Does having women in the military effect its performance?
Is it a positive or negative effect?
>>30437510
>They suck!
>Im a pog who humped a female dog on deployment
The thread
>>30437510
>Does having women in the military effect its performance?
Yes, very much so.
>Is it a positive or negative effect?
Net negative. Civilian culture needs to shift drastically to make it a positive effect.
>>30437510
ANTS
>>30437510
Being Infantry, I never encountered a female in the military until NCOPD. They were fucking useless and a huge pain in the ass. Talk about whining and complaining. Those two nigger broads would have benefitted our squad more if we shot them.
>>30437510
Yes it does
Negative, no question.
/endthread
>>30437510
>effect
>>30437654
How does the civ sector need to change? Be forewarned I'm already finding your conclusions absurd.
>>30437510
been in the puddle pirate yacht club for 2 years and 2 women from my basic company are either pregnant or gave birth already.
New girl at my unit just made e4 and still isn't qualified while trying to get pregnant with her husband and while on duty complains about being "baby crazy".
The female mechanic at my unit couldn't point out the air condenser on the Detroit diesel engine on our boat.
Just to name a few.
I've only met 3 women in the USCG that were good at their jobs and they were all officers.
>>30440064
that's why they were officers.
dear lord how many times are we going to have this thread
>>30437510
found it
>>30440064
>they were officers
And they didn't even have to earn their way, they just let them be officers with lower standards
Mixed gender Israeli squads have higher casualty rates than all male squads. I don't know much more than that.
Women do have a place in the military. That place just isn't the front lines.
>>30437597
>implying combat arms is full of stories of strong women carrying their weight
>>30437510
Well it makes it more likely that I'll actually stand at attention.
>>30437510
Yes. Very negative.
>>30437908
This. Effects affect.
>>30437908
That is the correct usage of 'effect'.
>>30441649
No it isn't.
http://grammarist.com/usage/affect-effect/
He means in the first line.
In the second line OP uses it correctly. But I'm assuming that's because he doesn't know the difference.
>>30441722
Oh, I was looking at the second line.
>>30437510
More women = more bodies. US women seem to make pretty worthless soldiers, though.
>>30441786
We don't need more bodies.
We have one of the largest standing armies in the world and we're 100% volunteer.
Barracks bunnies serve no purpose other than leeching off the system and making others' do their work while they bitch and falsely accuse the men of rape because they're whores.
>>30441807
>We don't need more bodies.
The US may not need more bodies, but there are other countries that do.
>>30441223
No they fucking don't. Most of the women get cushy desk jobs once intended for the NCOs too fucked up to do anything physical anymore.
>>30442041
True. Like Israel. Where women are conscripted.
Not everyone is in the infantry. Work in Signal Service or Intelligence have less emphasis on physical strength.
