Battle Rifle General
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons
/BRG/
Where the m14s at? edition
>>30177395
You should kill yourself for being a crossdressing faggot.
Near its natural habitat
Freedom
Everyone at nuggetfest agreed the psg1 psg90 are shit desu
People who don't own M14s shit on them for issues that only affected USGI production during the initial runs. We got butthurt and don't post much about them.
Also, not even cast trash M1As are poorfag priced yet.
>>30177402
very nice
>>30177395
Lol I know that isn't your tiger
>>30177395
>Where the m14s at?
left mine at home. I'll bring it next VA nuggetfest. other stuff and ammo too.
thanks for letting me shoot the SVD. that's one of those guns I never thought I'd get a chance to even see in person.
>>30177746
I never said it was
>>30177843
Wasnt mine it was flandres or the other guy
>>30178097
my bad
>>30178163
dont apologize. you didnt try to imply it was your svd
>Tfw I had a battle rifle but I couldn't justify shooting it
Maybe if I got a FAL, but still. Oh well, already sold my 308 ammo.
>>30178097
Brought mine. Glad I did, too. Charlene doesn't get out much.
>>30177395
gonna be buying a DSA "FAL" (intermediate poor fag so will be buying SA-58 voyager model and slowly upgrading parts where i can) here soon,
what brake/flash hider do i need to be able to use a bayonet like the one in your pic op?
I need a good hunting cartridge for my M1, it's hard to decide.
I love Federal and Hornady makes a great .30-06 load, but I was also considering something like Core-Lokt because of price and availability.
Any help?
>>30177395
>$3k SCAR
>Airshit red dot
>>30178230
>Full aero build
>Budget 1-6 optic
Not surprised you couldn't afford .308
>>30179841
Did you fix the gas on that thing?
>>30179072
Lol I didn't know you guys were k , thanks again for the targets!>>30179072
>>30180781
Always happy to share the wealth, /k/omrade
Same old same old.
>tfw really wanting to pick up a PTR91 and a Walther P1 and act out my West German Cold War fantasies
>>30181388
>>30181536
NIGGA
Get the sequel book, it's nearly as good as Fireforce. A whole lot of operatan with reserve forces in PATU with one really neat part where Chris is on horseback with some old Boers and there's a guy he operates with for a while who is still using a BREN to slot commies
I've been staring at this box for 3 months. Are Coonan receivers actually worth this wait?
>>30177395
Dropped my Geissele in
No money left for glass though
>>30177412
This looks familiar...
>>30178230
Bite the bullet, anon. I ate only ramen and coffee for 2 months to buy my FAL (was in high school working part time with liberal parents unsupportive of my hobbies) and a nice big box of surplus 7.62NATO. Poorfags can have dreams, too.
>>30179096
It's a Belgian short style flash hider.
>>30181615
Are Coonans supposed to be better than DSA or IMBEL receivers? I haven't heard much about them.
>>30177395
>Where the m14s at?
In the trash
>>30182385
I got a Type 3 so it was the cheapest option at the time, and according to Gunplumber lore barrels will always time correctly when hand tightening. Supposedly DSA receivers had some minor issues, but those could very well have all been resolved
>>30182385
Conan is modern cast. So its better than old school Imbel forged. Current crop of DSA forging would be better.
>>30182596
Can't hate on the Type 3, slab sides are fab sides. I'm sad I couldn't get in on the big IMBEL buy they did on FAL files recently.
>>30182677
If its not type 2, its trash
>>30182677
>glossy striped paint job
Almost as disgusting as anime fans and people who watch other people play dota-likes.
Just got this recently!
the G3 is the most accurate, reliable, well designed battle rifle ever made
Debate me: you will lose.
>>30182774
sorry you already lost by choosing G3
>>30182787
Not an argument
>>30182758
Why the gooseneck mount?
And a blast warden? Really?
The glass and bipod check out. Just need to upgrade those selectors, get a handguard extension, maybe swap CH side.
>>30179841
Can't beat Hornady's A-max bullets.
Assuming you're using the aftermarket gas plug, anyway.
>>30182774
Its not that accurate
Its probably reliable enough, most? meh
and its pretty poorly designed, one of the worst ergonomics on a battle rifle.
>tfw gun locker is depressingly empty these days
>>30182795
G3 at best 2MOA
reliability is less than M14
well designed not so much ergonomics are mediocre at best
you are backing and average rifle at best
>>30182869
Especially in a world where a SCAR is a thing.
natural_habitat.jpeg
>>30179072
yeah i saw that but you were off from the rest of the group so i was like ehh maybe locals
i was letting people shoot a couple of rounds for free out of scar, fal ,hk clone if they asked which i hope you did if you wanted to shot meme guns if not hopefully next time
>>30179096
this >>30182385
>>30179880
thanks people liked it
>>30181388
nice muzzle device
>>30181583
this i had to borrow it from the library couldnt find a cheap one online when i looked but once again im retarded so
>>30182232
post good pics of the REPR please its one of my favorite raifus
>>30182599
modern dsa cast isnt shit read fal files
>>30182719
neat
>>30182774
fite me irl
>>30182811
not everyone wants a heavy as fuck scar but hes nearly there
personally i just want my BHO piece so i dont have to tell people at the range that my 3k gun is slightly broken
>>30182859
organize your craftsman mechanic tool set senpai
>>30182811
I got a good deal on the mount and it works well. The outdoor range I go to is shooting from benches and the last time I went I blew out the fluorescent light above me. As far as the charging handle I just prefer it on the right when shooting from the bench.
What selectors do you recommend, the magpul ones seem well reviewed and a good price.
>>30182719
>>30182755
Let the hate flow through you.
>>30182903
Hey ya go.
>>30182903
Did you ever call FN customer service?
And you can get carbon handguards that are lighter weight than stock rails. If he was going with a lightweight SCAR, why would he use a scope that weighs 30oz with the sunshade he has on it?
>>30182915
I use the magpul ones, they are priced right and they work. The stock ones are fine, until you use an aftermarket one.
>>30182903
Its beyond hope of organizing, the case is fucked and I have not gotten around to getting a nicer tool box.
>>30182924
Its not hate, its disdain.
>>30182903
I saw the FAL, but didnt feel as tho my shorts were justifiably short to do so. Next time...I was letting people pop off with the m1A. Not too many takers on the 500.
>>30182924
>owning a reptile as a pet.
So your home stinks too. Great.
>>30182947
>>30182960
I don't really want an extension, I know the scope and bipod are heavy so a rail extension doesn't really make it worse but they are both on QD mounts. I plan on eventually getting a red dot for it as well and want to keep it light where I can. Plus I like the look of the PMM mlok stuff, and the sun shade I just left on because its hilariously xbox huge.
Will also check around for the magpul selector, pretty sure it is what I will go with.
>>30182924
>caliber printed on bullet
So what kind of eurofag posted this photo?
>>30182973
Either way, I've succeeded in rustling you across the vast gulf of the internet.
>>30183048
It's German Surplus sold on the civilian market, bought it on SGAmmo.
>>30183025
Skinker-dinker isn't a stinker, they only smell if you're a degenerate who refuses to keep their living space clean.
>>30183032
If your trying to go lightweight, a Handl handguard extension is lighter than stock rails.
http://fnforum.net/forums/scar-accessories-scopes-mods/65616-extended-handguards-fore-ends-rails.html
>>30182947
yes its on backorder it will be in my mailbox as soon as they get it and ship it
i was joking obv with that donkey dick he has on the end there
>>30182966
go to a couple of yard sales or flea markets and find old metal craftsman boxes for sub 20$ thats what i keep most of my gun tools and cleaners in
>>30183032
>hiding his serial numer
>manlet setting on the stock
also m1a guy toolbox
>>30183102
>rustling
Six year old may-mays supposed to get me bothered?
>>30183118
Good call, its estate sale season and now I have a new reason to find them all.
>>30183138
although you wish to seem unaffected your dutthurt shines through your post like a golden light of anal devastation.
>>30183138
You've replied several times, so I'd say so.
Show me your non-glossy BR, fampai. Let me bask in your superiority.
>>30177446
Jeez only 5 post in and you post your natural habitat
>>30183216
Gloss is the devils finish
>>30182677
>windows
>tv as monitor
>skinnyfat
get the fuck out of here
>>30183118
I might be small, but my dragon dildos are large. Also I didn't plan on it hiding the serial, it just worked out that way. What kind of ammo are you nerds using in your scars? I hear 168/175 grain works well.
>>30183251
That flashlight and mount are silly as fuck.
>>30183296
175gr stabilizes out of it pretty well. With 1:12 it shouldn't really, but it does. Belgian magic I guess
>>30183329
Thorntail is silly?
Surefires cheapest flashlight aint bad.
>>30183296
whatever surplus people sell me on the cheap if it doesnt blow up any other rifles first
DAE cook with their raifus?
>>30183251
That's a nice rifle. And you're right, that's why I use semi-gloss.
>>30183284
Nah, they're both monitors, just different brands. And you're not wrong about the skinny fat thing.
>>30183393
i hope your lizard fucking kills you piece of shit
>>30183393
Its all good man. I just dont dig on type 3 receivers.
thoughts on the MAS-49?
>>30183418
what kind of redneck buttsex has made you so hateful anon did daddy make you squeal like a pig, did your uncle tell you you had a pretty mouth and follow up on it.
>>30183525
i would fuck it
>>30183525
It's beautiful.
>>30183525
I kind of want one, mostly because I want a .308 rifle.
Are there any reliable scopes for the MAS-49?
Still in breaking it in. So far, runs best with TulAmmo .308. There's some delicious irony there, given that it's a mismash of PSA, Anderson, and other random cheapass pieces. I wonder if it's under/overgassed.
>>30183971
>all that oil leaking out
>>30183991
Kek, heard that one before. Prior to it's first range trip. Upper and lower came incredibly dry, so I soaked them a few times, and it drank it all in. Of course, some of that could be that I was using RemOil, which I recently learned is shit, which doesn't last long at all.
>>30183971
>non posted lower
>>30183357
>cook with their raifus?
>>30184026
WTF is a posted lower?
>>30184087
sorry posted gas block
i was in a hk state of mind
>>30177395
Damn dude what all do you have?
>>30184115
can you put wood furniture on any model G3?
>>30184115
How high above the stock is the centerline of that scope?
FN-49 vs. AG-42 vs. Hakim vs. SVT-40 vs. Mas-49/56 vs. Garand
Who wins?
>>30184187
G3 wood yes; CETME wood like that requires minor modification/fitting.
>>30184219
SCAR 17
>>30184218
Like 3 inches, but the benifits is you can still use irons
>>30184187
>>30184220 is correct that is cetme wood on a ptr and I did have to modify it
>>30177410
>not liking crossdressing
where do you think you are?
>>30184299
QD scope mounts and offset irons are a thing
Well for other rifles.
>>30184220
>minor modification/fitting
i didnt know a grinder, drill, couple of files, and a hammer was minor
>>30184218
Best I could do
>>30184341
Any port in a storm.
>>30184325
You just need a drill for the hand guard, for the stock I had too take a threaded rod that fit into the ptr trunion and tack weld two nuts to it
>>30184298
I'm obviously want a WW2 rifle you fucktard
>>30184413
Why something so outdated?
>>30184443
He probably doesn't want to buy a rifle that costs fucking three thousand dollars.
>>30180452
I've got well over $4000 in optics for other rifles. I have no problem buying a good value scope for short-medium range
>>30184469
For the historical value, for the pleasure of owning a weapon that's hard to come by, for the post WWII battle rifle aesthetics.
>>30184469
Why is that a problem with the rifle?
>>30184497
How isn't it? Price greatly affects how much it compares to other rifles to the buyer. Why do you think people love the Mosin on this board even though they're utter dog shit? But on the way of performance there's no reason to debate. It's obviously much better than the other older rifles.
>>30184115
>>30184135
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH YOUR CARPET HAS IT BEEN ON YOUR FLOOR SINCE 1970? FUCKING KILL YOURSELF
>>30184564
Choose to not be poor
the twins
>>30185029
Both standard,?
Longest shot you've made with the scout?
Have you benched them?
If so, how did accuracy compare?
>>30184629
So much anger in this fregg.
>>30177410
We get it, he cross dresses and you don't like it. Grow up, faggot.
>>30184307
Sa/k/uya turn on trip pls
>>30187280
i dont turn it off thanks though
>>30184219
Can I get a non-shitpost answer, please?
>>30187331
Your the one who has to live with it. Why dont you decide whichever ones makes you lust for it the hardest and go for it.
>>30177402
>too poor for a proper handguard
>>30187855
On some level its not entirely the problem of the G3clone owner. You see, taken as a group, the average G3clone owner is quite poor. There would be little money made producing a superior handguard made out of modern materials to exacting standards.
>>30181615
>>30182385
>>30182599
Wrong. Lmao one of you mentions the gunplumber and in the same breath imbels are inferior receivers, you should know he will always recommend an imbel. Especially now.
http://www.falfiles.com/forums/showthread.php?p=4243795
This is an issue with l1a1 yes but they mention other issues regarded as the "norm" with coonans metric receivers and their change of policy/warranty.
Imbel master race, dsa even has their warranty and still in fact sells forged receivers I don't know why nobody checks their site.
>>30188215
>Still
The batch of forged they have is a limited run.
Imbel is fine. Master race? idontthinksotim
Put your trip back on you deaf fagit
Posting it again I guess, since it's one of the less commonly owned rifles. Especially since it's in 308.
>>30183971
>no ability to mount buis
>the ugliest of all the commonly available wood furniture sets
Why?
>>30189634
Look at his build. Its bargain basement all the way around.
Once all this moving nonsense is over, I'll finally be comfortable spending money again and it'll be time to put an M-LOK rail of some kind on this mess.
>>30177395
I got to shoot a dude's M14 at the range, you might have not seen it.
>>30189737
Going for this, decided to try and capture at least a little of that 60s aesthetic.
>>30189765
Oh anon, your not really going.......
>>30189778
You got a problem with wood, son?
>>30189865
Its fine for flooring.
But mostly I have a problem with you thinking that a wood stock and grip are going to give a "60s aesthetic" to something. If you want to go for a retro build, go for a retro build. Not that abortion you posted.
What is the general opinion on m1a socom 16?
>>30189897
So you don't like wood.
And no, I don't want a "retro build". I'm not willing to sacrifice 50+ years in advancements on optics or the practicality of a modern free float system for nostalgia.
That guy shouldn't have sacrificed the folding stock or compromised on the optic either unless he literally only wants the gun for range time.
My rifle will be used for medium and large game.
>>30189979
The truncated action makes a rifle with reliability issues even less reliable. But as far as desperate measures to modernize an aging design, its not terrible.
>>30190000
But what does a wood A2 stock have to do with the 60s?
Or a wooden grip?
>>30190034
Nothing. I said aesthetic. I'm not going for any kind of historical accuracy, I just like the way wood furniture looks on FALs and G3kin but I want a rifle that actually has something to offer in terms of accuracy.
>>30190058
>Accuracy
Then why did you go with a SW .308 AR?
Honestly, wringing out 1.5moa or better out of an FAL or G3 isnt that hard, and thats about what your rifle is probably getting. Im not sure where you got your information.
>>30189061
*7.5 French
Century converted a few to .308 but for the most part the conversions where shit.
tfw one of those nuggetfest traps shoots your battle raifu
>>30188236
>being this hurt
what post caused the pain?
>>30189737
>>30189765
ar10s without a front post or full rails for days trigger me
>>30190086
bent mag
>>30190563
most century owners are too poor to afford ammo to know that their rifle is actually shit
>That Belgian supremacy
>>30191047
I wasnt speaking of your trip.
There are other, deafer, trips who post here.
Your not a special and unique snowflake
>>30190008
Can you elaborate? It would be my first battle rifle.
>>30190086
>Consistent 1.5 MOA
>Easy to get out of a PTR or FAL
Get a load of this guy. If you get that out of either of those rifles you're lucky. And with the right load, at that.
As for the M&P, it'll shoot 1.5MOA with any ammunition you feed it in its base factory stock form, including the flimsy, non floated M4 handguard, car stock, and 9lb trigger. Go ahead, Google it. You can find at least a half dozen independent accuracy reports that confirm this, with most of them shooting MOA with at least one of the tested loads.
That means that with a decent load, a good trigger, and a free float, this will beat out any PTR or FAL you can get your fat greasy mitts on hands down.
Hell, there's even a range report on GA where some guys make repeatable consistent 1000 yard hits on a 14" plate with a 12x optic, prs stock, and Magpul handguards not too far off of my current setup.
But keep talking yourself into a hole, or maybe post your rifle anon.
>>30191118
The M14 wasnt designed with such a short action in mind. The 2" longer scout model springfield makes has a full length action, and is known to be more reliable.
Now it has been awhile since I heard about the socom issues, and there has been time for improvements. But if I had my heart set on a short M1A, I would do some leg work and see if they resolved the issues, or just resign yourself that it might not be perfect.
There are other options out there for a traditional stocked semi auto .308 with 20 round mags though...
>>30191100
playing tsundere i see
>>30191118
just get a original woody
>>30191122
>any ammo
yeah no
nearly all ar10s excluding a select few are long range bench queens seriously your on the ar platform you already fucked up
>>30191147
>FNAR
do you actually live in a cuck state?
>>30191160
Shit looking for something shorter though. Would the scout be acceptable?
>>30191122
Let me get this straight, you take offense that I said that your rifle will get 1.5 moa. Then post a bunch of shit about how it will get 1.5 moa.
Getting an FAL to do 1.5 moa is mostly an issue about getting a good barrel, which is not easy to do these days. I had to have one made. Also good lockup, which can be had with an oversized locking lug, and a good rigid forend, and there are some on the market to get that going.
Go google it up.
>>30191160
Asking bicurious george to put his trip on is not asking you to put your trip on. Your just overly sensitive about other anons using that line in reference to you.
This may be a bit of a surprise, but not everything is about you.
>>30191183
as the anon said they are known to be slightly less reliable than a regular m1a so if you are fine with a pure range toy or trying your luck buy one just dont think you have something thats going to chew sand and dirt with no problems
>>30191218
i dont believe it
>>30191160
Not trying to derail the thread but u were the most handsome man at nuggfest desu desu
>>30191189
I didn't take offense at anything, just pointing out that if you think its "easy" to get 1.5MOA out of a PTR or FAL you're kidding yourself. And why bother, when an off the shelf AR10 will do that or better at the same price point.
More importantly, it'll shoot much better than that if you put in any work (like finding a good load or floating it), and takes nothing but a barrel swap to be a sub moa rifle. So, better out of the box accuracy and better accuracy potential for time and money invested, without exception.
>>30191160
Easy sakuya, contain your shit posting. AR10 is easily a superior rifle in all practical and functional regards to anything posted in this or any battle rifle thread with the possible exception of the SCAR, and even that is only open for discussion.
>>30191526
youre doing that thing where you have one battle rifle and you think its does everything a scar does but youre forgetting it isnt a scar
1000 yards is more the shooter and ammo than anything people do it with off the shelf savages duct taped to 2x4s
br not dmr
>>30191526
>nothing but a barrel swap
Too bad you bought a rifle with a proprietary BCG headspacing, youd need a whole new carrier group if you wanted to get a new barrel.
>Easy to get 1.5 from an FAL
never said it was easy, or cheap. Just possible, and by and large its a known series of things. Its not as easy as an AR-10, it aint as cheap, but it isnt some arcane art.
>AR-10 superiority to a SCAR
Yeah no. Especially to a fricking SW MP10. If you wanted to argue DD, LWRC, KAC, LaRue, GAP, etc as being at the same level as a SCAR, your right. And if your going for a dedicated long range rifle, could be better. But a SCAR isnt a dedicated long range rifle. Its a battle rifle that happens to be highly accurate.
And adding a wood fixed stock and grip to a rifle doesn't give it a "60s aesthetic".
>>30191651
I know you're used to defending your $3000 rifle purchase against the unrelenting assault of poorfags with PTRs, but spare me the bullshit.
I know full well the capability of the SCAR, I own a 16S. It's an exceptional firearm in almost every regard. Before you go off half cocked about it not being the same, it's the same fucking rifle +/- a few percent in component scale. The SCAR is a great gun all around, and the 17 in 7.62x51 is the best battle rifle on the market in terms of guaranteed out of the box performance.
In terms of how it compares to the AR10, it's the same argument as AR-15 vs SCAR16. If you have the money to drop and you want something that does exactly what the SCAR does, it's a great choice. If you want to barbie doll it or need a feature outside the standard SCAR feature set, prefer the ergonomics of the AR, etc, you go AR. If you drop SCAR money on building an AR you can match it in every regard. SCAR is designed for military forces that need the best rifle with consistent performance without having to quibble over part and manufacturer differences. It does that extremely well.
In terms of "value", ARs of any caliber give you better performance per dollar, but that isn't what this discussion is about.
And, in all honestly, if you aren't a poorfag you just get both.
>>30191768
First off, let's get the "you bought" out of the way. I actually received this rifle as part of a manufacturers promotion and didn't pay anything for it but the taxes on the "declared equivalent income" value from S&W. Anything I've changed or added to it was out of pocket however.
You can call me a shill if you want, but I don't work in the firearms industry in any regard any longer so I can't imagine what incentive there would be for me to talk up their guns on an anonymous image board.
>Barrel Swap
You're right, the barrel extension and bolt are proprietary. So if you need / want to swap out the light weight factory barrel that is easily capable of 1-1.5MOA, add $200 to the cost of the first replacement barrel.
>Never said it was easy to get that out of an FAL / PTR
>wringing out 1.5moa or better out of an FAL or G3 isnt that hard
Pick out.
>Talking as if you know anything about the SCAR when you're an FAL poorfag.
Please tell me more about the SCAR. See pic related. >>30191877
You're anti-fanboying against S&W for a reason I have yet to determine. This is the only S&W rifle of any kind I own, and my only other S&W firearm is a snubnose revolver. If you ever come to Western nuggetfest, I'll let you shoot as many rounds out of the M&P as you need to become educated on what you're talking about.
>>30191947
If something isnt easy, it doesnt mean its hard.
Its a known series of issues to tackle. Its not plug and play, but it is doable.
And while yes, I do loves me some FAL, im more a a SCARfag myself, pic related.
Im "anti-fanboi" with the SW because its a budget rifle, with budget parts, and a budget user base. The .308 class ARs ive built were on Mega receivers and mostly noveske barrels, not budget builds.
With getting a rifle essentially for free, putting some budget glass in a budget mount on it, youve gotten a lot of rifle for little cash.
What are you trying to get it to be?
>>30177452
>keystone
what are you a college freshman?
>>30179072
ohhh, who had the ruger match champion?
>>30192018
It is a budget rifle, with a budget optic, in a budget mount. As far as "budget user base" goes, I'm not even sure I know what that is supposed to mean. Do you refuse to shoot firearms with a base cost of less than $2000?
All I'm trying to do is get people to accurately acknowledge the surprising performance capabilities of what is a $1200 rifle in a retail setting. It's not a SCAR, it's not a KAC. It isn't even a sub MOA rifle. It wont stand up to home builds with carefully selected parts.
What is important, is that even this budget AR10 will outperform any rifle in this thread that isn't a SCAR or another, better AR10. That's all I ever said, and you along with the resident tripfag seem intent on denying that when you literally can't do so honestly.
All I'm trying to get this rifle to be is a fun, reliable battle rifle that will spend 95% of its time shooting steel from 100-800 yards and the remaining 5% of its time killing medium to large NA game. It was capable of that out of the box, I'm just working on getting it in line with my own ergonomic and aesthetic preferences.
>>30188236
I've never tripped before though I've been asked to.
An yes indeed master race.
>>30188236
Plus 3 mins since I posted the link, you didn't even read the thread you ignorant bitch.
>>30191877
>>30191947
>I know full well the capability of the SCAR, I own a 16S.
no you don't its a 16s its chambered in designed to wound
>If you have the money to drop and you want something that does exactly what the SCAR does
>If you drop SCAR money on building an AR you can match it in every regard.
except be reliable
>I actually received this rifle
so poorfag then?
>You're anti-fanboying against S&W for a reason I have yet to determine.
i dont fanboy you are pretending youre rifle is more than it is im not. i dont really meantion MOA in a battle rifle thread due to eveb blow up in your face c308s and shake loose m1as hit under 2.5 MOA with a shit shooter and military ammo
>>30192078
close white trash
>>30192135
battle rifles not DMRs
are
you
fucking
retired?
>>30192232
>Designed to wound.
>AR not reliable.
>BATTLE RIFLES NOT DMRS
We already knew you were an aspie, you don't have to keep hammering on it.
Are you actually CuriousGeorge?
>>30192279
no im way to fat (picture related) and dont own century made guns
>>30192313
Both have kind of pudgy arms, but the one on the right has qt eyes. Might give benis to.
Have any sweaty gay sex at NF?
>>30192313
>>30191122
1.Battle rifles aren't made to be bench shot match grade ammo fed bitches.
2.A new production of an ongoing and developing rifle will "beat" cold war era rifles whose development has stagnated years ago.
Nahhhhhh
>>30182944
Dubs confirmed, best battle rifle ever.
>>30191526
Multiple AR's in any caliber get boring after a while.
>>30192471
>>30191877
Just get both.
This.
You can own more than one rifle/gun.
>>30191947
Implying a good fal can't cost as much or more than a scar.
There are more fals than voyagers from dsa and century gambles.
>>30192811
You'd be hard pressed to get an FAL to get much beyond $2k for just the rifle.
>>30192135
Your whole last paragraph sir fuckface is why we buy battle rifles in the first place. The "aesthetics" of the design are part of the draw and the ergonomics or lack thereof are uh duh part of the aesthetic. The rifles are what they are.
You sound like ptr fags used to when they said their shit could do everything a scar could for cheaper. You're just mad I had the money to buy the pretty rifle I wanted that costs more than yours and all you can say about your boring bottom of the barrel build is that it's accurate. Good on you mate.
Im sure hipoints can be accurate with match grade ammo. Imma keep buying what I like tho cuz I can afford it.
You think people buy a spas 12 because its the most accurate reliable shotgun there is? Get the fuck out of here.
>>30192837
Lmfao dude oooo so you get 2 or more magazines with a rifle shut the fuck up. I counted 12 over 2k fals on the first gunbroker page alone.
>>30191047
who dis
Speaking of Tigrs. Hope resizing the image didn't wreck it, spent 3 hours scrubbing this thing.
g-guys, I can use a DMR like a battle rifle rite?
>>30193024
I kno the feel
oiled my fal which didnt have any rust except for the mag where it isnt painted from being rained on still dirty though been about 1600 now since last cleaning
also drinking leftover nuggetfest beer
>>30192394
yeah, me and some old guy fucked a barrett m107a1 so hard it almost broke
>>30192712
this
>>30192720
lwrc makes top meme tier guns in the good way
>>30192837
the gimmick paratrooper ones are rape price doe
>>30192933
yeah if spas12 were 400 bux poorfags would say they are the best shotguns to exist
>>30193008
one of those girls with dicks at nuggetfest
>>30193024
its basically a slavshit fal that costs 6k
>>30193029
yes
>>30192837
>You'd be hard pressed to get an FAL to get much beyond $2k for just the rifle.
Youre a retard. The para rifles from DSA cost $1800 and are on the expensive end. You can get imbel builds for cheap
>>30193029
GUYS LOOK AT ME GIVE ME ATTENTION! I WILL WEAR A SKIRT IF YOU PAY ME SOME ATTENTION!
>>30181583
yeah I've been meaning to, Fireforce was such a great book.
>>30193072
>not knowing who flandre is
>giving the attention whore attention
fucking newfags
>>30193029
I'd fuck the one on the right..
>>30193177
guess you havent seen her videos then
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syIA8oFmb70
>>30189634
This >>30189648, plus walnut costs $300, and the laminate actually looks decent in this application. As for no buis, 1) it's a range toy, and 2) my eyes are so profoundly fucked that irons are pointless.
The whole point of the build was to see how cheaply I could put together a .308 AR that was accurate, functioned, and wasn't fugly (ever see a .308 that's pretending to be an M4? Like a landwhale in a cocktail dress). It cycles very well with certain loads, and shoots 1" groups all day long, for $800, including FFL and S&H. I like it, therefore, worth it.
reporting in.
>>30193188
I stand by what I said.
>>30193188
what a qt
>>30182811
JohnEden is that you?
>>30193222
Nope.
Who is a johneden?
>>30193211
>Expensive Rifle
>Redfield optic
I genuinely don't understand why people buy shitty optics for decent guns.
>>30193252
They blew their wad on the rifle, have nothing left and no motivation to save for good glass.
>>30193233
Alt-righter, on therightstuff forum. Posted a rifle just like yours. almost the same rifle really, But now that I look at it. it's a bit different.
>>30190000
If you'd like to open up your forend wood options to include split handguards, while retaining a free floated barrel, look at a national match free float tube. It's a competition free float tube that allows you to mount traditional handguards on your match rifle, and still stay in restricted match categories. $100 or so.
>>30193069
I dont think you understand what hard pressed means.
>>30193252
They run out of money I guess, being poor and saving up for your dream rifle or something expensive for a few years means not always being able to buy optics.
I do agree however put an expensive optic on it if you can afford it, if not whatever.
>>30193260
I would rather shoot a rifle with irons for a year than buy a shitty optic. At least buy something mid-grade if you have low demands from the gun. I didn't blow full swaro money on a Swarovski for my .300WM, but I did buy a mid grade Zeiss.
I didn't buy a Mark 8 for my AR10, but I did buy a mid grade Leupold.
And I didn't buy a US Optics for my AR15, but I did buy an ACOG.
I just spend 6-12 months shooting those guns with irons, or not shooting them at all, until I could buy something reasonable.
>>30193262
The NF 2.5-10x32 is absurdly common. I was not creative with my choices.
Whats an alt-righter?
>>30193278
I have an aimpoint M4 that never really finds a home on any rifle. So new stuff gets to wear that until I get nice and settled on what its going to have on it.
>>30193188
girls can have dicks
>>30193196
you know the ar10 came first right? so every shitty ar15 is just the try hard little sister
>>30193177
her dick is very feminine
>>30193211
how many moas do you get with that stock
>>30193252
>>30193260
>>30193274
picture related
>>30193264
it looks so dumb
>>30193288
what poltards call themselves to normies
>>30193252
>>30193260
>>30193274
>>30193278
for the record this is all my LGS had at 50mm objective. beats the piss out of some centerpoint turd.
I had been shooting it for 2 years on irons.
but yeah i agree, much better choices out there.
just thought i'd clear that up
>>30193319
At least they understand its something to be ashamed of and make up SJW tier names to hide behind.
>>30193319
1.5 due to the occasional flier
in a fiberglass glass stock with unitized HG retainer and the typical shaving/shimming to accurize it shoots just as well though.
and weighs a fuck ton less.
>>30193319
>>30193264
I considered that, but theres no way to get a set of BUIS on that and the factory barrel wont support an A2 FSP unfortunately. I've thought about it, I would just also need to swap the barrel which means barrel and BCG. Just not worth it for me.
>>30193361
>doesnt like 20lbs of m14s
>>30193425
rude i mean you dont even like giving a reach around?
i mean in like the last week ive only like shot over a dozen different battle raifus
>>30193459
you are as right as >>30183027
unless you're shooting from a rested position have fun
>>30193533
wish i could find a cheek riser that was worth while.
what one is that? looks reliable enough
>>30193620
Get a kydex one
>>30193640
those looked like such garbage though... you talking about those "coyote" ones or w/e?
kydex for like $130 makes me want to pass
>>30193726
$60, and get it in whatever color you want.
http://www.karstenskydexcheekrest.com
>>30193743
ahhhh i see. sorry to say but not about to drill holes through my only synthetic stock at the moment.
I will keep this in mind though. $60 for an a3 style riser ain't bad
>>30193778
Cheapo cloth ones can be had for like $15 and up
>>30177410
He should kill himself for being a shitty person with a abrasive personality.
>>30177402
stop please I can only get so erect
>>30177452
What part of the state / what range do you to?
I'm moving to VA in a few weeks for a job and I've heard there's not many places to shoot unless you own property.
>>30195590
same
>>30195907
>being that easily turned on
>>30195928
naw i was just down there for the summer /k/ meetup. we just used the public range near blacksburg in the national forest
>>30193029
Frankieq1080p does it.
>>30177412
Was on Danish national guard exercise this weekend where we worked with some Lithuanian soldiers who were equipped with this baby
>>30197462
literally who?
>>30197688
nice
>>30193029
DMR and Battle Rifle: not necessarily the same thing, it would have to be in a full size rifle caliber to be both, some DMRs are made in intermediate calibers usually on the AR platform in the US.
>>30192313
Oh hey did you take any other pictures or videos of me at nuggetfest? If you did could you send them to me?
>>30182385
>Gook vehicle
>Foreign rifle
>American flag
This is the most american picture on this site
>>30193029
Flandre will u b my exotic treasure from the far east?
>>30199543
Globalize me, Cap'n
>>30183724
>I kind of want one, mostly because I want a .308 rifle.
They aren't naturally found in 308.
From everything I'm told about the conversions like mine, I got really lucky not to have a $485 single shot rifle or an outright paperweight.
I forget who, but I know there are people who do more proper conversions than century. They apparently do fixes to lemon century conversions too.
>Are there any reliable scopes for the MAS-49?
I know there's mounts, just like there are for ak side rails. The legit french scopes are ridiculously expensive. I think they cost as much or more than my whole rifle did.
>>30192313
The statist scum on teh right is FBI and cannot be trusted.
It's always the most mundane ones too.
>>30197352
wat happened to the recap thread creep was going to start last night
>>30199532
tits or gtfo
>>30199739
It filled up and timed out, check the archive.
>>30193061
>liking russians
>>30199543
Probably more American made parts on that Toyota than in a GMC or Ford.
>>30192313
Why do you wear things like this? What's the purpose?
Why SVD not a battle rifle?
>>30199979
Mine was built in Indiana, at any rate. Most full-size pickups are made in NA from majority NA parts simply because the NA is the biggest market.
>>30177395
I just bought my ptr.
>>30200150
>Slavshit
>PTR
at least your consistent.
>>30200150
>>30200258
#StampedLyfe
>>30200360
That might be part of my reason for disliking both rifles. I dont think sheet metal is a good material to produce quality firearms from. Its a good material to make cheap shit from.
I want to get a battle raifu for a good price but it can't be complete shit. I was thinking of buying an AR-10 lower, upper, chamber, barrel, etc. and using AR-15 parts where possible. This idea could be complete shit so I'm asking for your guys' advice.
>>30200543
>AR15 parts where possible
At best this is going to be fire control parts, stock/reciever extension, bolt/mag release, pistol grip, handguards (there are like two models that will let you do this, and they both ship as full rifles.)
Whats your budget?
>>30200399
One chocolate has been added to your account.
>>30200816
>but the swiss make better chocolates
>>30200574
I haven't much right now, but I net little over $260 a week.
Am I late?
>>30201998
I came a little just seeing that beauty.
And is that your finger coming out of your zipper?
>>30201700
$260 for gun budget or $260 total? if its the latter, you might want to just save your money.
