sexy warplanes
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: sexy warplanes
this is a sexy warplanes thread preformance dont mean shit (so dont argue about it here) just looks
Invasion stripes
>>30525604
>the F-117 is probably older than the F-22's pilot
>>30525604
Why post a picture of the ground, this is a plane thread
>>30525708
there is no plane in this picture
>>30525708
does this picture of the moon suit your tastes better?
>>30525495
look at dem rivets
>it ain't me
F-8s are pretty sexy
seks?
>>30525460
>You will never fire an air to air nuclear missile.
>>30528335
>>30528785
Nothing gets me goin like variable incidence wings.
>>30528747
what in /k/'s name is that horrendous piece of shit???
>>30530005
who knows?
Fuck it I got some free time. Any requests?
>>30530559
Weird shit
>>30530609
>Take the time to organize my pics
>Forces me to sift through fuck knows how many.
...Shit man. I'll need a minute.
>>30526979
knock-off garbage
Hustler
>>30530652
any reports on the effects of them? wasnt the f4 already reaching the limits of its structure without them while maneuvering?
>>30530559
F-111 plez
>>30530686
I think this was just to test out fly-by-wire systems. I honestly know next to nothing about why it had canards.
>>30530688
Moving on, let's see what I got.
>>30526070
>tfw you manage to steal one of these from the Russian mafia in Mercenaries: Playground of Destruction
>>30530734
>>30530743
>>30530761
beautiful.
>>30530743
I'll stop here if anyone wants to see anything else in >>30530559
I'm an F-111 slut. Fave plane by far. And the medium fast attack/bomber in general.
>>30530782
gibe f117 nighthawk pls
>>30530818
>>30530782
^ if not that, F-18. Hnng I love the F-18.
>>30530818
Here we go.
no doubt
>>30530860
>>30530833
>>30530841
>>30530848
>>30530853
>>30530860
>>30530873
muh dick
thank you
Why are there so many jet fighters? It's not like we got to have so many different warplanes, what the fuck.
>>30531115
> It's not like we got to have so many different warplanes
Yes we do.
>>30525708
Obviously they have stealth mode turned off
>>30530870
lewd
>>30525670
A-20s are underappreciated
>>30530958
cum historia
mutat valde Razgriz
>>30533280
That game is why I have a fetish for japs and redheads
>>30528335
Wait- it's flying with the wingtips still folded? I didn't know it could do that.
>>30533981
>Don't talk to me or my WSO ever again
>>30534039
>>30534051
>>30525632
Oh look! An F-14! Wait! How did I get here in this thread?!?! I swear I'm not an American..... Fuck you caught me. Well done op.
>>30527012
Are those still operational?
And with what weaponry? Do they carry R77's?
>>30530633
Looks like the bastard child of a YAK-48 and an A-6; the Forgetruder?
This fucker makes my dick diamonds for some reason.
>>30534028
>>30534039
>>30534051
>>30534058
No one but cucked swedes find these abominations sexy
>>30534350
It's a 2002 modification, what do you mean by "still" operational? Of course they are and of course they do carry the whole range of armament.
>>30537795
>Do a roll
>Lose altitude this hard
"5th" gen.
>>30534350
Of course the are operational we just got them (disregard the fact that our star pilots have already crashed 2 out of 12). The day before yesterday (tue) they flew alongside our old as fuck f-16s for our independence day parade.
>>30538131
>Post asinine comment
> Fail to understand the phenomenon of lift
"(You)" posters.
>>30530559
Is it too much to ask you to uplod your pics to mega. Cause i want everything... (specialy your organization becase mi pics are not even in a single folder i have a 6gb mess of /a/ /k/ /g/ and /s/ pics
>>30539174
DCS hard now...
more???
>>30531864
Can anyone translate the sign?
P-51's m8
Post big bombers
>>30539102
>Shill for Fail-35
>Get BTFO
>>30539930
>>30539204
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2rR7lpxxlE
>>30525707
>You will never get to fly an F-5
>You will never even get to fly a T-38
>>30540623
>You will never even get to fly a T-38
I wouldn't feel too bad about that.
>>30540711
>Implying I want to live in a world where the F-20 wasn't exported en-masse.
Also, I note one of those was a birdstrike and the other pilot error.
Though I note a control surface failure and it reminds me of the Thunderbirds T-38 crash where the elevators of the lead plane stopped working and nobody broke formation so they all hit the ground.
The T-38/F-5 lineage is too cute not to fly.
>>30540776
And F-104 was just too hard to control, but it doesn't make it any less of a Widowmaker.
>The T-38/F-5 lineage is too cute not to fly.
Dream about F-18, it's basically just a glorified upscaled F-5.
>>30540904
>it doesn't make it any less of a Widowmaker.
I dunno, while I worry for de-railing the thread somewhat was it not fine in Spanish and maybe Italian service, with Widowmaking mostly being a German meme?
The F-18 is too big and bulky. It's a nice plane, of course, but it's not quite so cute. Plus the F-5 (including the 2 seater F-5B) doesn't have a reputation for widowmaking at all.
Have an EE Lightning
>>30539239
I don't speak any language but English, but I think I've managed to bash it together. The first part of the speech was transcribed elsewhere to "...to further develop" and I managed to put the rest together myself.
"The Yugoslav People's Army has grown from the people in the national liberation war and revolution. At all stages of the construction of our socialist community, she has been a reliable mainstay of working people and their efforts to preserve the achievements of the Revolution and to further develop and it is still a powerful factor of national defence and an integral part of the armed people"
Tito on [at the] IX congress of the Socialist party of Yogoslavia
>>30542442
>Yogoslavia
Yugoslavia. That was a typing error on my part, not a translating one.
>Not posting the dr.1
What is wrong with you people?
>>30525447
MIG-16, hell of a bomber
>>30525699
Been inside that beast
>>30545127
>>30545138
You be of coming to the wrong neighbourhood, da?
>>30530349
That's not how canards work
What the fuck
>>30533843
I'm going to jump waaaaay out on a limb here and call this navy dickwaving at airforce high-drag-over-lift landings in 104s. They would practically kill themselves one upping each other
>>30530583
larger one
>>30542442
Thanks!
>>30545138
i didn't know the challenger was a plane? who knew
9.5/10
>>30525447
F-4 is the sexiest flying machines in existence. It's also the dumbest and most impractical. And I bet the designer(s) couldn't care less about anything and only wanted to create an art piece.
I mean, just look at that abomination. It's got upswept wings, and downswept horisontal stabiliser, just so that however the plane is turned, it's always something stickin up and sticking down at the same time. It's got two massive engines, so it looks better. Obviously it was designed without any plans for a cannon, you wouldn't want to have anything sticking out of that perfect nose of his.
It's called F-4 Phantom II. There is no F-4 Phantom I, there never was any F-4 Phantom, and there was obviously no need for Roman numeral ether, but it definitely looks better on the paper!
>>30550202
>They wanted to call it F-4 Satan but weren't allowed
https://youtu.be/335GdTqtyLs?t=1m20s
'Cause we're single-sea, multi-role. We can fly right up our own assholes!
>>30530864
i mean thats alot of firepower
>>30551024
Beautiful. Where is this picture from?
>>30539158
>wasting all that fuel just sitting there in afterburner
>on an already short-range fighter
Slav engineers in charge of carriers.
>>30551809
Would RATO be too expensive to use on every takeoff?
It would seem to be a useful way to get more out of a carrier without a catapult, unless it's far more expensive than I imagine.
>>30551836
I imagine with large-scale production they'd be cost-effective. You're sure as hell not going to use enough of them to match the cost of a steam catapult.
I doubt India is going to match the number of combat deployments as a US carrier would, or even the Chinese one for that matter.
>>30530559
>no A-10 folder
CF-100s, one of my favourite planes.
>>30553029
Shid I forgot the pic
>>30536724
you are astoundingly incorrect, my good fellow.
>>30528747
That looks like something out of Home World.
I wish countries were still zealous about building their aircraft domestically.
>>30554427
anyone have a good 190D shot?
