I have a massive hardon for modern vs. WW2 stuff. I want to see a modern American platoon kick the shit out of a 1943 Kraut platoon. I want to see a Eurofighter shoot down a P-51. I want to see a modern Jap helicopter carrier shit all over 1939 Chinamen armies off the coast.
Since I will never get this in any form of media because it's too autistic, do you guys wanna talk about it?
I'd love to talk about whether a Luftwaffe gruppe of bf-109 K4s could break through to bomb an army base w/ patriot missle SAMs
I have a massive hardon for school girls with ribbons.
Also, OP is a faget.
>>29492818
rude
>>29492818
I have a massive hardon for killing pedophiles.
>>29492876
She's 18 or something. Legal in every country in the world.
>>29492818
I also like ribbons.
>>29492818
>>29492825
>>29492876
>>29492887
>>29492932
>>29492796
I want to see Messerschmitts shoot down Apaches. I want to see Bradleys mowing down Panzer IVs only to be thwarted by the same 88 guns that destroyed their predecessors. I want it to be hit into peoples heads that higher technolgy does not excuse Arab-tier tactics and strategy.
>>29492979
I like you
>>29492979
I would love to see a B-1 litter the ground with cluster munitions and wipe out an entire soviet armor division.
I want to see an Iowa class wipe a new chinese destroyer off the map
>>29492796
I only like seeing them side by side.
>>29492943
wew
I just have a massive hard-on.
>No I don't...
>>29493225
Why isn't the Typhoon flying with a Typhoon?
Just go to atthefrontshop.com, get you a M1942 Jump uniform and go to the range with an AR-15 then go home and jack off into the helmet.
Will that be good enough for you?
>>29498248
Because it didn't fight in the battle of Britain. This was a memorial flight, hence the camo.
>>29492876
I spotted the closet pedophile guys
>>29492796
Axis of Time trilogy by John Birmingham, trust me
>>29492796
You know, there was a movie made in 1980 called The Final Countdown, you might be interested in. The general plot was "Dude... what if a modern aircraft carrier got sent back in time to just before the attack on Pearl Harbor?"
>>29492979
Funny thing is, the current in-service Bradleys can shrug off 88L56 rounds in the frontal aspect if they have their ERA packages. But tigers will be very much vulnerable to M919 out to 2 kilometers.
Technology has come a long way.
>>29493225
>hurricane
>>29492796
Have this :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7Nn7WNQJHc
>>29492796
k4 could not break through unless it terrain masked hard as fuck. I love taking my k4 in modern engadgements in dcs but i always get fucked. me and my little bro were trying to see if we could use the 109s flaregun to distract missiles but nope there too.
>>29493181
>you will never see a formation of four dozen B-1s carpet bombing like their ancestor did
You should watch GATE OP.
>You will never fly a Dawn Patrol from field airstrip with re-armed Bearcat air racer painted in crazy pacing paintjob.
>You will never hunt ATF helicopters and Predator Drones during 2nd murrikan revolution.
>>29499709
It's just going to give OP massive blue balls though.
>>29499673
>Axis of Time
This
>>29499709
>recommending Blueballs the movie
I hope your memeing.
>>29499673
Hello fellow Ausfag
>>29502552
>Blueballs the movie
This soooo fucking hard I can't even begin to explain how mad I was when the fucking wing was recalled....
>>29492979
>I want to see Messerschmitts shoot down Apaches.
Feasible, but aren't Apache helicopters armored to take on 30mm rounds, like the cannon on the ME-109?
> I want to see Bradleys mowing down Panzer IVs only to be thwarted by the same 88 guns that destroyed their predecessors.
Few Bradley's got killed by tanks with 125mm guns in the Gulf War (because the Bradley's TOW missile outranged them), what makes you think WWII era tanks with 88mm guns got a chance?
>I want it to be hit into peoples heads that higher technolgy does not excuse Arab-tier tactics and strategy.
That'd be cool, but what makes you think an army operating American equipment would work like that?
>>29492887
Look up the age of consent in Japan. Fun reading.
>>29499753
>Bradleys can shrug off 88L56 rounds in the frontal aspect if they have their ERA packages
Are you sure about that?
>>29500448
I apologize for ignorance.T
The pilot there has his hands off the controls for most of the taxi-ing in the video. Does the F-22 have some advanced automated take-off? Or is it more, "it's going in a straight line so I can fuck around" ?
>>29505121
>Apache armored to take on 30mm
Call me when that happens.
>>29505338
>I apologize for ignorance.
I was going to berate you, but since you're so nice... when a plane is on the ground, taxiing, the nose or tail wheel is of course what controls the direction of the plane while it is on the ground, and they're controlled via the rudder pedals, which are controlled by the pilots feet.
>>29505645
Oh, wow, no you're right. I should be berated. That was an exceedingly dumb question.
I was thinking of how on carriers, pilots have a handhold away from the stick to keep from fucking the CATOBAR launch up.
Like this, OP?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9G-zfvlOQk
What does /k/ think of Rome Sweet Rome?
>>29505826
sweaty big nosed tanned guidos. thats what i think of it
>>29501252
I want a third season so badly
>>29505257
88L56 isn't rated for that that high penetration, 130mm ish or so. Estimates for a naked M2A3 place it's RHAE at around the 70+ range. ERA only has to account for another 50-60 mm of protection to protect against the KwK 36.
>>29505984
But era doesn't work on kinetics?
>>29506322
Not that anon, but I'm pretty certain that they do. It's just that modern KEP's are too fast and thin. Low velocity, large WW2 munitions would be affected.