/k/ approved movies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ed_jTFrZkY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHUbiL36yjo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mI3QaSoJado
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VKQkg9cpio
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUlMUkd7IWU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K40Gt3dk1LY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV79EIZVuHQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMU9Yos0mkk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJCltwaUrXI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U3F1uDBXrw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLyhRYJXf1U
>>29837098
>U-571
>Literally has an underwater submarine dogfight in it
>/k/
Insert coins, try again.
>>29837144
>What should we do with the armchair generals Herr Kapitan?
>Kill zem, kill zem all
>>29837098
>Americans taking credit for things they didn't do in a wildly unrealistic manner
Fuck off
>>29837348
It's just a fun movie, it never says what's depicted is true
>>29837377
Do you think the average viewer who gets all their historical knowledge from movies like this knows that? It also wasn't even that good of a movie anyway.
>>29837402
>no fun allowed
Posting underrated, never mentioned movie
>>29837402
Not every movie is based gettysburg
>>29837348
They credited the crews of the Royal Navy that captured the U-boats at the end of the movie you fuck.
Badlands is GOAT /k/ino
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5ueZVghqkyI
The quote in this scene about shooting the devil is pretty /k/
>>29837098
>U-571
Mediocrity without historical merit, watch a good sub movie instead.
>>29837437
i've mentioned it before in similar threads.
its an awesome film, i just don't know why it doesn't get more love.
>>29838005
Sure, just like they credited the Canadian government in Argo by explicitly stating at the end of the movie that the CIA would "let" the Canadian government take credit for the operation.
>>29838072
Uh, no. Rewatch U-571, at the end the specifically state those responsible
How about "Look who's back"?
>>29841220
That's just /pol/ approved
