[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
F-35A’s 8:0 kill ratio against F-15E
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 3
File: 160621-F-EA289-0021.jpg (557 KB, 3184x2120) Image search: [Google]
160621-F-EA289-0021.jpg
557 KB, 3184x2120
A U.S. Air Force infographic on the F-35A’s deployment to Mountain Home Air Force Base revealed that the jet scored a 8:0 kill ratio against the F-15E during mock air combat.

The victories were clocked by combat-coded F-35As from Hill Air Force Base and were part of the evaluation process needed in order to declare the jet is initially operationally capable.

The seven jets and their pilots must also demonstrate they are able to carry out basic close air support and limited SEAD/DEAD missions.

For that, the crews were able to attain a 100 percent sortie generation rate with 88 of 88 planned sorties and a 94 percent hit rate with 15 of 16 GBU-12 bombs on target.
>>
>>30388463
They flew 88 sorties and dropped 16 bombs?
>>
File: 34565432.jpg (146 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]
34565432.jpg
146 KB, 960x960
>/k/ BTFO

B
T
F
O

F-35 MASTER AIRCRAFT CONFIRMED.
>>
>>30388470
>i can`t read

OCA
SEAD
AI
DCA
CAS

Not all of it requires bombing runs.
>>
>a plane that Forbes said was bad is actually good
WOW WHAT A FUCKING SURPRISE STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES.
>>
>>30388463
Are expectations so low beating a 28 year old plane is now cause for celebration?
>>
File: bbw dominatrix.jpg (1 MB, 5616x3744) Image search: [Google]
bbw dominatrix.jpg
1 MB, 5616x3744
>dog fights

Wait, so was it BVR or VWR?
Quite a difference.

Frankly, I doubt it could score 8:0 against F-15 in an actual close combat.

BVR? Without a doubt, F-35 will detect and track F-15 long before it will notice a faint signature of F-35.
>>
>>30388476
/k/* has always been with the F-35 after about 2012 or so, and people woke up.

>*chicoms and vatniks are not /k/.
>>
>>30388493
It`s airfame is inferior to that of F-15. It`s got better high AoA handling - that`s what pilots say when comparing to F-16 - but considering how good F-15 is, yeah!
>>
>>30388496

There is hardly a threshold between BVR and then WVR.

Its not like a line you cross and now you can win.

If a F-35 maneuver behind and level (or just below) an F-15, it can be 3 feet from it and the F-15 wont see it.

Being that the F-35 can watch it the entire time, and orient itself behind him, it can make even WVR shots without being seen. At 10-15 miles, well within the Aim-9 NEZ, the F-35 is a speck on the sky.

You cant jump a F-35 like that, with its total 360 degree awareness.
>>
>>30388517
>Aim-9 NEZ, the F-35 is a speck on the sky.

F-35 can carry AIM-9(X) only externally, rendering it`s low signature meaningless.
>>
>>30388534
>meaningless
Wouldn't say that, but it defiantly raises its RCS (we can't know how much). 4 AIM-120s are enough though, 6 will be even better when it gets that update.
>>
>>30388534
It will only increase its RCS by that of the aim-9x's RCS, which is not all that much.

You ignore the fact that the F-35 can completely avoid the frontal radar cone of the F-15, and ingress and attack from the front and sides. The F-15 wont see the F-35 at 100 km, even with Aim-9's on the wings, but the F-35 will sure as shit see the F-15.

If you want to get real pedantic, then Aim-120's or Aim-132's in the bay.
>>
>>30388482
SEAD, CAS and AI certainly do.

It is a STRIKE fighter after all.
>>
>>30388591
You don't know the makeup of the missions.

I mean, judging by the bombs alone it was mostly OCA and DCA.

I dont get your issue here.
>>
FTA, IOC certification for "two GBU-31s and two GBU-12s, or two AMRAAMs." So, likely BVR.
Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 3

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.