If all guns, including fully automatic were made legal, what would happen to guns like the AR 15 or modified AK?
They'd still be popular. Feeding and maintaining a full auto is a bitch on your wallet.
>>29471827
They would be modified to have full auto capabilities with terrifying speed.
man what is the point of a lower reciever that can only take one caliber? that's like the anti-caveat of ARs.
>>29471855
funny since you could get an echo trigger which is fast as is. anything more and you're replacing barrels.
>>29471871
I only own AKs
>>29471827
A more cost efficient round would penetrate the market. Perhaps near maximally powerful rimfire cartridge.
Conversely, rounds above 5.56 would fail to take off.
>>29471855
Who says they'd have to be full auto? 2 and/or 3 round bursts seem like an effective compromise.
And if nationally autofire was legalized, states (or provinces or whatever they call em in unfree countries) might still limit guns to burst fire.
>>29471871
Assdeaddicks.
>>29471994
they should make a rimless,primerless, caseless, powderless, bulletless round for cost effectiveness.
You're overestimating the usefulness and practicality of firing full auto.
>>29471827
DIAS and Lightning Links everywhere.
>>29471994
I own an AC-556. It already has a full time .22LR kit because wallet.
>>29472164
>Own NFA weapon
>shoot in .22LR instead of centerfire
>this is somehow a problem
First world problems right there bro
Honestly, full auto is a meme. I really wouldn't bother converting my ar or my sgl31 to select fire but I would buy an mp5 clone and do it in a heartbeat.
Full auto isn't a big deal as people make it out to be.
>>29472350
Its fun.
>>29471994
>compromise
Say it with me-
SHALL
>>29471827
They would be just as popular as they are now.
Sub guns would probably be more popular by the simple fact they shoot a cheaper round.
>>29473876
Hey, why do you NEED a full auto gun? 3 round burst, or even two round burst still seems pretty damn deadly enough! You should be happy to settle on a burstfire gun!
>>29472350
>full auto is a meme
lol, /k/ everyone
>>29471871
Magwell block suck ass and all in all a lower doesnt cost much anyway.
Id keep a semi auto riffle and pistol but a SAW and some kind of SMG would have a place in my home for sure point is ARs would still be pretty common in the US
>>29471827
It would be extremely painful
>>29471827
What do you mean made legal? Machine guns are already perfectly legal to own, as well as almost any other fire arm. Unless you're talking about the 3-4 states in the US that have bans on arbitrary features, which nobody cares about those places anyway.
>>29471827
Eh plenty of semi auto AR and the like wereading sold when the book was open.
>>29476541
I mean, like no liscense needed, machine guns being treated the same way semi autos are treated now
>>29476447
You're a big rifle
>>29471827
There would probably be a decent market for conversion kits to make those two guns fully auto. However, semiautos would still sell the same. Think about this: Why do people still buy bolt actions and single-shots and the like when semi-autos are just as available. Gun purchases aren't always about their perceived tactical capabilities.
>>29471827
full auto sounds cool, but is ultimately useless.
not saying i dont want it, just id never use it
