What are you?
Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
If so, when?
Male, straight
Still opposed to it, I dont have a problem with G or L though
I'm think those 3 should never be acceptable
I think its only a matter of time
20 years until its legalized
>>5272462
>Opposed to trans people
>Should pedophilia be accepted
>Equating opposing trans people to opposing pedophilia
Get the fuck out op, 0/10 bait.
>What are you?
mtf, closet, asexual
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
my perception of transsexuals was mostly hons and drags before i started researching it. I wasn't opposed to it but more like "eww, they can do whatever they want with their body tho"
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
>pedophilia
there is literally nothing wrong with the fantasy itself
>paedophilia
what's the difference?
>sadism
Same, and if a consenting adult is okay with it then I'm okay with acting on it.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Yes.
If so, when?
I don't know.
>>5272481
The difference is that Britfags can't spell anything right.
>>5272480
Serious question. I want to know the views of lgbqt
>>5272462
I feel more sympathy towards pedos than I do trannies
I fantasize about murdering trannies because I hate them
>>5272481
Paedophilia is the actual act of having sex with a child
>>5272462
MtF, homosexual
Not really
Don't really care
Sadism is already pretty acceptable, but as long as there are parents pedophilia probably won't
Sadism if it isn't enough now in like a few years.
gay female
i used to be, now i feel bad for them.
i don't know the difference between pedophilia and paedophilia, but i think it's disgusting. sadism as a fetish is fine, as long as your partner consents to it.
i hope not, but it wouldn't surprise me very much.
>>5272462
>What are you?
gayfag
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
i really don't care what people do as long as they don't hurt anyone
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
what two consenting adults do between eachother does not concern me. child molesters are child abusers, but I wish pedos could seek psychological help if they dont want to hurt children.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
no because we will perfect loli/shota sex robots before we get that degenerate
I don't think I was ever opposed to it, it wasn't til 2008 I even knew what it's about and I'm gay myself. To be honest I still see it kind of weird and don't fully understand it but I'm not exactly against it. What I do think is that too many trans people are way too aggressive about it, because it really is something lot of people don't understand and when you attack them to make them tolerate you it just bites you back.
Child abuse is one of the things I hate the most in this world but my stance on pedophilia is that a person who just happens to be pedophile isn't bad as long as they don't act on their desires. Getting help on it might be difficult because "coming out" gives extremely heavy stigma.
Sadism is kind of difficult question. Sadism against person who doesn't consent it is just cruelty, I don't think it will ever be acceptable but people still practice it and some even tolerate it. Now some guy whipping another guy because they both get off to it, I really don't think that even needs to be "morally acceptable" because it's something that shouldn't be other people's business in the first place. Like does a pee fetish need to be morally acceptable? No, but you can still practice watersports if that's your thing.
I support transsexuals.
>>5272492
Is it? if there's "philia" then it describes a desire, not an act.
>>5272494
True I guess I never thought about sadism as with another person consenting.
What if the parents are ok with a man having sex with their child? Or if there is only one parent and he or she is attracted to the child?
>>5272492
Just call it child abuse.
>>5272492
no it isn't, they just difference spellings of the same word, like feces and faeces
>>5272490
No, you dont. Ignoring the fact that pedophiles have fuck nothing to do with lgbt because everyone figured out decades ago that their sexuality is marginalized because raping kids is not acceptable and has nothing in common with queer relationships between consenting adults FOR THE MOMENT. Nevermind the fact that sadists are already accepted as part of BDSM culture. That leaves just your question of "do you oppose trans people" which isn't so much a question as it is an excuse for people to vomit out their negative opinion of transgender people. This is another stupid fucking 'should the LGB drop the T' thread slightly repackaged to appear less obvious. You're a stupid cocksucker and your ruse is garbage.
>>5272511
Why do you think the parents are the ones to decide that? There are lot of parents for example in some parts of Middle East where parents give their daughters for older men to marry and I don't think anyone here think it's fine. Sexuality doesn't need to be part of childhood, and note that I'm talking about actual children here not 16-year-olds that Americans lump together with prepubescents.
>>5272462
MtF, Bi
Briefly, when I was trying really hard to pretend I wasn't trans.
Pedophilia's a fucking miserable condition to get stuck with, and I feel terrible for everyone that is. By contrast child molesters, pedophile or no, are scum. Sadists are fine if they keep their shit to fantasies and SM relationships, but are real assholes when they try to bring that to the real world. Hate them being in positions of power.
I think all of them will be morally acceptable in the future.
Sadism already is, transsexuals will get there in roughly 10 years, and pedophiles in roughly 30.
>>5272524
>FOR THE MOMENT
Mind my pronouns shitlord, I take offence to people who call me a cocksucker
>>5272551
Fuck off and die le meme man.
>>5272553
TRIGGERED
>>5272462
>What are you?
Transbian
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
No.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
Sadism is fine, provided there's consent. I'm opposed to pedophilia on the grounds that even a "look, but don't touch" policy winds up exploiting kids who are too young to understand what they're doing.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Probably not, at least not in western civilization.
>If so, when?
The day after the apocalypse.
>>5272462
bi mtf
i knew nothing about trannies before i was one
whatever, wrong, this third is ambiguously phrased
sadism is just deriving pleasure from harming people, not harming people, so i don't care about it
probably the first will at least be addressed. i fail to see how sadism is problematic amongst consenting adults as it stands. someone will probably come up with a way to rationalize paedophilia in the future but that's a bit far off.
>What are you?
Transbian
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
Obviously not. Even if I wasn't trans, I believe people have the right to do whatever they want with their own bodies.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
People really can't help what turns them on. Acting on pedo urges is child abuse and is unequivocally unacceptable. Viewing CP encourages child abuse and is also unacceptable. I don't care about 2D because no actual children are involved. No comment on "paedo" because I'm not a Britfag, cut it out with the extraneous vowels already.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Sadism is already there, isn't it? Maybe not with the Jesus people but they don't like anything. Pedophilia will never be morally acceptable in civilized cultures because children cannot legally give consent, and anyone arguing for changing this is seen as a monster and their voices swiftly silenced. Plus there's the whole cult of the child that posits children as our most precious resource that must be protected at all costs from violent video games and "cyberbullies" and what have you. That's only getting stronger, so there's no way in hell people are going to suddenly warm up to pedos unless there's some radical and massive social change like ISIS conquering the West (lol).
>>5272462
homo male
>opposed to people
no, but opposed to the current treatment that involves changing society to indulge them in their delusions instead of giving them anti psychotic drugs
they're wrong
if anything I can see them being accepted to an extent, where people recognize that they are fucked in the head and should be pitied and treated, not hated and ostracized, but molesting kids will never be accepted
>>5272705
>"Please take a moment to consider my white-hot opinions while I suck on this dude's AIDS-infested cock."
>>5272467
why the fuck are you here?
>>5272776
triggered much?
>>5272705
i took anti psychotics
it did nothing to mitigate my dysphoria
you are a moron
>>5272826
>wants to put all the trannies on anti-psychotics
>thinks someone else is the one being triggered
I'm afraid I've got some bad news, senpai.
>>5272807
There is a non-0 sum of straight cis males roleplaying as women in lesgen. It's kind of weird, but there they are.
And no, before someone meme-posts it, I am obviously not talking about trans lesbians.
Straight mtf
Nope, even when I was in the closet I never got why people got so upset about us.
I feel bad for innocent pedophiles and think they deserve our sympathy. Acting on those inclinations is deeply immoral though. Nothing wrong with some sadism and masochism as long as consent is involved
Hopefully raping children is never acceptable
>>5272847
now i understand
>>5272846
lol whatever makes you feel better
>>5272847
>cis men role-playing in lesgen
There are some concerning implications here
>What are you?
Straight male
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
I am now. It's funny, when I first heard of them, I used to defend them cause I thought they were just a downtrodden group of people. Now I think they're disgusting, narcissistic weirdos. They make fags look like saints by comparison.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism? Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future? If so, when?
It will all be legalized when liberals are too cu-cked to fight off the muslims that want these things to be legal.
>>5272705
>no, but opposed to the current treatment that involves changing society to indulge them in their delusions instead of giving them anti psychotic drugs
Interesting proposal, where'd you get your MD from?
>>5273076
>straight male
>posting on /lgbt/
>uses kek'd unironically
>>5273076
Post lewds in your nazi uniform desu.
>5273076
Just what I was thinking
>>5272705
>>5273085
>shut down any talk of alternatives because they threaten my perception of reality
new treatments are stifled by this kind of attitude
>>5273817
choke yourself silly on some more brain mints, crusty dog shit
>>5272462
>Male, Gay
>No problem with it. dated Ftm in the past
>Who knows? Looking back in the past what is moral today could be evil next time. however i wouldn't want some 30yo guy drooling over my brother so no I'm against it.
Sadisim? Oh consenting adults and all that.
>Do I look like an 8ball? probably never.
>>5272511
Yeah most parents just aren't and won't be.
Gender questioning, bi, born male
Yes
First two bad, sadism is okay as long as it's consensual
Prolly not
>What are you?
Cis gay male.
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
No, I don't care much at all for transsexuals. I don't oppose them, I'm just indifferent.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
If you are a person with the desire to have sex with toddlers/children, then so long as you don't act on your urges, you're okay in my book. If you actually sexually abuse a child, then you should receive a fair punishment.
I actually am a sadist, so of course I see nothing wrong with it (so long as your sub has given consent and you are careful/responsible).
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Pedophilia? Maybe one day people won't hate people for being pedophiles. There is a difference between a pedophile and a child molester. But, that doesn't seem like it's going to happen very soon. Sadism is already pretty accepted, from what I've seen.
>>5272462
Female, homosexual.
No, although is it not called transgender? Is there a difference?
I hate pedophilia but don't mind pedophiles, as long as they are aware that they can never act on their desires.
Not sure, maybe. But I doubt it will be while I live.
Female (transgender female, take it for what it is)
Yes
Pedophilia is just a fetish I guess, it's harmful, but impossible to get rid of.
Sadism is obviously a bad thing.
Maybe pedophilia, as that's already a accepted thing in other countries, but not Sadism.
Probably in a few hundred years, or whenever globalism kicks in.
>>5272462
>What are you?
gay male
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
I shitpost and nag on trannies a lot but ultimately I'd never oppose someones right to do whatever they want with their body.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
Well pedo shit is definitely not really treated properly. I don't think it should be accepted but imprisoning people for it doesn't work. It should be researched more. Sadism I guess is fine if everyone consents.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
You mean the above 3 or trans? Transsexuals are already gaining a lot of momentum toward acceptance. Plus as we get better at treating it earlier there will be less ugly hons creeping people out.
The above things I don't think are really ever going to be fully accepted, but I think we'll get better at accepting they exist and dealing with them differently.
>all these pedo enablers
>>5274920
>imprisoning people for raping a child does not work
are you one of these people who thinks that being a criminal is like a treatable disease or something?
>>5275070
>>5275075
this desu.
what the fuck is wrong with you people treating fucking pedos like they're misunderstood or oppressed.
>>5272462
>What are you?
Male, bi
>Were you ever opposed to transexuals?
Not per set, It's their right, but biologically they are still their birth gender and literally nothing can change that.
>What are your views on pedophilia and sadism?
Pedophilia: Degeneracy, bullet to the head
Sadism: as long as the other person is okay with the pain, and consents to it, I suppose so. Still weird as fuck.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Hopefully not
>>5275075
It's not like you have to let them roam free if they rape a child, but when you toss them in prison it really doesn't accomplish much in stopping future pedo's. If we researched it more we might figure out ways of helping them before they commit the act. Like give them a sex doll or something lol
>>5275310
Holy shit, you're a pedo, aren't you?
If you rape a child, you go to jail. Period. End of fucking discussion.
Quit trying to weasel out of this and pretend that you're motivated by something other than the desire to destroy an innocent life for your own selfish pleasure. You are not "sick", you are an evil fuck who by all rights ought to be executed, rather than housed, but we live in a world of pedo-enabling fucktards like you so the best we can do is jail them.
>>5275310
Or, you know, kill them publicly and make a spectacle out of it.
That would be kinda effective for future pedos.
>>5272462
>What are you?
Hetero/aro asexual male, recently gender-questioning
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
No, first heard about them in middle school, but was pretty much indifferent until I started getting involved in online queer communities a few years ago
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
Not sure why you included pedophilia twice, I consider pedophilia a sexual orientation (inb4 someone says orientation can only be based on gender/sex), I don't think it's a choice, and I don't think it should be shamed if one sincerely understands that fucking children is wrong and they want to avoid doing it. Sadism is just a fetish, I'm pretty much indifferent to it as long as its consensual.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
>If so, when?
Maybe, but only to the extent that people realize that pedophilia isn't a choice and that not all pedophiles are child molestors. I don't think sex with children or actual child pornography will be legalized, but there may be greater acceptance of non-offending pedophiles and written/drawn pedo-erotic materials.
>>5272491
Parrot Hitler, is that you?
>>5272511
Children are people too, pedophilia shouldn't be acceptable because that's what's the parents want, because by that logic it's okay to kill children if the parents are okay with it.
>>5272705
Unfortunately, anti-psychotic drugs don't really work on actual trans people. But I don't think it's really necessary to change society in a major way, just let people live and identify as whatever gender they want.
>>5272847
Why do they do that though? I mean I could imagine pre-transition trans lesbians doing it as a way of experimenting with their gender, but why would actual men pretend to be lesbians?
Gay male
Only time I ever didn't like trans people was when I was a kid and didn't know I was gay and hated LGBT for no reason. I don't really see why adults would hate them so much.
I think being a pedophile is very unfortunate. I'm aware that pedophiles aren't always molesters/rapists and I feel very sad for the ones that hold it in their whole lives. It's just something that you can't do anything about. I don't think acting on the urges is acceptable, but I don't condemn them for simply being who they are.
If by sadism tou mean BDSM type stuff, I don't see whats wrong with it between consenting adults.
I don't think pedophilia will ever be legal, despite what /pol/ wants you to believe about the liberal boogeyman/degenerating society. The slippery slope isn't real. Just because society comes to its senses and stops condemning harmless things doesn't mean it's going to suddenly be okay with something that actually does harm people.
>>5275359
Nooo. That would (presuming that demonstrative punishment were effective) be effective against future child molesters. Pedophiles are going to keep happening, much to everyone's dismay.
>>5273817
If you really think you have an alternative treatment for gender dysphoria, why don't you do some research and see if you can find any supporting evidence? In science, ideas are not accepted unless there's some kind of strong support from them.
>>5275333
No I'm not a pedo. But we keep sociopaths and whatnot in psychiatric hospitals when they kill people, why not treat pedo's similarly so they can actually get mental assistance.
Then other psychiatrists treating the pedo's that haven't committed any acts would be better able to dissuade them.
>>5275459
>why not treat pedo's similarly
Because pedophile are not psychopaths. They are not insane. They are fully aware of their actions.
You're either a pedophile or wish you were one.
Closet gay male.
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
Don't know about "opposed". I just don't care for them. I don't know any and never will associate myself with one for obvious reasons. This is the case for 90% of the population. These people just isolate themselves into little circles because most normal people just want nothing to do with them.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
I'm not really sure what to make of paedos. They are similar to gays in that they only exist when they admit to existing. As far as everyone that knows me knows, I'm straight. Paedos should remain in that shroud of mystery.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Trannies will be tolerated as in people will call them "her" or whatever but they'll never be truly accepted as normal members of society for very obvious reasons. Paedos will never, ever be accepted.
>>5275502
>or wish you were one.
I'd love to understand where this statement comes from.
Why would anyone wish to be sexually attracted to children, that is not? I can't find the origin point.
Lesbian female
I don't think so, I had no idea what they were. I saw Chaz Bono on Oprah once and was confused. I saw another episode (my mom watched a lot of Oprah) about a FtM having a child too. Still confused.
Now I get it.
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
What is the difference betwen Pedophilia and paedophilia? Sadism.. is a kink I guess. Outside of sex I wouldn't recommend it.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
I don't think anyone would ever respect sadists. Pedophiles seem to be getting more accepted. I mean, they didn't choose what they like. As long as they don't act on it I don't care.
>What are you?
Male, gay
>Were you ever opposed to transsexuals?
I don't think so
>What are your views on paedophilia and sadism?
Assuming you talk about real pedophilia (pre sexual maturity) and not "pedophilia" (teens), I don't really support pedophilic sex. If you talk about teens, then my opinion is very same as my opinion on drugs, which is highly liberal. Sadism is ok if consensual play. If you're a pedophile, it doesn't matter which way you were born, it matters what you decide to do. The same goes for sadists.
>Do you think they'll be morally acceptable in the future?
Consensual sadism/masochism is kind of morally acceptable already, look at 50 shades of grey et cetera. I don't think pedophilic sex will be acceptable anywhere soon, as it hasn't been acceptable in the history either. Pedohysteria most likely will pass by and age of consent will be fixed globally on reasonable levels like 14-15 but that one has nothing to do with pedophilia.
>If so, when?
Pedohysteria will pass by before 2050 and age of consent reform world-wide set to the latter half of the century, first countries with low age of consents (below 14) increase them and then countries with high age of consents (more than 16) lower them.
Trans
No obviously
As long as no one's getting hurt that doesn't want to be hurt, go for it
Far in the future? Maybe, but not anytime soon
When we start holding people accountable for their own actions. It's too often forgotten that blacks/gays/tumblr/fetsihes/the patriarchy/feminism/whatever else have all been blamed for raping/grooming people into interracial marriage, homosexuality, and identifying as trans because no one understood why anyone would want to do those things unless they were forced to by someone or something else. Not that murder or child abuse are beneficial, but there's a ridiculously large gap between those actions and, say, taking someone off of life support and a consensual relationship between a 14 year old freshman and an 18 year old senior in high school, both of which, from a sadism-and-pedophilia-are-harmful-all-the-time perspective, are wrong.
But then again, 'Murrica is the country where a teenager commits first degree murder and is tried as a responsible adult, but if they date someone over the age of consent they're suddenly an irresponsible victim. It's also the same country you can die for at 18, but can't drink until you're 21. We're a country of contradictions and special pleading, so for better or for worse I don't expect much change in the near future.
That said, having sex with the mentally handicapped is probably going to be the next socially accepted "sexuality."
>>5275310
>If we researched it more we might figure out ways of helping them before they commit the act. Like give them a sex doll or something lol
Honestly, this is the biggest reason I think all the cracking down on 2D loli/shota that's been going on is a bad bad baaad idea. I mean it's certainly not a good thing for drawn depictions of child abuse to be readily available, but if you take the one means of release those people have away from them what do you really think they're going to do? Stop wanting to fuck children?
>>5281283
Any country, where the age of criminal responsibility is lower than the age of consent, is based on a retardation and cannot be taken seriously law-wise. The higher the gap the more retarded the country and the people living there are.
>>5281322
>the more retarded the country and the people living there are
Yeah, that's nothing new.
>>5272462
>What are your views on Pedophilia, paedophilia and sadism?
All of that is fine as long as you maintain consent however for the first two consent is not possible.
>>5272462
Ftm, bi
Not really
Pedophillia/paedophilia: Absolutely disgusting, horribly abusive, there's no way to be involved in it that doesn't imply the suffering of a minor (unless it's sexting with a 16 y/o who's 100% consensual of showing you their goods; that doesn't make it ok, just less awful) except just keeping it as a fantasy
Sadism: As long as it's consensual and not in public places it's ok, don't really have much of an opinion on it
Pedophillia is probably never gonna be accepted, or at least not in this generation's lifetime; if history shows us anything, it's that the age of consent has done nothing but increase. About sadism, I don't know if people have much of an opinion on it unless it's related to some person's murder or something, so it probably is and isn't gonna be accepted at the same time, just like now.
