I bought this scope.
What is it?
>>29565462
Tapco optic
Better mail it to me
>>29565462
Scope brand scope for when you want to scope what you're scoping you can scope your scope while you scope. Scope!
(I actually know what it is, but I have a feeling you do too. You just wanted to make a "look what I bought thread" and thought this would be cute)
sage
reported
hidden
backtraced
something about niggers
>>29565462
Looks like a Yugoslavian ON-M59
>>29565584
I figured out what it is but can't find any info on what it was ever used for.
>>29565600
do you seriously not know how to google?
fucking retard.
also, how much did you pay for that useless hunk of shit?
It's a hungarian doctor's anal probe magnification lense from the 50's.
>>29565600
It was used on the M57A2
>>29565621
Couldn't find shit on it.
And $35
>>29565631
Oh. Cool. I'd never heard of that actually. I always assumed the Balkans just used Soviet shit.
And seeing as how I'm noticing it mounts sideways looks like I won't be mounting it on my nugget like I'd planned.
>>29565652
>mounting it on my nugget like I'd planned.
Holy balls you are retarded.
>>29565665
Why have you come into my thread just to insult me?
Why hurt you friend?
Why are you in such a mood?
>>29565652
Naw they surplused them all as monoculars, you can usually get them with the leather case and maybe some instructions/optic cleaner.
Just a curiosity to have unless you can get your hands on a M57A2
>>29565652
>Couldn't find shit on it.
really? cause all I did was google zrak on-m59 and the first fucking result told what it was used on (M57A2). googling that told me exactly what that was. goddamn spoonfed fucking retards that are too fucking lazy/stupid to do anything for themselves.
>>29565681
Yea it was listed as monocular. It's actually pretty great quality though so I'm okay with it just filling that role.
Came with the leather case and all that as well.
>>29565691
Again I did the research and couldn't find it.
Why are you in such a bad mood anon?
>>29565681
why wouldnt ot work on a rifle?
would this make a good spotting scope?
i dont own one of these and know nothing about them.
>>29565729
Low magnification and reticle matched to an obsolete AT round.
>>29565709
Pretty obvious you did absolutely zero research.
>>29565729
It's mounted to the side of the launcher.
>>29565747
>Low magnification and reticle matched to an obsolete AT round.
None of this matters for a cheap ass scope.
>>29565462
Looks like an attachment for the Liberator
A lot of these Zrak scopes have a radiation warning decal on them. What do you /k/unts think the radioactive component of scope is? I think it's the lens coating, but I could be wrong.
>>29565652
The ON-M59 can be mounted vertically as well, it was used like this on MG42/53 field tripods. It would probably make a crummy riflescope though
>>29568729
How do I mount it that way though? I'm assuming there is no way to rotate the reticle.
Also I'm not intending it to be super accurate.
>>29568758
>>29565827
>>29565729
>wants to mount an outdated radio active rocket launcher scope on a nugget
wew
>>29565462
OP, your scope looks almost identical to a WWII-era scope, which was mounted on guns on Japanese battleships.
>>29568729
The radioactive component is polonium. It is a common element used to remove static from lenses in photographic shops.
>>29568948
OP, eat the scope
>>29565462
>buys 15 bucks POS on amazon
>thinks he needs to make a thread about it
>>29568969
This is 4chan, not gunboards forums.
>>29565462
its a cool trinket, but also sort of shit and a curio. Its got a radioactive coating on the lens that was made for a single shot, discarding weapon, not an heirloom. Shits probably starting to flake off or turn to dust.
>>29568874
Memes are life desu
>>29565584
Kek
>>29568874
that's probably the most /k/ thing I've read all week, if OP doesn't mount it and post pics he has disgraced this board
>>29568758
I would assume that you can re-orient the reticle if it was designed to be mounted that way.
>Also I'm not intending it to be super accurate
good, I can't imagine that this setup would be even slightly accurate
>>29568948
I would think that it's thorium, they used to use it a lot in lens-protecting compounds back in the day.
You got it from Sportsmans Guide didn't you?
Because that's where I got mine.
>>29568874
Hell I have a SMAW scope fitted to an ACOG base mounted on my AK, everyone has to have a little retarded sitting around somewhere.
>>29570280
Pictures or gtfo
>>29570262
Yep.
