[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Which Lee-Enfield is the best?


Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 6

File: 1904 SMLE.jpg (119KB, 1600x1239px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1904 SMLE.jpg
119KB, 1600x1239px
Which Lee-Enfield is best, /k/?
http://www.strawpoll.me/10630307
>>
Also, general Enfield rifle thread.
>>
File: 20160617_135332.jpg (2MB, 1920x941px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
20160617_135332.jpg
2MB, 1920x941px
Probably the No4 Mk1 because of the much improved sights but I can't turn down the appeal of the No1 Mk3 and it's ugly nosecap
>>
File: No4mk1_5-26_A.jpg (878KB, 1280x639px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
No4mk1_5-26_A.jpg
878KB, 1280x639px
Rifle Number Four.
>>
File: SMLE, No. 4, No. 5.jpg (928KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
SMLE, No. 4, No. 5.jpg
928KB, 1920x1440px
>>
Technically speaking the absolute best Lee Enfield ever made would be a No4 Mk2 from the mid 50s converted by an gunsmith who knew Enfields (probably a UK or Commonwealth one, since it was common to soup up and convert Enfields and they made an art out of it) to 7.62x51.

What that would give you is:
- The last and best Enfield design
- The highest quality of manufacture and fit/finish ever seen in No4 rifles (tied with post war Long Branch)
- Eliminates the obsolete .303

Other contenders are the Envoy, Enforcer, and L42A1 rifles, which only take a second place due to the fact they were not exclusively manufactured on post war Faz Mk2 actions. In the case of the L42 is was made with the best wartime No4T actions but they are still inferior to a '55 PF rifle.

The typically higher quality of No1 rifles from the UK and Aus versus the on average lower quality of wartime No4 rifles does not, in my book, mitigate their inferior design.

pic related, Faz '55
>>
>>30454783
>*'55 UF
>>
>No option for the No1 Mk5

It looked like a No1 Mk3 but had a No4 style rear sight system.

The best of both worlds.
>>
>>30454456
Someone saved my shitty picture from forever ago. How nice.
>>
What's the average price for a No 4 Mk 1?
>>
>>30455604
like $350
>>
File: 1467196548455.jpg (198KB, 3488x2016px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1467196548455.jpg
198KB, 3488x2016px
>>30455604
i just got one for $300 recently, but people as as much as 450, just depends on condition and where you live i guess. they were only $100-$200 a few years ago
Thread replies: 12
Thread images: 6
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK