Light Vehicles
- Home
- Board: /k/ - Weapons
- Reading: Light Vehicles
Post LMV's
>>30455033
the finest in gypsy technology
![komatsu_lav_by_ddmurasame-d6c72un[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Ipc30mB.jpg "komatsu lav by ddmurasame-d6c72un[1]")
JDSF Komatsu LAV.
Amazing that the Japanese were able to develop and field a replacement for their unarmored HMMWV like truck, in 2002.
While the US military has still to field an armored replacement for the HMMWV.
>>30457424
It's like someone beefed up a RZR and mounted a twin javelin on top.
>>30457425
>only 4500kg
>only known resistance is to 55.6 and 7.62x39
Hardly worth the effort. Good looking though
>>30457465
At least Japan realized they had a problem and fixed it.
Meanwhile I had to suffer for years of sandbox deployements with no armor, up armor kits, and M1114s.
War Pig
>>30457497
>had to
you volunteered.
The more of these threads I see the more I'm convinced that this is a good idea (with some minor design changes)
>>30457450
good call, anon.
>>30457425
>what is the JLTV
>>30457973
Way too late to the party
>>30457371
that would make my daily commute more interesting.
>>30457863
Fuck I love this thing, zipping around blasting people with 25mm cannon fire sounds super fun.
>>30457863
Those two-part doors that open up and down are so fucking cool.
I would totally buy a Crab without a turret as an everyday car.
>>30458042
The Fennec is honestly fun looking, but it weighs 10 tons and only has a little more power than a BRDM-2, which weighed 3.5 tons lighter, and cost a third as much.
>>30457973
>what is the JLTV
A waste of tax payer money, as it's utterly useless as a cargo vehicle, meaning Hummers are still needed.
"But... but muh mine resistance!"
Except we already have ass loads of MRAPS, that are far better suited for the job and are already paid for, but we're giving them away for free or just parking them in the desert...
>>30457924
>minor design changes
Like its ability to flip 10 times after turning?
>>30463756
Imagine how rad it would be though
>>30455033
Sort of makes sense. Though they aren't bad cars for what's effective a £10,000 4x4.
>>30460606
I'd agree but only if they removed the armour for the daily driver variant. Could be a cool idea since it'd still be a decent ATV as well.
>>30455033
the look of the guy in the passenger seat says everything
Unimog Mothership
>>30457450
>First world technicals
Threw up.
