prove me wrong
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
prove me wrong
>>30555294
F-4 wouldn't be X-wing because it just doesn't have the agility to dogfight. You do energy tricks and launch missiles from range. It's closer to the B-wing, X-wing is either F-14 or F-15.
>>30555503
X-Wing would be F-16 then faggit
the X wing was the P51 Mustang and the TIE fighter was the Mitsubishi Zero
>>30555503
F-14 would be X-Wing because s-foils=swing wing. A-Wing would be F-16.
>>30555294
P-40
P-47
P-51
OR
Hurricane
Typhoon
Spitfire
>>30555503
X-Wing would be F-35 because it's an overpowered bullshit plane that gets to do whatever the fuck it wants with PLOT power and can spank the shit out of craft that are lighter and more nimble than it. Plus both have parts that move around during flight to change its speed.
A-Wing would be the F-22 which is more nimble.
B-Wing would be the F-15E.
Y-Wing would be the B-1.
>>30555588
z-95 would be an F-5
Y-wing would be an f-15 strike eagle
x-wing is f-18 super hornet
K-wing is an a-10
b-wing is f-111
A-wing would be an f-14 or this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_American_XF-108_Rapier
>>30555294
The original X-wing and TIE fighters WERE slightly based off real aircraft, but they weren't jets. But WW2 props, the idea of X-wings having hyper dive (long range) and TIE fighters being small range fighters is based off the P-51 and BF-109, respectively, and also the technological and pilot comfort differences as well. Even laser (tracer)colors used are based off allied and axis preferred colored rounds
equating empire's airplanes w rebel's starships
>>30555294
z-95 is an f-16
x-wing is f-15
y-wing is the f-4
>>30555648
Jesus, does Lockheed even try to hide it anymore?
>>30555648
> it's an overpowered bullshit plane that gets to do whatever the fuck it wants with PLOT power and can spank the shit out of craft that are lighter and more nimble than it.
>>30555805
>allied and axis preferred colored rounds
Now that's cooky.
>>30555294
The Incom T-65 X-Wing has internal guns.
z95 is a direct predecessor to the x-wing, like the f101 and the f4
the f105 is a fighter bomber that had single and two seat versions and scored quite a few A2A kills
f105 and f101 are the same generation, f4 was a newer plane
I think it works
>fighters
>in space
What value would a fighter have in space? Seeing that they would be magnitudes slower than a larger capital ship and they have nothing to hide behind.
>Z-95 Headhunter
F4 Phantom
>Y-Wing
F/A-18
>T-65 X-Wing
F-22
Old fighter, fighter-bomber, and new fighter. Simple as that.
