ITT: tanks you want to have sex with
>>29521647
Just because you're fat enough to be confused for one, doesn't mean you should, anon.
>>29521667
maybe he has a a exhaust pipe tier penus
>>29521647
All of them. Except the t-34. Either than that literally any and all tanks
ERA bricks are like lingerie to tanks
>>29521647
>Wanting to do it with one of the biggest sluts in the T-72 family.
Wew lad
>>29522093
you mean makeup on a cheap whore
>>29521647
>you will never have a threesome with Tiger I and Leopard 2
suffering
gimme that sweet sweet T-64 ass
>>29522252
>Not wanting the way younger T-80
>no KT yet
Totally not a lolicon
>>29522233
Jesus. That's like getting a twenty year old and her grandmother for a fling in bed.
>>29522741
I know right? Total GMILF.
>>29522778
You gotta get the MILF though. She may be thin skinned but damn she's fast.
Be sure to get her French sister too.
>>29522790
Sexy family reunion when?
>>29521647
> "Abrams Sempai your sabot round is too long"
> "It's going to go right thought me"
> Pops top
> "Kyaa"
> Blushes
I'd inseminate the T-90
>>29522252
You realise that's a T-72B on your picture, right?
>>29525327
Enjoy kids with hereditary conjunctivitis.
>>29525894
DUDE
>>29525632
T-72B1, to be more specific.
>>29522258
It didn't have a gun stabilizer but it had a hydropneumatic suspension? Don't get me wrong I like the design and it could be one of the big what-ifs of the 70's? Had it succeeded it probable the M1's and the Leopards wouldn't have gone into production
>>29522258
lewd anon
>>29525894
>implying
Does this count?
Forgotten vickers
