[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Raytheon Pike 40mm laser guided munition with 2300 yard range.
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /k/ - Weapons

Thread replies: 148
Thread images: 24
File: image.jpg (315 KB, 1000x667) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
315 KB, 1000x667
Raytheon Pike 40mm laser guided munition with 2300 yard range.
>>
neat. can i have one ?
>>
File: image.jpg (579 KB, 2590x2072) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
579 KB, 2590x2072
>>
Yes, and? This isn't Reddit. You don't just post something saying what it is without any context.
>>
>>29512111
Jesus Christ Anon this is a blue board.
>>
>>29512111
Hot
>>
>>29512097

so it's like an anti-tank missile for people?
>>
CEP is 5 yards

in other words, it's complete trash. call me when raytheon manages to make a weapon that can actually hit something.
>>
>>29512111
That is the sexiest thing I've seen all day. And I just finished beating it.
>>
>>29512162
>has a kill radius larger than 5 yards
>durr I am a idiot
>>
>>29512191

That's completely false.
>>
>>29512162
>TOW
most sucessful ATGM ever developed. Most other ATGM's in the world are back engineered copies of it.
>JAV
2nd most sucessful ATGM on the planet.
All other nations shoulder fired ATGM's either copy it, or share design features.
>>
>>29512235
Go ahead and show me the salsa, seeing as a standard 40mm is 16 feet kill zone and still dangerous to 130m

Considering the CEP of an M203/230/MGL etc. is a lot more than 5 yards factoring in user error, let alone accuarte within 5 yards at beyond 1000m you are in fact a moron
>>
>>29512296
Call me when TOW could do shit to T-72s in the 70s and early 80s while konkurs could be mass produced for attachment to anything with a leg or motor and destroy NATO "armor"
>>
>>29512299

Oh, I get it. You're just making shit up. You don't actually know anything about this weapon.

In the future, just make that clear from the outset, please.
>>
>>29512162
>call me when raytheon manages to make a weapon that can actually hit something.
>>29512320
>Call me when TOW could do shit to T-72s in the 70s and early 80s

I can see... the goalposts... moving...
>>
>>29512352
>he doesn't know how to count new IP
TOW are perfectly capable of hitting, but can you penetrate soviet armor? Not in history.
>>
>>29512419
Can and did.
Im a TOW gunner, and I've blown the living shit outta T-72 hulls.

I think ive destroyed about a dozen tank hulls in the last 4 years. Mostly old M-60's but 3 T-72's. T-72's are literally a TOW gunners wet dream, they practically turn inside out, if loaded with a full magazine the turret will actually go flying.

You are referencing a tank that is infamous for its shoddy ammo racks actually rendering it highly vulnerable to the TOW missile.
>>
File: 1438179612313.jpg (190 KB, 1499x773) Image search: [Google]
1438179612313.jpg
190 KB, 1499x773
>>29512578
AHAAHHAAHAHAH LAST FOUR YEARS NIGGA THE COLD WAR IS OVER IT ONLY MATTERED WHEN THE SOVIET WAR MACHINE COULDN'T BE PENETRATED BY A-10 OR TOW-1

Nice 2 billion dollar TOW-3 missile.
>>
>>29512097
Useless crap comparing to Switchblade UAV.
>>
>>29512578
>I hit a dead tank holding perfectly still on a firing range, the whole point of which is to allow me to practice hitting things

I'm seriously impressed. Tell me more.
>>
How long until ISIS "moderates" use them ? Or they start hitting east Ukraine schools
>>
>>29512668
No, no, I'd much rather hear about all the missiles YOU have fired in the last few years.
>>
>>29512321
>still hasn't provided any data to back up his claims
>>
>>29512731

I fired loads from my hot missile into your mom and girlfriend
>>
>>29512419
>TOW
>can you penetrate soviet armor?
>Not in history.

Is this real life?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63ehKu7tYlY
>>
>>29512791
>he thinks old monkey models with monkey tankers operating in the middle east have any indication of what these armor are
>>
>>29512791
I think the guy is either a russian shill or a butthurt slavboo.
T-72's are getting buttfucked by poorly trained sandmonkeys armed with the old TOW 2 A's as we speak. Theres literally hundreds of videos proving this.
>>
>>29512809

And here, gentlemen we see the notorious slavaboo backpedalling in real time.

>can you penetrate soviet armor? Not in history.
>>
File: extreme memeing.webm (2 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
extreme memeing.webm
2 MB, 1280x720
>>29512774
>>
>>29512774
Jokes on you, I dont have either of those things.
>>
>>29512961

Your dad shit you out his ass then?
>>
>>29512973
I was adopted and my stepmom left me with my stepdad before I could remember, but I always liked to pretend I was a lost military experiment to create the perfect autist.

Imagine an autism so refined, so pure, that he can pass for normal, drifting about enemy territory contaminating thier gene pool until one day when he is needed he finally spergs out with the force of a thousand exploding suns right in the middle of the enemy population.

But until then he waits, watching, biding his time.........

Thats who you are.
>>
>>29512848
Only time it actually mattered, call back when they bring out a fully mechanized war machine as these things were meant to work in if you want to talk about the present, not some God is Great convoy.
>>
File: your post.jpg (28 KB, 300x240) Image search: [Google]
your post.jpg
28 KB, 300x240
>>29513049
>>
>>29513084
I said the soviet armor is justified for being better than what we had and isn't displayed now properly, so in no goalpost position could your strike make a mark.
>>
>>29512111
L...lewd
>>
File: Mac_interview.jpg (87 KB, 700x500) Image search: [Google]
Mac_interview.jpg
87 KB, 700x500
>>29512097
am I the only one that heard Macs voice when I looked at that picture?
>>
>>29517175
It has the accuracy of a sniper rifle, and the firepower of an m16
>>
>>29512111
+10 points to Raytheon for lewd

-10 points for not naming it Pilum.
>>
>>29512296
Ey the TOW is a decent missile and all, certainly not the best or succesfull though.
But the Javelin certainly isn't even close to the second spot. It's battery issues alone are a disqualifier.
>>
>>29517175
I can't hear mac's voice because he can't speak because he's dying of brain cancer
>>
File: Meanwhile, at k....png (347 KB, 805x677) Image search: [Google]
Meanwhile, at k....png
347 KB, 805x677
Just for you guys
>>
>>29517335
Too much exposure to experimental weapons
>>
>it's not a rifle grenade
what were they thinking?
>>
>>29512111
Whoa! NSFW!
>>
File: 1451431031165.jpg (233 KB, 515x623) Image search: [Google]
1451431031165.jpg
233 KB, 515x623
>>29512097
>>
>>29512097
Why do all these hellfire looking things seem so un-aerodynamic?

It's the simplest shape with that slightly rounded end and you can't imagine it flies better than some fancy design like what you might have in konkurs for example.
>>
>>29517493
Because they're small and light, and are going at relatively low speeds whether powered or unpowered. They don't need much to get them where they need to go.
>>
The fuselage is actually more stable than it would be on fighter since it doesn't go extremely fast.
>>
>>29512848
You see ivan if glorious russian crew was inside tank they would use slav magic to invoke the power of putin to turn the armour into swarovski diamond, this was how the T-72 was intended to be used not operated by kebab with zero slav-magic.
>>
>>29512097
How long until the phased plasma rifles with a 40 watt range?
>>
File: rusarms_0053.jpg (5 KB, 298x147) Image search: [Google]
rusarms_0053.jpg
5 KB, 298x147
>>29517493
>some fancy design like what you might have in konkurs for example.

you mean the missile that looks practically identical?
>>
>>29519773
Not much longer
-Definitely not a Raytheon employee
>>
>>29512097
That looks like the useless rocket thing from Iron Man that they only used because of contractual obligations.
>>
>>29519809


Hahah, i was thinking the exact same thing.
>>
>>29512809
>muh muh monkey model
>>
File: Phalic What's That.jpg (1 MB, 494x4746) Image search: [Google]
Phalic What's That.jpg
1 MB, 494x4746
>>29512097

Dildo technology has really come a long way.
>>
>>29512111
Hnnnngggg
>>
File: 1447416001490.png (71 KB, 475x411) Image search: [Google]
1447416001490.png
71 KB, 475x411
>>29512839
>>29512791
kill la kill yourselves fast

if you can't take it from some soviet documents then how about the CIA whining about T-72
>>
>>29519773
Google MARAUDER plasma weapon.
>>
Lest we forget about how a couple of M2 Bradleys armed with TOW's rekt a couple of T72's in Desert Storm.
>>
File: Ex-Wife.png (442 KB, 887x456) Image search: [Google]
Ex-Wife.png
442 KB, 887x456
>>29512097
>>
>>29519979
You do know Israel tested that claim and found it less than true.
>>
>>29512110
why would you need one?
>>
>>29520506
>need
fuck off bloomberg
>>
>>29512097
how much do they cost?

What's the range?

How lethal are they?
>>
>>29520552
>range
disregard that. Im retarded and just read the range
>>
>>29512097
Pike Munition on RQ-11B when?
>>
>>29512774
>get BTFO
>better insult his mom

Uppercut yourself and come back when you're 18.
>>
>>29520506
Am i being detained?
>>
>>29520593
Yes bend over.
>>
what use would an infantry man have for it
>>
>>29512097
This could very well be the thing that drives the nail in the coffin for XM-25 or any dreams of a revival of OICW.

Imagine how many lives it could have saved over the last decade.
>>
>>29517440
That's a lot larger and heavier than this thing. Fewer rounds available to the squad.
>>
File: tattoine-625x276.jpg (31 KB, 625x276) Image search: [Google]
tattoine-625x276.jpg
31 KB, 625x276
>>29512608
>tfw Commies were so enamored with American media and our way of life that they made their tank optics make everything look like Star Wars

Feels good man
>>
ITT No one knows what they're talking about
>>
File: tusken72m.jpg (168 KB, 1499x773) Image search: [Google]
tusken72m.jpg
168 KB, 1499x773
>>29521484
>>
File: obiwank.jpg (96 KB, 736x492) Image search: [Google]
obiwank.jpg
96 KB, 736x492
>>29521554
These blast points, too accurate for Sand People. Only Imperial Stormtroopers are so precise.
>>
>>29512162
you fucking retard.
>>
>>29521510
Top contribution you nigger faggot
>>
>>29512097
>man portable guided missile

Small arms and light weapons just got a whole lot heavier.

A few of these and a launcher on your back beats the shit out of an 84mm, and then some.
>>
>>29521380
It has order of magnitude better capabilities when Pike has all problems of manually aimed line of site weapons.
>>
>>29512162
Call me when you can throw a hand grenade 2300 yards.

With laser precision.
Or even snipe anyone from that range.
>>
How does it fly? Does it have a small jet engine?
>>
>>29512111
I need a cosmoline shower.
>>
>>29521643
Why put your company logo on a missle?

If its stationary there are only two explanations: It's already been bought by someone who knows who made it, or it failed and isn't the best advertisement.

Are they seriously hoping Habib is going to clock that logo at 1200 m/s and think "well if I survive this I'm buying Raytheon"?
>>
>>29512111
holy shit, don't tell me it's man portable...


I gjs got thjis njew $120 kjeybjoard and njow the jjjjj key ijs stjicky wjith cum, thx /k/
>>
>>29512839
not to mention T72 got BTFO in chechenia so hard they had to rename it's newer models into T90 to escape the stigma of the shamefur streetsign display the T72 family is world-famous for
>>
>>29524000
Are you serious? That's a pic from a demo for the new Tomahawk Block 4 before it was awarded a contract a couple years ago.
>>
>>29513105
You lost.
>>
>>29524040
If you're telling me this is the only missile that had a logo on it then that's perfectly valid and I withdraw my complaint. I thought they put a logo on the ones they've actually already sold, not a demo piece.
>>
>>29517175
>It has the accuracy of a sniper rifle and the firepower of a 40mm grenade launcher
>>
File: 6l-image.jpg (24 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
6l-image.jpg
24 KB, 600x450
>>29524063
Here's a wider shot of the same missile as it was being escorted. Ones made for the military are your standard grey.
>>
>>29524079
Well, that makes perfect sense then, thank you mate.
>>
>>29524079
>Tomahawk is as big as a fucking F-14 fuselage

So has anyone ever taken out the warhead and tried to put in a guy? You know, with a fancy parachute system that extracts the pod he's in while the missile slams full rape force into a target after air-dropping him.

God damn it that would be cool as fuck.
>>
>>29524000
Selling advertising space.

Fucking imagine it. Just before the missile hits and you die, you see it:

"In your next life, try the new Midnight Moonshine Thickburger from Hardee's! Give code IJUSTDIED for a ten percent discount!"
>>
>>29524124

...what?
>>
File: 54260b42ec931.image.jpg (68 KB, 620x405) Image search: [Google]
54260b42ec931.image.jpg
68 KB, 620x405
>>29524124
That's just the perspective fucking with you
>>
>>29512111
>barely inserted earplugs
>>
File: 1366687590756.gif (296 KB, 500x211) Image search: [Google]
1366687590756.gif
296 KB, 500x211
>>29512097
>>29512111
>2300 yds
>shoulder fired

Holy flying fuck nuggets
>>
File: 1369839181129.jpg (213 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
1369839181129.jpg
213 KB, 1024x768
>>29512097
Its shit, like that Brimstone Bullshit that turned out to be a useless scam
>>
>>29512321
>calls other people out for not knowing specs
>doesn't know specs
>>
>>29512944
more like extreme shitposting
>>
>>29524201

The specs are listed on Raytheon's website.
>>
>>29524149
If we ever bring back dive bombers we should put advertisement blaring horns in them
>"IF YOU SURVIVE THIS, BE SURE TO DRINK COKE!"
>(BOOOM)
>>
>>29524063
>I thought they put a logo on the ones they've actually already sold

Please insert a gun into your mouth and suck start it
>>
>>29520506

GET FUCKED COMMIE
>>
>>29524266
so whats the explosive radius?
>>
>>29520506
It seems like I could masturbate with it, an inert version, of course. Wouldn't mind a silicone version at all
>>
>>29524297

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=raytheon+pike
>>
>>29512111
Nobody is recognizing these trips
shame on you
>>
>>29524124
You mean like a kamikaze plane but with an ejector seat?
>>
>>29517440
the new wii u looks nice
>>
>>29517440
yfw Nintendo starts manufacturing military grade gamepads
>>
>>29524330
wow would you look at that, none of the pages on Raytheon's site list an explosive radius

You're fucking retarded and wrong
>>
>>29520388
Great Goy
>>
>>29524124
Japs did it, it was shit
>>
>>29512296
>>TOW
>most sucessful ATGM ever developed
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

i agree that TOW is a fantastic piece of hardware, but those awards definitely go to Metis, or the Konkurs.
>>
>>29512578
>Im a TOW gunner, and I've blown the living shit outta T-72 hulls.
monkey models literally don't count for shit.
>INB4 LE MONKEY MODEL, an export T-90A literally took a fucking TOW in Syria a month or so ago and there was no damage to anyone except the stupid fucking crew that had all the countermeasures turned off, and were turned out
>>
>>29512848
>>29512839
>>29519848
Monkey models actually ARE a thing. refer to >>29526985
>>
>>29521339
>that drives the nail in the coffin for XM-25

Anon, the XM-25 started LRIP.
>>
>>29527007
>and there was no damage

You see tovarish, when you release photo that hides impact site, you can claim no damage.
>>
>>29527007
>muh monkey model
>>
>>29524196
>Brimstone Bullshit
brimstone is just british Hellfire m8, what are you talking about?
>>
>>29526985
Both of which are, at best, comperable to a TOW 2A.
>>
>>29527106
>>29527131
you see dumb shits, when the video is literally posted by the Jihadi that SHOT THE FUCKING MISSILE, AND THEN POSTED THE ATGM CARRIER IT SHOT AT IT WITH ON TWITTER you can claim no damage.
>>
>>29521339
>This could very well be the thing that drives the nail in the coffin for XM-25 or any dreams of a revival of OICW.

you're stupid, two different weapons in different roles
>>
>>29527166
Can someone translate this into english?
>>
>>29527190
okay so the T-90A i'm talking about right? it got shot at by an insurgent. they did a "gun cam" esque video with the ATGM, showing the missile flying towards the tank, the impact, AND if they completely killed the crew and disabled the tank they would show the aftermath.

said T-90, took a TOW round to the front of the turret, and the entire crew was perfectly fine. However, the commander jumped out because he was scared as fuck, and a dirty sandmonkey so he's incompetent. i say this, because like I mentioned in my earlier post, the crew (the commander) had turned off the electronic anti-missile systems to prevent the missile from hitting in the first place, and they had the hatches of the tank open, which resulted in the commander probably having his ear drums popped open like cherries.

The tank was completely fine, and the ERA was barely scraped.

LATER that week, the same terrorist group who had claimed to fire at the tank in question posted a picture of the TOW they used to shoot the tank.
>>
>>29521339
XM-25 WITH UNDERBARREL MISSILE LAUNCHER
>>
>>29527007
>, an export T-90A literally took a fucking TOW in Syria a month or so ago
Video did not reveal exactly where tank was hit. Any tank could survive glancing hit if there is nothing important on the path of the jet.
>>
>>29527332
yes it fucking did. it hit the turret directly, close to the right cheek.
>>
>>29524525
X-box controllers are already the de-facto standard for anything smaller than a full control panel in a vehicle or trailer somewhere
>>
>>29527351
Post after hit photo of this turret. Oh, wait... >>29527106
>>
>>29527385
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2rfyeR-YaJw

kill yourself son, please
>>
>>29527246
You claimed there was no damage, and are now backtracking to say it was not a catastrophic kill.
>>
File: 56456.jpg (26 KB, 420x420) Image search: [Google]
56456.jpg
26 KB, 420x420
>>29527401
>thinks this video proves anything
If it had x10 times bitrate and x100 framerate than maybe. But yourtubeshit at 30 fps? plz.
>>
>>29527434
>implying i ever backtracked at all
there was no damage to the tank.
>>29527443
10/10 b8 right here
>>
>>29527462
>there was no damage to the tank.
But will not post part of tank that was hit, because there was totally no damage trust us. Full damage control mode kek.
>>
File: 1451473815511.jpg (48 KB, 351x380) Image search: [Google]
1451473815511.jpg
48 KB, 351x380
>>29527496
IT FUCKING SHOWS THE TANK AFTER IT GOT HIT

holy fuck autist b8er, you got me. you win this round.
>>
>>29527462
Wait do vodka rocket engineers analyze missiles flight path during tests using 30 fps videos? It explains a lot about vodka rockets.
>>
>>29527534
can you stop samefagging? and either way, if you're not what does that even have to do with anything?
>>
>>29527512
>IT FUCKING SHOWS THE TANK AFTER IT GOT HIT
Really? Screenshot and point part of tank that was hit and we can see damage to this part confirming that shaped charge exploded against it.
>>
>>29524279
>inna afghanistan
>open desert
>quiet, mild wind blows
>SHHHHHHHOOOOMMM
>THIS TOMAHAWK BOMBARDMENT IS BROUGHT TO YOU BY OLIVE GARDEN AND ITS COMMITMENT TO THE ARMED FORCES! TRY OUR NEW DELUXE NEVERENDING PASTA BOWL FOR A LIMITED TIME ONLY! OLIVE GARDEN: WHEN YOU'RE HERE, YOU'RE FAMILY!
>FOOMPH
>>
>>29524124

>F-14

Try again my blind brotha.
>>
>>29524169
>perspective
FUCK

>>29524164
>>29524416
>>29526928
Not really an ejector seat, that would probably kill the occupant, but the missile splits in two parts (the back part would slow down to clear the first using a drogue chute) and the man-occupied part deploys a drogue chute to slow down and then either deploys a larger parachute or splits open to allow the occupant to use his chute.

Meanwhile the other section loses it's own drogue chute, continues on it's original path, and then allahu ackbars into the ground.
>>
File: i saw it.gif (2 MB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
i saw it.gif
2 MB, 500x281
>>29512111
>witnessed
Thread replies: 148
Thread images: 24

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.