>>5862284
it's a movie. I liked it. I also like that it pissed off the original author and tumbler users.

I watched all beastly three hours in a movie theatre and then immediately went into a bathroom stall and blew my load in under ninety seconds.

>>5862367

Yeah why did it do that exactly?

>>5862371
"objectification of women"
"too pornographic"
"pussy labia are too short and therefore body-shame women with long labia."

i dont think most of them are lesbians though. probably "queer" or some made up orientation. most lesbians i know like the movie.

Is this show really good?
I just read the plot in Wikipedia and cringed hard at the thought that the girls broke up all because the other girl felt lonely and cheated for a man.
The way the ending was written also left a bad taste on my mouth

>>5862404
>"pussy labia are too short and therefore body-shame women with long labia."

What the fuck. Feminism really is just a fucking fig leaf for narcissists.

Jewish propaganda to teach cultural marxism to the youth

was ok
I prefer the graphic novel tho just cause it has a less cliffhangeresque ending

Well, it's absolutely nothing like the original work apart from the main characters' names, and it's nothing like erotica directed by someone who knows her shit.

>>5862466

>>5862822
I haven't seen the film, but the comic is absolute tripe. I'm genuinely dumbfounded that anyone liked it. Has to be that thirst for representation.

>>5862284
shit compared to any decent japanese yaoi flick

>>5863483
>the comic is absolute tripe
I see it as a simple story for teenagers, and as such it's not bad, especially compared to what's published in France (unless I missed hidden gems). At least it has a clear, albeit simplistic, narrative structure, which the movie doesn't have.