pointed out, to do all of these things and then act like fucking animals is savage is just being a hypocritical joke.
And to be perfectly honest, people do a lot of fucking savage shit in this world... letting your dog fuck your pussy or fucking your sheep wouldn't even begin to become anywhere close to the most fucked up, horrific shit that humans do, not even in the same ballpark. There are much bigger problems.
>>6359438
When it comes to dogs it is still a form of abuse even when the dog is on top. If the dog is not pushed off he will now associate humans with things he is capable of dominating and such a dog is a liability. It means it can potentially lash out at people randomly and if you are the owner and allow the dog to top you, you can forget about it ever being under your command again the dog will feel above you in the hierarchy. And that is a dangerous mentality for a dog to have.
>>6359487
I seriously doubt this. It is well documented that there are plenty of people out there who routinely fuck and get fucked by not only their dogs, but also horses. There are documentaries on the subject, as well as porn.
I say you're full of shit.
>>6359487
Owners let their dogs think they're the dominate ones all the time, that's why they misbehave a lot of the times. You're really grasping at straws saying a dog thinking they're dominate is a danger to people when they think that all the time.
>>6359517
Have you ever had a puppy? They start humping things at a certain point. When they grow more they will start to try and establish dominance over their owner or the family they are in. Usually by humping someone's foot. If you allow them that person is now lower in the hierarchy.
Dogs use humping as dominance both bitches and male dogs will hump.
Even a bitch that has been allowed to hump humans will grow more aggressive and lash out at other dogs and children.
Horses and dogs can not be compared in this manner.
>>6359536
And that's why most people should not have dogs. Even in small dogs too much of the wolf brain is still there.
If the dog is not at the bottom of the pack it is always a potential danger to its surroundings. Why add the ultimate surrender in terms of sex into the mix? Dogs do not understand sex in the same capacity we do. Once dominated the capacity to go back is very difficult
>>6359558
okay there, mr internet dog whisperer. No one here believes you're some kind of dog expert. I certainly don't. You're just another faggot on the internet who's up to his eyeballs in his own shit.
>>6359561
I hope you are never allowed near any dogs.
>>6359561
>>6359567
why would I care what you hope? The only thing we know about each other is what we've typed here tonight. All I know about you is you're some kind of self-important faggot who thinks he is "one with the dogs". To be honest, it sounds like you really should take your dog's dick up your ass. It's quite evident that this is the subject of your dreams.
>>6359626
>is a responsible pet owner who actually knows shit about the animal they care for
>this is a bad thing
You just forfeited your rights to be upset when any of your future pets misbehave
>>6359665
wrong, dickless faggot. I responded to a little autistic cunt that pretended to know something.
Anyone can make up bullshit on the internet. You're completely retarded if you buy it.
>There are many cases where dogs attempt to mount humans. Given that mounting behavior is most typically a statement of dominance, it should now be clear that a dog which has grabbed your knee and is merrily thrusting away, is not saying "I love you," nor is it simply trying to be "amorous." When dogs mount human beings it is virtually always an attempt to express their feelings that they are dominant. In effect, they want to be leader of the pack. This kind of "talk" from a dog is not permissible. It should be stopped to maintain the pack hierarchy which should always put humans above canines in dominance.
>This kind of "talk" from a dog is not permissible. It should be stopped to maintain the pack hierarchy which should always put humans above canines in dominance.
>hould always put humans above canines in dominance.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/canine-corner/201107/why-does-my-neutered-dog-mount-other-dogs
boom! for real!
Why the actual fuck is this not on /an/?
This whole damn thread is in the wrong place.
>>6359752
>neutered
>humping
That article is not talking about sex you idiot. Mounting =/= sex. Humping in a dog is about dominance, sex is about procreation.
>>6359824
Dogs will never hump humans for procreation only for dominance.
>>6356299
I think the people who fuck animal don't seem to care about its well-being a lot o the times. It's not really a consent issue in my opinion since most animals could kick you over or bite your ass if they didn't like something
>>6359840
Yep, just said that.
>>6356419
>I imagine
Nice facts there bro, you should submit your thesis to science and collect your nobel prize.
>>6356299
If you can eat a cow you can fuck a cow.
>>6360152
If you can fuck a human you can eat a human?
>>6357012
There's 3 but I guess everything gets blown out of proportion when it upsets your sensitive feels.
>>6357012
Go over to trash or 8ch /zoo/ and make a gen there. There, fixed your problem.
>>6360160
Of course not. Eating is worse than fucking.
