Just curious /k/, how many human bodies could a .223 round penetrate? I know that there are varying factors that would affect this so let's just say that the people are in a cramped space like a nightclub. We can assume that clothes are either not present at all or light and only a single layer. Body type is probably going to be /fit/.
>>30288521
I'm fairly certain it was .300BLK, not .223, just fyi.
>>30288521
I thought it was that 30cal meme round
Also, 300BLK in a full length barrel? god he must have been retarded
>>30288884
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/06/14/guns-used-kill-49-orlando-high-capacity-common-weapons/85887260/
Nope. 223.
>>30288906
Are you retarded? Go pull up some velocity figures once in a while
>>30288521
1, maybe 2
>>30288521
All depends if the projectile tumbles or fragments. Biggest factor I think.
>>30288521
2
Nice image btw
>>30288939
>It is a weapon of war that can kill large numbers of people in close quarters.
Why do they always say this? It doesnt mean anything. Every antigunner parrots some version of this line.
>>30291586
Because liberal media pounds it into their heads until it's all they know, anon.
>>30290221
Yeah you're basically right, like 2 torso's and probably minorly injure a 3rd person.
