Are combat flight sims /k/ approved?
>>30018481
I've been playing Falcon 4.0 since it came out in 1998.
I'm fully convinced I could pilot an F-16 if necessary.
>>30018527
I've been trying to get into BMS as of 3 weeks ago, shits tough
>>30018481
The Mig-21 DCS module is dank. Comfy night interceptions of B-52s
>tfw DCS fucks up on my PC so I can't run it
life is fucking suffering
>>30018542
MiG 21 is my favourite module so far. Splashing shitters who take F-15Cs and nothing else never gets old
[spoiler]I wish DCS wasn't so trash at simulating missiles. And ED cared about the online netcode or multiplayer in general.[/spoiler]
>>30018527
>>30018527
until you realize halfway down the runway the physical forces of gravity and inertia make shit a lot harder than a videogame. then you blackout
>>30018541
Keep in mind that pic related is the instruction manual.
>>30018563
I've flown a Cessna. I know it's two completely different types of aircraft. I'm not saying I could do it well, or even land a real one, but damnit I could at least keep it going in the air long enough to eject.
>>30018549
>I wish DCS wasn't so trash at simulating missiles
It will never get old watching people claim DCS is super realistic in that regard.
>>30018590
I mean I've been just fucking through it using video tutorials and a friend who knows. I don't know the difference between BMS and Falcon 4.0 but I'm slightly ok at it I guess
>>30018831
>The R-77 will never be good in DCS
>>30018481
They always have been /k/ since before /k/ was made. The Combat Flight Simulator series are one of the best
Where does Allied Force rank in the Falcon-world?
>>30018590
I'm pretty sure you could land it. The flight path vector indicator makes it so easy.
I wish I had tons of money to build myself a pit.
>>30018527
dont we all. i could definitely fly an apache if i could just find one
Who else is HYPE AS FUCK for F5E?
>youtu.be/OguO6CaKjKY
I knew there was a reason brothers. but I could give a fuck about the F5E or the Gazelle, I WANT THE F/A-18C. anyone else hyped as fuck that it might be out this year?
>>30018481
I want a StarVR headset, HOTAS set, leap motion or something like that, and an F-35 simulator.
>>30018590
i have 3 3" binders of unclassified material on how to fly a F-15E, plus one more classified one. plus a bunch of pubs on it that's probably another 3" worth of data. plus a 3-1.Shot Kill so i know if i actually hit what i'm aiming at. plus 3-1 and 3-3 which are a binder each. plus the flight manual which is another binder. plus a weapons manual which is (you guessed it) a 3" binder worth of stuff. and i'm responsible for knowing all of it (or at least knowing where it is)
so yeah... no you can't fly a F-16 effectively.
>>30019532
fighters are easy to fly, difficult to employ.
>>30021010
you mean mig-28, right?
>>30021062
That will be my starting point for modern sims.
>>30021062
>be thrustmaster
>host new product reveal on carrier
>everyone eagerly awaiting F-18 HOTAS
>it's a shitty budget entry joystick and pedal
Talk about a major letdown... DCS Hornet would have been badass with high fidelity controls to go with it. Maybe some day.
