Welp /k/, is this the end or will Republican feet dragging finally do us some good?
>>29278854
I mean look at this refutation. Clearly the content of his opinion is irrelevant! Just ignore that and remember other judges wanted to rehear it two, just pretend their motivation wasn't entirely different.
Pack it up and go home. Everything's fine~~~
WEW LAD
E
W
L
A
D
>>29278837
Fuck off OP.
Go back to /pol/ you faggot.
>>29278924
Not OP, this concerns the fate of civilian ownership in the United States.
YOU fuck off.
>>29278942
Please, See >>27429070
>>29278942
Nice try OP. Go back to /pol/
>>29279023
/thread
>>29278924
Not OP either, and you can find the revolving door back to sheddit, SJWahhhhh...
I don't trust anyone nominated by either party. "Moderate" is code-talk for leaving our unbelievably fucked-up status quo intact. DC is incapable of choosing anyone with two brain cells to rub together, so into the trash with this whacko.
Goodbye gun rights.
I suppose if we're lucky we'll get to keep bolt actions, lever actions, pump actions and revolvers...
>>29278872
It says he's a moderate in that link
>>29279091
Look at the before and after
A 5th jew would give a jewish majority on the supreme court
This is why they killed scalia
>>29279091
That's kind of his point m80. It didn't say that this morning.
>>29279036
>>29279026
>>29279023
>>29278924
WE. HAVE. ALWAYS. TALKED. GUN. RELATED. POLITICS. ON. THIS. BOARD.
IT. IS. RELEVANT.
Fuck the new mods and fuck the newfags.
>>29279026
It wasn't OP. You can tell because it bumped the thread.
Furthermore I can tell it wasn't OP because I'm OP.
>>29279097
The before says he's a liberal, and the after says he's a moderate, but the cited source says he's a moderate. It's likely that the revision immediately before that changed moderate to liberal.
hopefully he gets fucking stonewalled
>>29279023
>>29279036
You newfags are the cancer that is killing /k/
Gun control is in fact fucking weapon related, and /pol/ is a cesspool where you can't have a constructive conversation about it.
> Obama nominates another gun-hating liberal Jew
No surprise here. Let the seat stay vacant.
>>29279138
they dont even have a hearing scheduled as of now
Get to letter writing and phone calling /k/ommandos of your local legislature.
Which AR brand would handle long weeks disassembled inside a PVC pipe innawoods?
I hope he gets nominated. Clinton has a very very very good chance of winning the election, and I fear her nominations may not be as moderate.
>>29279125
This, I've been coming to /k/ since around 2008 and holy fuck have things changed. The tone shift has been absurd.
The whole gamergate thing is when it started, those asshat spammers drew in a flood of reddit. What a coincidence that the definition of "on-topic" got narrowed significantly right when we got swarmed by people who came from a site with a different board for every fucking minor schism. Not to mention the mods got infiltrated by people with an agenda.
There's impressionable high school kids that come here and need to be educated about their rights and the state thereof, people need to fuck off with their sperg fits and start organizing politically. Places like this are where those things happen.
>>29279206
I'm Californian in a district that's been blue since 1997 with a representative that voted yes to every single one of the post sandy hoax bills.
A voodoo doll would be more productive than letter writing.
>>29279071
I'll never bury my AK, that's all I got to say about that.
>>29279193
The guy Obama nominated before him was a true moderate, pro gun republican. The establishment made him reject the nomination just so they wouldn't look like they were compromising, and now we've got an uber lefty pinko jew since they were going to fight him if he nominated zombie Reagan himself.
Blame your obstructionist party for killing guns.
>>29279458
This is the first nomination Obama has made since Scalia passed. What are you talking about?
>>29279461
He was one of the first names to come out publicly, but refused before he could even be formally nominated :
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/brian-sandoval-supreme-court_us_56cf41abe4b0bf0dab311e2b
>>29279535
He left a lifetime court appointment to become governor in the first place. It seems more likely that he genuinely cares about Nevada.
>>29279733
His jurisdiction as a judge was in Nevada.
He probably got tired of being a judge and wanted an executive role, which is probably the real reason he turned down the consideration.
Nevertheless, it would've been nice to have this issue closed up instead of gambling it all on Shillary losing.
>>29278872
>>29279091
>>29279097
>>29279104
It says judicial moderate if you go back to a 2015 version of the article. Here's the July 9, 2015 entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Merrick_Garland&diff=670624746&oldid=662891363
>>29279276
Second this 100%. We did not forget.
>>29279859
>Shillary
>losing
It's like you don't know about American Civil War: The Sequal. Here's a hint, it's releasing soon!
>>29281376
Good. Hopefully we finally get those damn niggers back to the fields.
>>29278837
1.7% of the population, 55% of the Supreme Court.
>>29279276
>What a coincidence that the definition of "on-topic" got narrowed significantly right when we got swarmed by people who came from a site with a different board for every fucking minor schism.
More like, what a coincidence that mods started removing political topics on other boards to keep what happened with gamergate from happening again. Also to keep /pol/acks from coming out of their containment board and shitposting here.
So on a scale of scared to shitting myself, how worried should I be about:
1. His possibility of getting approved by Congress
2. What will happen if he does fill the seat
>>29281970
1. 5/10
2. 2/10
>>29279125
/k/ can't be pro gun anymore
it's for pictures only
>>29281970
0/10
-38/10
>>29281387
This exactly. Why shouldn't they be 100% of the court? If Obama could walk a mile in our shoes he'd change his mind so fast. Fucking anti-Semitic asshole.
>>29281409
Like it or not, gun rights are political and/pol/ is one of the most popular boards on this site.
>>29282553
>>29282626
Care to explain?
>>29279276
Remember the sticky thread for Heller? Shit, it was better and more informative than anything on TV.
Yes, younglings, once upon a time the mods STICKIED gun control threads -- if they were important enough. We got a sticky when BOPE cleaned out the favelas in Brazil, too. Pic related.
You autists are ruining /k/ the only reason I learned anything about my gun rights was that it was discussed on /k/. It's not fucking off topic it is the goddamn topic.
>>29279387
I can already see the panic buying ramping up in the Orange Curtain. Fuck
>>29282711
Take your racism back to /pol/ you fucking bigot.
>>29282735
>bigot
Nice b8. Gun rights aren't fucking racist
>>29282735
Worst troll is worst.
>>29282711
Same story here. Dubs of truth
>>29282735
I'm assuming this is a joke nice nothing about race was ever mentioned
>>29282743
Ok, you're reaaally grating on my nerves man. Tell me who you are. You don't get to hide behind a veil of anonymity anymore. You lost that privilege.
You're probably a fucking white male. Racist facist idiot. Keep /pol/ in /pol/. This is a safe board where you don't get to spew your "muh unlimited 2nd amendment" pro-gun political hate speech.
>>29282735
Autists are a race...?
>>29282711
>it IS the topic
THIS
H
I
S
>>29279276
been here since 09
definitely miss the old /k/
watered down /k/ doesnt give me the feels
even miss duke
>>29281409
Hence why the mods should end it once and for all and do to /pol/ what they did to /fur/.
>>29282794
(You)
>>29282684
It's gonna be hard for republicans to not at least vote on him. He got confirmed with huge bipartisan support back in the 90's, and he's been very very moderate since then. I don't think you have to worry too much, because odds are he's moderate on 2a as well. People who talk about his vote to rehear Heller are either oversimplifying or underinformed.
>>29279535
huff post, please.
>>29278924
Do you enjoy watching your wife raped by niggers?
>>29283862
I know you won't believe anything unless it came straight from Trump's mouth, but w\e
> http://mynews4.com/news/politics/nevada-gov-brian-sandoval-gets-floated-as-a-possible-supreme-court-nominee
Mike Lee, please don't let this guy make it out of committee.
>>29279276
>>29282704
Da fuq? Man, i missed all the good shit.
>E N T R Y I S M
>>29278837
He looks like an older Mark Ruffalo.
>>29281970
1. 1/10 they won't even have a vote on it but if they did he wouldn't get appointed.
2. 9/10 he would be worse than Ginsburg.
>>29282794
Here's your (you)
the lengths the newfags go to for a (you) is pretty shitty. it shits up the board as a whole and derails some really good threads
>>29285287
And you're a fucking tard. In 2010, he was the hand-picked and preferred nominee of the right-wing to fill Stevens' old seat. Instead, we got Kagen because Obama wanted someone 1, more liberal, and 2, more minority.
This is a guy who got his current bench with a 76/23 vote, and the 23 Republicans who opposed him in 1997 didn't oppose HIM, they opposed adding another seat to the DC appeals bench.
Lrn2reeed, kiddo.
>>29278837
Do you want him or do you want who President Clinton II appoints to a democratically controlled senate?
>>29279276
I'm so sick of this new wave of "pro gun liberals" that have flooded /k/ over the past year.
Anyone that says they are a liberal or Democrat and are also pro guns is either shilling or shitposting.
I have no idea how intense the mental gymnastics must be to claim you are pro gun and then be an internet warrior for politicians that blatantly want to take that right away from you.
They know they can't win these debates, so they either silence you or they tell you to go back to /pol/, which they have intentionally allowed to become a cesspool because there is zero moderation. Cuck porn and 15 Bernie threads will sometimes stay up on /pol/ until they are just pushed out by more shit post threads.
>>29286154
I'd consider myself a pro-gun liberal if we were using the term liberal properly, with the meaning it had originally.
Conservatism is a fairly new trend here imo, only really starting 2012ish. 4chan hated the fuck out of George W back in the day.
Not Moderate
Write your representative.
>>29278837
Should we be worried about this guy?
>>29286233
Liberal is now only used to refer to people who vote purely based on the identity politics of racism, sexism, gay marriage, gun bans, and abortion.
If you voted for Obama, then you are not pro gun. If you vote for Bernie or Shillery, then you are not pro gun. If you voted for Democratic senators, then you are not pro gun. You are neutral at the absolute very best.
>>29286278
nah I only vote conservative
it just saddens me how much democrats have perverted the word liberal
>>29286273
They'll most likely attempt to revist Heller at some point in the next eight years.
They'll have to false flag another sandy hook to make it semi believable though
>>29286278
>bernie not pro gun
B-but he's not as bad as h-hillary, he voted for the manufacturer lawsuit protection...
>>29278854
>"[t]he Tatel and Garland votes were no surprise, since they had earlier signaled their strong hostility to gun owner rights" in a previous case
what previous case?
I can't find anything about Garland on guns except the vote to rehear the Heller case
>>29286154
>>29286278
I know it may be hard for you to comprehend, but there are an incredibly wide range of issues that people that can hold views on and each person weighs issues differently. Someone could very well consider some issues that the Democratic party supports and the Republican party opposes to be more important issues to them than the issue of guns, making the Democratic party the better choice for them. That doesn't mean they're anti gun though, just as someone can supports gay marriage but consider it a low ranking issue and vote for the Republican party. This idea that people's views on every issue perfectly mirror the views of the party they vote for is completely ridiculous and has to die, preferably along with the two party system in general.
>>29286715
The two party system means that you are all-in on every issue of that party, whether you believe in those things are not.
You may actually be pro gun and for fag marriage, but you are selecting one over the other by which party you vote for.
Wish it wasn't that way, but that's how it is, and while you may be pro gun, you're not actually pro gun by voting Democrat.
>>29279535
>refused before formal nomination
thats not how that works, you fucking liberal retard
>>29286830
I voted libertarian... Like a true American would.
>>29286830
The democratic platform is pro considering new regulation on firearms but has no real plan to expand firearm regulation, and short of a bipartisan firearms control bill (LOL, Not going to happen) the only way any new gun control laws are coming is with a democratic majority in the house and senate, something you aren't going to see until '18 at the earliest, and that's if Trump successfully rapes the whole down-ticket Republican race this year.
Most democrats are lukewarm at best on gun control and it's pretty much accepted that it pisses some people off and makes nobody happy or willing to vote for you.
>>29279228
No, they're going to be Leftist as fuck.
If Hillary wins we seriously need to push for secession in states like Texas, Arizona and other conservative areas. Like, that whore will be the death of this country. She'll do to us what Merkel did to Germany.
>>29278924
/pol/ is for nazis and racists, not real discussion of politics.
>>29286900
Don't tell him that, he'll probably go on to say that voting for them is giving a vote to the Democrat candidate.
>>29286992
>She'll do to us what Merkel did to Germany.
Usher in the night of a thousand molestations?
>>29286995
Such incredible bs that nazi part. And everyone is a fucking racist to some extent, niggers, gooks, hebes included. As if there is anything inherently wrong with racism.
