How many of these can you check off?
>>29745889
>white
>male
>married
>kid
As soon as I saw the older than 50 category I noped out. Sorry gramps, survey says this thread blows. Op goofed it.
>>29745889
All of them but the age, being married, having children, and having college education.
23, no kids, no significant other (thankfully) and only a high-school diploma.
>>29745889
Can check those all off except the age, marriage, children, lives in the south and college
>male
check
>white
white hispanic so barely
>married
no
>children
hope not
>south
nope
>50-64
nope
>suburbia
nope
>some college
yup, haven't graduated yet
>independent leans republican
yup
>owns guns for protection
yup
>hunting
nope
and I'm against any form of gun control. Felons should be able to own guns.
>>29745889
>high-capacity ammunition clips
Tells me everything I need to know about the bias going into this
I don't have a degree yet but I'll be starting college
>>29745889
>has some college 27%
>has a college degree 28%
so 55% of gun owners are college educated. that means there are more people who have attended college who own guns than those who are afraid of inanimate objects. The doublethink is real.
>56% of gun owners live in the north
dat doublethink
>49% of gun owners are democrat
kek
that part about gun owners being 80% white is bullshit. the only blacks and hispanics I know that don't have a gun are felons. And even then, most of the felons have guns.
>>29745990
>that means there are more people who have attended college who own guns than those who are afraid of inanimate objects. The doublethink is real.
oh good god you're statistically illiterate
55% of gun owners are college educated. 55% of college educated people do not necessarily own guns.
>>29745889
Nearly all of the above, except for age, location, and (sort of) politics.
Also what the heck gun owner doesn't enjoy owning a gun?
>>29745990
>serious implications
>small scale survey
I haven't looked into it but I dont think the scope of this survey was very large
>>29745889
One, closing the gunshow and private sales loophole. Because felons and perpetrators of domestic violence need to be kept away from guns at all costs.
>>29746010
>being a faggot
k den. still the exact opposite of da ebil southerner gun nut stereotype. Add in trade schools and certifications and you'd probably see gun owners as 75%+ "educated"
>>29746046
Whatever the case may be please don't blindly misread statistics and make an argument from your misunderstanding it makes us all look like idiots.
>>29745889
>male
Does being a trap count? Or would this fall in the LGBT/faggot category?
>white
>lives in suburbia
>has some college
>politically independent
>owns guns for protection
>believe its more important to protect gun rights
>believe stricter gun laws would make it harder to protect families
>believe stricter gun laws would give government too much power
>not in favor of AWBs
>enjoys owning a gun
>is in favor of background checks (shit needs to be entirely reformed though)
>not in favor of capacity limits
>believe owning a gun makes me safer
>believe stricter laws will take away my guns
>>29746050
tranny pls go
if you're just a crossdresser we good
>>29746016
>>29746039
kill yourself statist
>muh battered whimmen!
>which is why they should have to wait 3 days to buy a handgun through an FFL instead of cash and carrying it because guns are private property and an intrastate transaction can't be regulated by the Federal government
>in the name of safety we must keep her from getting a gun to fight off her ex boyfriend when he violates an unenforced restraining order and beats her to death with a tire iron.
>>29745951
>Felons should be able to own guns
Finally someone who shares this view with me. I have never had a criminal conviction in my life nor have I ever been arrested, however, people who have should not be punished for one mistake for the rest of their lives. You don't keep spanking a child for swearing.
>>29746061
You hate real trannies, but like faggoty fetishists? lolwut
>>29746071
There's a very straightforward argument for that position and it's almost impossible to argue against: if someone's too dangerous to own a gun, they're too dangerous to be free to begin with.
>>29745889
So 22% of people in America that own guns dont like guns? Why??
White male southerner unmarried childless libertarian leaning college student here
>>29745951
> I'm against any form of gun control
I agree with you here, but saying that scares libs.
How do we convince them to embrace freedom?
>>29746050
God you people are always so thirsty for attention.
>>29746080
maybe they own one out of necessity.
>i dont like owning a gun but i need it to keep me safe
or maybe they have some kind of naive outllook on it
>i own a gun but wish i didnt have to
>>29746079
Which is why certain individuals should never be let back out.
>murderers
>rapists
>child molesters
>terrorists
>human traffickers/slave traffickers
>gangsters/street thugs
Once a violent degenerate, always one.
>>29746075
To be transgender requires the lunatic belief that a biological man can actually be a woman or vice versa. It is the ideology that I have a problem with.
>>29746083
>How do we convince them to embrace freedom?
see
>>29746079
for example. That said, guns inherently scare liberals on an emotional level so I essentially believe that nothing can break that idiotic belief unless you present them with something scarier than guns that requires guns to stop.
>clip
Back to your safe space
>78% enjoy owning a gun
What? Why own a gun if you don't like it?
Also nice try with
>79% in favor of background checks for private and gun show sales
Fuck you
>>29745889
>enjoys having a gun (78%)
>yeah i have a gun or two but god dammit i hate that i have it.
>>29746105
>>29746109
>What? Why own a gun if you don't like it?
look I know we're all hobbyists on /k/ to a certain degree but I'm sure y'all can understand why someone might own a gun for personal safety reasons
>>29745990
>55% of gun owners are college educated
The national average is something like 41%
This bodes well for us
>>29745889
>79% in favor of background checks for private sales
>garbageman.jpg
>>29746115
I mean i get it i guess, i just don't understand that mindset, i feel like if they genuinely didn't enjoy it there are other alternatives for protection.
>>29746149
there are no better alternatives
>>29746156
true
Joe Biden BTFO
Want to know what made me rage uncontrollably?
The college part. It breaks up the college into "has degree" and "some college", and tries to make them seem super low. "Some College" covers vocational/trade school certifications gained through a college. I have to put "some college" down on all my applications because I have a license and a certification. The Certification amounted to nearly 3 years of college. So yes, I'm on of those "uneducated gun owners" who didn't get a regular degree.
Then the other thing. The other rage inducing thing there is that it cuts out military members who are pro-gun and have education/training.
Either way, you add it up and over 50% of gun owners have some form of higher education. When you compare that to the most anti-gun demographics in our society, it's about even with them, or way, way, way more.
>>29746172
I don't think that's intended to be misleading, you're just oversensitive about this one senpai.
>>29745889
I live in California and I don't favor background checks. I match everything else.
>>29745889
>enjoys owning a gun
>78%
So 22% of the people interviewed were noguns apparently.
>>29746156
I didn't say better alternatives
>>29746204
If you fear for your life, why would you settle?
>>29746183
I think it is. Just like the "White" one, and the "Enjoys owning a gun" one.
Yes the largest segment of the U.S. population will own a larger portion of guns. And yes most people who own guns will like guns.
>>29746209
You right. Shutting up now.
>>29746080
they own hi points
>>29746183
i have to agree. such is life.
>>29746213
You're just touchy dude. This isn't terribly misleading or judgmental about anything.
How is 30% representative of an average?
>>29746224
The whole thing is misleading dude.
>>29746050
If you are a tappy trap, then no
Post a pic and if we notice that you're male, then it counts
>>29746256
Unless the actual stats are incorrect, it's kosher.
>>29745889
>high-capacity ammunition clips
fuck i'm mad
>>29745889
I don't see how most of this stuff relates to gun ownership specifically
a lot of these percentages are probably just the norms for everyone
>>29745889
> Average
> 31%
that's not even the lowest one
in b4 liberal cuck
>>29746071
I don't even care if someone is dangerous. Life is a game but we play for keeps, firearms for all, whether felon or not.
>>29746280
>not knowing correct stats can be made to mislead people.
>That graph my internet provider shows me where their brightly colored bar on the graph is double the height of the 2nd place competitor is totally true
>15% better internet speed is TOTALLY twice as tall when depicted visually.
Point is, they are doing the same think in that picture as the media tries to do by stating "OVER 8000 PEOPLE DIED BECAUSE OF XYZ", even though 8000 people constitutes as an extreme minority within the U.S. population, and they are trying to use correct numbers to illicit an incorrect response.
>>29745927
you support NICS checks for private sales? jesus
>>29745956
The phrase alone doesn't show any form of bias whatsoever. It's the phrase used when discussed in legislation.
I would love to see their face when thry put it like that in wording should a ban ever happen. we could continue to use magazines no problem.
>>29745990
I think it should really be read "80% of people that own guns and admit to owning guns on an anonymous survey are white"
>>29746533
Actually I think all guns and weapons should be banned, even kids toys and butter knives.
Weapons make me nervous and thus no one should have any.
>>29745889
Self reported surveys are unreliable and are the bottom of the barrel for statistical analysis. Think of all the people that weren't sampled, or chose not to fill it out.
>>29745889
I'm no American, but I can check twelve.
68%!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bretty "average" according to this I guess.
>>29746070
Just met a chic that shot her stalker to death. Had a neighbor that became a trapper because he killed a guy that knocked him out and kidnapped him, so now he's no-guns and tiny pocket knife (which is what he killed the guy with ironically) and my mom works with a lady that killed her abusive bf a few years ago.Good times
>>29745889
>male
Yes
>white
Nope multi-racial consider myself more black than white
>children
Nope
>south
Thank god no!
>50-56
20
>suburbia
Nah small ass garbage town
>college
Not yet hoping some soon
>independent leaning republican
No, democratic socialist
>own guns for protection
A little bit to scared, it's more for fun.
>hunting
Never done it,probably won't ever do it.
Not a big fan of gun control unless it's for mentally unfit people.
>let the ass hurt commence kek
>is a gun owner
>doesn't enjoy owning guns
Who the fuck is that 22% of faggots who don't like their guns?
>>29745889
i mean
the only thing i can see that make me average are the political views and that i live in the south
other than that im just some black gay idiot
>>29746079
Issues there include plenty of non-violent/non-dangerous/accidental felonies which happen all of the time.
As for being dangerous, it's up to who decides what dangerous is.a guy with multiple assault charges is dangerous sure. But there are people that think guns, being inanimate objects, are dangerous.
>>29746787
Maybe it's the people who don't like them but need them for their jobs. Why do you all keep asking this fucking question
>>29745889
I call utter horseshit on at least half of those stats. So damn near four in five gun owners in the country -- which are supposedly white Southerners for the most part -- are in favor of closing the 'gun show loophole'? Gimme a fucking break.
More or less common sense
>>29746803
Maybe because /k/ is an echo chamber for gun enthusiasts and we couldn't possibly comprehend the concept that somebody might own guns and not like them.
>>29746887
So now that we know your views on guns, how do you feel about walls?
>>29745889
Don't hunt, born and live in mi and turn 31 this year. I wouldn't care about expanded background checks if it were quick, cheap and easy, or automatic with cpl
>>29746083
White/Hispanic male southerner unmarried childless libertarian leaning college student
>How do we convince them to embrace freedom?
I think that's something they're gonna have to come to on their own.sure we can let some of em pop a few soda cans, some will see the light after a run in with a scary situation and some will simply grow up. They may be loud but at the end of the day, the 2A crowd is still the one holding the cards that matter. If worse comes to worse and the libs somehow get their way...well that what the 2A is for. But that is the worst case.
>>29745889
>more exclamatory info-graphics based on outright lies and disinfo being held up as universal facts.
>and too much of the idiot american masses swallow it up
>and this list could just as well fit their "profile of a terrorist" info-graphic
nah, not interested.
>>29745889
>in favor of background check for private sales
>>29745889
>Ethnically Mexican
>20
>Going to college, education major (yes I know)
>live in suburban area
>no children
>not married
>occasionally date, but end up single, don't mind
>politically independent I guess
>Know more gun laws would make it difficult not to just protect our families and ourselves, but our rights and future
>own guns for memes first, then hobby and protection
>is autistic about clips
>knows owning a gun can save my life
>not in favor of any more gun control bullshit. We should enforce the laws we have
>>29746079
I know a guy who is a felon. He is a registered sex offender for having sex with his girlfriend. He had just turned 20, and the girl was just about to turn 18. They were engaged, and had plans and everything. Their only crime was being dumb and in love, but now he doesn't have the right to his life, nor his right to be free from a tyrannical government
>>29746753
>No, democratic socialist
Don't worry. You'll grow out of it once you take a hard look at some of your fellow travelers.
>>29746198
Or they are just having a gun as a tool and are indefferent about it. I know some hunters like that. A gun is a tool for them.
>>29746920
I'm >>29747055
I know it's probably just a joke, but. I think it's stupid. You can't just fence off a chunk of land and expect it to work. This is literally what we say about gun control. I'm not in favor of illegals, and very much resent a lot of them since it took me a lot of work to naturalize, and didn't have anything while they got a bunch of support and had rights and privileges I didn't have despite growing up and living in the states all my life. But a wall won't work, and even deporting them will only treat the symptoms.
It's a real shitty situation. We'd need to completely legalize and decriminalize weed and maybe some other drugs, and then invade Mexico, overthrow the government and set up a a new temporary government for a few generations. But we all know how that works out in the end.
>>29746100
>biological man
The molecular basis of sex characteristics is not as simple as "XX or XY." Remember that genes must be "expressed" through protein synthesis in transcription and acetylation/methylation changes the receptiveness of the DNA to this process (this is why you can't grow a clone of yourself from a cheek cell, for instance, why skeletal muscle doesnt shit out sex hormones and why stem cells are so highly prized.) Beyond that, endocrinology is a very complex and fickle mistress. Gynecomastia, irritability, moodiness and deficits in impulse regulation in men taking steroids for bodybuilding, as well as the (though inadequate) evidence for non-dose dependent estrogenic effects of BPA (effects observed at lower doses than ones with no observed effects) show that small, seemingly insignificant environmental factors and the action of unrelated genes can potentially have a large impact.
So gender essentialism doesn't really bear out, even though the SJW bleats about "social constructs" stay as asinine as ever. I try not to form views on whether it's "right" or "wrong," but the best evidence right now shows hormone replacement and reassignment surgery in general to be a more effective treatment than counseling to accept birth sex, though the latter may be more effective in certain people. Psychology isn't what you'd call a hard science, like ballistics
[see, I made it relevant]
>>29747130
>wanting to make Mexico into iraq 2.0
I think I prefer a wall to another war that goes on for 15 years.
>>29746097
>>29746115
You'd think that they would enjoy the benefits of owning one, however.
>>29746217
>they own hi points
This is a better theory.
>>29747102
>le grow out of it maymay
Ok Fudd
>male
>white
>lives in the South
>some college (working on my degree)
>right-wing independent
>protection & hunting (& fun)
>yes to both law statements
>not in favor of a ban on >clips
>yes, owning a gun makes me safer
>no AWB 2.0 pls
>guns is fun
>FUCK PRIVATE SALE BACKGROUND CHECKS
>yes, the slippery slope fallacy isn't just a fallacy
>>29747216
"It's not a phase!"
>>29747145
Science, Fuck Yeah!
>enjoys owning a gun 78%
wtf are the other 22% doing
>>29747248
Not changing your views by an inch for forty years doesn't make you right you know
>>29746245
Oh no, it's the tubbyposter from /arg/.
>>29745889
>The average...
>(less than 50%)
You fucking what?
The average American gun owner
>is white, male
>doesn't believe in gun control (fucking obviously)
>is likely to have at least some college
>is likely to lean right
Wow, it's fucking nothing.
>>29746039
>closing the gunshow and private sales loophole
Fuck off with that disingenuous bullshit language. It's not a "loophole." It was deliberately written into the law as an exception.
Call it an exception, fine, but not a "loophole." A loophole would imply that it was an unintended consequence or a fluke of wording.
>male
Yep
>white
Yep
>mmarried
Nope
>cchildren
not that I know of
>south
nope
>50-64
nope
>suburbia
nope
>some college
Currently in college
>independent
Yep
>Leans republican
Not a chance
>owns guns for protection
Nope
>hunting
Not explicitly but I'd like to try one day
The rest is just dumb. Of course I like owning guns, but no we shouldn't ban anything. And non-violent felons should have the right to bear arms the second they leave prison, I think violent felons should have a parole-like period before having the right returned. Voting rights should not be taken from felons period.
>>29747283
owning a gun because their partner does, and hating every minute of it
>>29747283
Probably owns guns for work or defense but doesn't necessarily consider it a hobby or entertainment.
>>29745889
>stricter gun laws will lead to stricter laws which will take guns away from citizens
Isn't that like believing that pouring water on the floor will lead to water being poured on the floor?
>>29745889
>high capacity ammunition clips
>>29747393
>>29745889
>male
>white
>unmarried, no gf
>no kids
>Does Northern Virginia count?
>19, 11 months
>FFX County
>Currently studying chemical engineering
>Last time I took one of those tests, was on the border between anarcho-socialism and syndicalism
>Protection and fun, I'm a vegetarian but have huge respect for hunters
>No to stricter laws
>Gun helps me protect myself
>Like guns
>UBC pls go
>>29747508
It's like the shoulder thing that goes up
>>29745889
>male
yes
>white
yes
>married
no
>children
no
>south
no
>50-64
No, and I highly doubt that's the average
>is politically independent who leans republican
leans democrat, but democrats don't have pro-2A candidate
no
>protection
yes
>hunting
no
>blah blah blah
>is in favor of background checks for private and gun show sales
GET THE ~FUCK~ OUT
>>29745889
>male
>white
>married
>children
>South
>50-64
>suburban (unfortunately)
>college
>Conservative
>protection and hunting
>gun laws = bad
>guns > faggotry
>government = bad
>gibbe clips
>gibbe salt guns
>guns = dead dindus
>guns r fun
>background checks
>slippery slope
This was a sneaky way to fit in that bullshit background check thing
>>29746638
You missed a question.
>>29750680
thank you 4chan for removing all of my check marks
>>29747327
Different anon but, yes it does. Nothing, in four decades, has proven me wrong.
> Male
> White (but I prefer "Scots-Irish")
Not married
No kids
Don't live in the South
Younger than 50
> Live in a suburban area
>College degree (and law degree)
> Politically independent
> Lean Republican (MAGA)
> Owns guns for protection (and fun)
Don't hunt
>Stricter gun laws make it more difficult to protect family
> It is more important to protect rights than control ownership
> Stricter laws would give too much power to the government
> Am DECIDEDLY NOT in favor of ban on magazines, clips, drums, belts, or any other ammo feeding mechanism of any capacity
> Am DECIDEDLY NOT in favor of ban on any kind of semi-automatic gun
> Believes owning a gun makes me safer (and my neighbor that one time)
>Enjoy owning a gun. Also enjoy owning my other guns
Am not in favor of background checks for private sales
> Believe stricter gun laws will lead to even more strict gun laws to take away guns
>>29745889
only 76% of gun owners enjoy owning a gun? then fucking sell it, its not a requirement.
>>29745889
I'd like to meet the 22% of gun owners that don't enjoy owning a gun.
>>29745889
>22% of gun owners don't enjoy owning a gun
Kek. Also it's funny how they "quote" everything.
>male
yes
>white
yes
>married
no
>has children
no
>lives in the south
yes
>50-64 years old
no
>suburbs
yes
>college
yes
>politics
I give more of a fuck about voting for the eve online csm than i do american politics
>protection/hunting
yes/no, though i'm not against the latter
>gun laws
no opinion on this, where i live private sale is legal and only a backround check is required to buy otherwise
>gun rights vs control ownership
what did he mean by this
>stricter laws = gov't get more powerful
yes, citizens need arms to overthrow tyranny
>high-capacity ammunition clips
oh nevermind this is a troll thread
>>29745889
>clips
>>29745889
I can't believe such a high amount want "assault-styled weapons" banned. It has been proven that it wouldn't change a damn thing about crime rates. Fucking illiterates
>>29746083
>How do we convince them to embrace freedom?
Drop them from a helicopter
Boom one less anti-gunner commie faggot.
>>29745889
>high capacity ammunition clips
>>29745889
>the average gun owner
>is married (31%)
31% of gun owners are married.
So... Doesn't that mean that the average gun owner... Isn't married? By like 69% ? The fuck kind of chart is this?
Also,
>believes stricter laws are more strict
Genius, really.
>>29746050
Traps are male. If you identify as female, you are trans.
>>29745889
>Canada
>>29746821
It's simple "leading"
If they asked "Do you support NICS checks on private sales?" The answer would be overwhelmingly NO
So they ask "Do you support closing a loophole?" Without explaining what that would entail.
It's a war of words with antigunners.
Daily reminder: leftists are against justice, thus they're cancer
>>29745990
>56% of gun owners live in the north
No
I guarantee that there were 4 reigons considered, east coast, west coast, north and south
>>29745889
>in favor of background checks
REEEEEEEEE
Yeah most of that applies. I'm partially in favor of background checks for private sales (they already do them at gun shows). Even though it's unenforceable I also think that we're going about it the wrong way. I think most gun owners are law-abiding people who would relish the opportunity to run a background check on the person buying a gun from them if it was something that was inexpensive and easy to do and didn't require a visit to an FFL.
The language of that infographic tells me that it is liberal propaganda.
About everything except the top rows, white male that's it.
>>29758195
gun-control.procon.org
Read this then tell me if you think that still. Seriously I think it's fairly balanced
>>29746080
It's sort of like a car enthusiast owning an Alfa Romeo. It's not something you do because you enjoy it, it's a penance we dutifully burden ourselves with as recompense for a sinful life.
>>29747495
only if it fits their narrative
>black
>i have kids but like.. i pay for child support
>i dont got shit for degrees nigga, im smart
>background checks? no sir.
>i got my deuce deuce from my papa before he got locked up
I'm an 18 year old disabled faggot furry who shoots guns because it helps with crippling depression.
I don't really fall into the "average" for anything.
>>29746070
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-10/ex-bandido-lionel-patea-to-face-murder-after-tara-brown-bashing/6763694
Woman in Australia had her head caved in by her bikie ex boyfriend, despite having a restraining order against him. Not having the right to self defence is a bitch. Had she had a gun, she could have defended herself, but without one you're at the mercy of thugs with heavy pieces of steel.
>>29747458
You only want felons voting rights restored because they generally vote leftist/socialist.
The same vicious cycle behind blacks voting dem for ever more porkbarrelling, leading to ever increasing welfare dependency, fatherlessness and violence. (Why do blacks account for the majority of felons again?)
imo you shouldn't get a vote unless you actually bring something to the table. If you've got no stake in society then all these absurd policies that basically involve pillaging from productive people sound fine. Might be an incentive to get a fucking job too. Otherwise we'll end up with more people consuming government spending than contributing to it. A pyramid with welfare consumers accounting for most of the population and a small tip of working folks actually making stuff happen.
>>29745889
>male
yep
>white?
nope
>married?
yes
>children?
yes
>south?
New England
>50-64?
30-ish
>suburbia?
yes
>college?
4yr bachelor's
>independent republican-ish?
yeah
>owns guns for protection?
yes
>hunting
no
>gun laws make families safer?
no
>gun laws give more power to the gov't?
yes
>AWB?
FUCK NO.
>enjoys owning guns
FUCK YES.
>background checks?
begrudgingly yes
>gun rights over control?
YES.
>favor of hi-caps?
YES!
>guns make me safer?
YES!!!
>gun laws are slippery slopes?
yes, increasingly so.
>>29745889
>white
>live in south
>live in suburban area
>college
>from here down all apply
>>29761460
I think that you've got it backwards.
Poor people don't vote. This is why they get fucked over, and why they stay poor.
>upper class communities have the exact same drug consumption as poor communities, but narcotics prosecutions against poor communities are dramatically more common
>Fortune 500 companies and billionaires use offshore banking to dodge taxes and pay lobbyists to let them do it, while poor people get what little income they have raped by sales tax
>nothing is done to stop outsourcing and deindustrialization, because rich people feel the benefits of corporate profits and cheap labor, but don't feel the drawbacks of wage stagnation and collapsing communities
>clips
>>29745889
>married
I have you guys. That counts right?
>>29745889
>>29750739
>Nothing, in four decades, has proven me wrong
I see you're not married, either.
>>29760647
You'll fall into "average gun death" when you suicide.
>white
>male
>south
>suburb
>working on college degree
>independent
>muh protection muh huntin
Actually, mark everything except over 50, republican, and stricter background checks.
>>29745889
15/19
Not even burger...
>male
>married
>kids
>protection
>hunting
>half-white
>all the typical k views on the gun issues
They left one off.
>22% of American gun owners mistakenly call 'magazines' 'clips'.
>>29762797
I haven't killed myself because my problems are temporary, and I have better things to look forward to in life.
Also, I told my therapist that I would not harm myself or others, much less with a firearm. I told him that I didn't want to be another statistic used against gun ownership.
>>29763379
Goddamn Pat Mac looked like Hulk Hogan in his youth.
>>29746144
Guns are spensive
>>29746513
what the fuck are you talking about
>>29745889
>79% in favor of background checks for private sales.
>clips.
Commie bastards.
>>29746071
Count me in on that viewpoint nigga, I've never had any interactions with the court systems besides a ticket when I was 16 once.
who owns a gun but doesnt enjoy owning it? just sell the thing.
>>29745889
>Male
no
>white
yes
>married
no
>children
no
>south
no
>50-64
no
>suburban area
currently, yes
>College
Engineer, so yes, I have some
>Politically independent
Yes
>For protection and hunting
yes to both
>more difficult to protect families
Yup
>too much government power
I live in CA, I don't need to 'believe'
>not in favor of a ban
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED
>enjoys owning
hell yes
>more important to protect rights
yup. same for any right
>against mag size bans
Of course I'm against the bans, they do fuck all
>makes safer
yup. and the evidence supports that on a national level
>in favor of background checks at shows
they don't work
>stricter laws will lead to even stricter laws
I live in CA, I don't need to 'believe' it because it's true.
>>29763706
>Who owns a gun and believes others shouldn't.
Worthless cunts who don't deserve to vote because they would vote themselves into poverty AND danger.
>>29745889
>enjoys owning a gun 78%
wait, so 22% of gun owners DON'T enjoy owning a gun? wtf
>>29745889
Maybe im just retarded, but i dont think you get to actually say "the average x is y" when less than 50% of x is y.
>>29763891
>wait, so 22% of gun owners DON'T enjoy owning a gun?
They didn't say WHICH gun.
>>29761460
>doesn't believe in gun licenses
>believes in voting licenses
you hypocrite
>Small town, idk if i'd call it suburban.
>didn't finish college because "what the hell am, I doing here?"
>Lean Left, but hell will literally freeze over before we get a pro gun lefty worth a shit.
>I don't think it makes me safer, I think it gives me a better shot at defending myself/loved ones.
>>29745889
Everything except the age, supporting background checks (or any gun laws whatsoever), and being American. Though I guess Alberta is the closest thing to the South that we have up here.
What the fuck is with this background check bullshit they slipped in? And the ammunition clips? Is this some weak antigun propaganda?
>>29745889
Pretty much everything there applies to me except I'm a single, 22 year old black guy living deep behind enemy lines in Commiefornia. Also no kids. Graduating college in a month.
>>29745889
only 6
